Crypto Narratives
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/ Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام Crypto Narratives
کانال Crypto Narratives (@cryptonarratives1) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 21 600 مشترک است و جایگاه 5 261 را در دسته رمزارزها و رتبه 1 826 را در منطقه الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 21 600 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 25 اوت, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر -63 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر -8 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 22.68% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 14.55% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 4 900 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 3 142 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 35 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند mstr, hype, chart, axs, eth تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/
Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain
Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 26 اوت, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته رمزارزها تبدیل کردهاند.
21 600
مشترکین
-824 ساعت
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد7 روز
-6330 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
ابر برچسبها
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
اوت '26
اوت '26
+152
در 13 کانالها
ژوئیه '26
+177
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+356
در 25 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '26
+392
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+474
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+273
در 11 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+180
در 14 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '26
+286
در 21 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '25
+368
در 24 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+501
در 14 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+1 481
در 31 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+708
در 12 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+711
در 28 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+494
در 12 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+409
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '25
+838
در 31 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+338
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+452
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+752
در 21 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+882
در 20 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+1 132
در 19 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+2 145
در 22 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+1 487
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+2 825
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+581
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+396
در 12 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+442
در 7 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '24
+1 207
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+715
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+1 167
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+931
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+725
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+1 011
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+476
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+223
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+2 009
در 0 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 26 اوت | +5 | |||
| 25 اوت | +5 | |||
| 24 اوت | +5 | |||
| 23 اوت | +13 | |||
| 22 اوت | 0 | |||
| 21 اوت | +8 | |||
| 20 اوت | +7 | |||
| 19 اوت | +4 | |||
| 18 اوت | +2 | |||
| 17 اوت | +12 | |||
| 16 اوت | +5 | |||
| 15 اوت | +4 | |||
| 14 اوت | +11 | |||
| 13 اوت | +2 | |||
| 12 اوت | +3 | |||
| 11 اوت | +5 | |||
| 10 اوت | +8 | |||
| 09 اوت | +4 | |||
| 08 اوت | +6 | |||
| 07 اوت | +5 | |||
| 06 اوت | +10 | |||
| 05 اوت | +4 | |||
| 04 اوت | +4 | |||
| 03 اوت | +5 | |||
| 02 اوت | +5 | |||
| 01 اوت | +10 |
پستهای کانال
+4
All the previous instances of pumps that were similar to the current one did resolve higher during this cycle
I'm betting on this time not being different
| 2 |  This also applies to XLM, but it's not a major | 2 468 |
| 3 |  +2Best major to use as a hedge short is XRP imo
It had a +70% squeeze after months of zombie price action
XRPBTC looks like a spike that is now already exhausted | 2 598 |
| 4 |  AI stocks higher low is in?
$MU | 3 415 |
| 5 |  We are in risk-on szn | 5 548 |
| 6 | By keeping STRC below par, the market is essentially forcing Saylor's hand into destroying bitcoin-per-share as well as making him unable to buy BTC
By creating a new "USD Cash" balance, he's now for the first time dipping his toes into explicit "market timing".
What he has done instead until now was basically buying BTC as soon as possible whenever he had cash, and then he was forced to de-lever (ie sell MSTR or BTC) at rather bad prices as a punishment for his fomo'ing at local highs.
The fact that he now has a USD Cash balance means he'll be able to try to time the market on his purchases and sales, which you can either see as good (if you think he'll be rather conservative) or catastrophically bad (considering his historical 'top blasting' urge)
https://x.com/saylor/status/2091859021456146659 | 4 270 |
| 7 |  I'm getting bulled up alone watching the chart being unable to dump | 4 070 |
| 8 |  I guess we have the answer lol
$ZEC | 4 816 |
| 9 | Flipping your bias from bearish to bullish after you missed the opportunity of closing your shorts in profit is one of the hardest things to do
Psychological biases are the biggest enemies of the trader | 5 296 |
| 10 |  LTF blow-off tops like that are often the signal for ALTBTC charts to shine, with BTC needing some time to consolidate after a giga-run
But it's even more bullish if BTC immediately goes up again | 5 026 |
| 11 | Reminder that BTC is a momentum asset, meaning it finds new buyers by going up | 5 522 |
| 12 |  Lockout rally
Textbook no-pullback price action | 5 121 |
| 13 | Lockout trend on BTC, chart looks like we'll have continuation before getting a pullback | 5 104 |
| 14 |  $BTW is a $7bn FDV scam coin
When one of these appears, my question always is "can it reach the $20bn FDV club?"
Given the fact that the funding has been highly positive on that one, I'd say no.
Positive funding also implies that it's significantly less riskier to short, but there's always a risk of the funding rate flipping negative. | 5 462 |
| 15 | Congrats to Venice equity holders!
$VVV would be a no-brainer bid if there wasn't a token<>equity dual structure
But unfortunately there is one, and VVV is "only" buying back & burning $7M a year worth of tokens, against a $700M mcap and $40M annual emissions
https://x.com/ErikVoorhees/status/2089375845425287610 | 5 427 |
| 16 | Unfortunately, Saylor is doubling down on his very bad idea to keep capping $STRC at $100.00
In his example, someone is shorting $10bn of STRC at $100 AND Strategy is able to keep issuing a ton of STRC at $100 at the same time, but that's not what's going to happen
Some people will be shorting a lot of STRC between $99 and $100, which will prevent the price from reaching $100 and incentivize holders to sell right below $100 too.
STRC not reaching $100 means Strategy has to keep deploying efforts and money to get it back to par, which in the current situation means selling BTC or MSTR at a 'low price' to buy STRC close to $100, ie the exact opposite of the trade he wants to do once STRC is at par.
The only thing that will push STRC decisively to $100 will be BTC pumping high enough, which also implies that when Saylor will be able to raise USD, BTC will be at a "high price" on a relative basis.
His reasoning is that he wants holders to be certain that STRC won't go above $100, which should reduce uncertainty and paralysis with regards to buying/selling STRC.
I think that's completely wrong because he's imagining that the ideal scenario will be STRC trading between $99 and $100, so he caps STRC at $100 to get closer to this idealistic scenario, but he doesn't realize that it's unrealistic and will never happen.
I's mathematically IMPOSSIBLE to reduce the volatility of STRC down to 1%, the volatility swings will always be around 10%, but now instead of having this volatility between $95 and $105, he's forcing it to be between $90 and $100.
So the holders will have the uncertainty/paralysis anyway, but they'll have it at a lower price and with a much worse r/r profile than if he didn't cap STRC at par.
I'm going to write a full article on this topic because it's important and I'm surprised he's doubling down on this.
https://x.com/TNorth/status/2089509833699369363 | 7 194 |
| 17 |  $SNDK is up +50% with basically zero drawdown
One could theoretically still argue that this is a dead cat bounce, but my opinion is instead that memory top callers are definitely going to be proven wrong
The easier trade that you could take with higher size is now done though, more than half the July sell-off has been retraced, levering up here is not the way to go | 5 977 |
| 18 | In trading, trying to make money too fast is the main reason you won't make money at all | 4 981 |
| 19 |  Some unlocks starting soon apparently on $MON
More generally, as long as the market is dead, I don't really see why this wouldn't bleed down to $1bn FDV
(MEGA is already trading at $300M FDV...) | 5 969 |
| 20 |  Pretty insane compression on $ZEC, I struggle to have a firm opinion on how this resolves | 6 126 |
