ar
Feedback
Crypto Narratives

Crypto Narratives

الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram

Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/ Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems

إظهار المزيد

📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Crypto Narratives

تُعد قناة Crypto Narratives (@cryptonarratives1) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 21 707 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 5 471 في فئة العملات المشفرة والمرتبة 1 842 في منطقة الولايات المتحدة.

📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك

منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 21 707 مشتركاً.

بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 30 يونيو, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار 137، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -6، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.

  • حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
  • معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 23.04‎%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 14.29‎% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
  • وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 4 999 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 3 100 مشاهدة.
  • التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 34.
  • الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل mstr, hype, chart, axs, eth.

📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى

يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/ Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems

بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 01 يوليو, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة العملات المشفرة.

21 707
المشتركون
-624 ساعات
+177 أيام
+13730 أيام

جاري تحميل البيانات...

الإشارات الواردة والصادرة
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب المشتركين
يوليو '26
يوليو '26
+14
في 6 قنوات
يونيو '26
+356
في 25 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '26
+392
في 15 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '26
+474
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '26
+273
في 11 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '26
+180
في 14 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '26
+286
في 21 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '25
+368
في 24 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '25
+501
في 14 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '25
+1 481
في 31 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '25
+708
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '25
+711
في 28 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '25
+494
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '25
+409
في 10 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '25
+838
في 31 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '25
+338
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '25
+452
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '25
+752
في 21 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '25
+882
في 20 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '24
+1 132
في 19 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '24
+2 145
في 22 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '24
+1 487
في 13 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '24
+2 825
في 8 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '24
+581
في 9 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '24
+396
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '24
+442
في 7 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '24
+1 207
في 8 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '24
+715
في 8 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '24
+1 167
في 10 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '24
+931
في 13 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '24
+725
في 5 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '23
+1 011
في 6 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '23
+476
في 6 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '23
+223
في 4 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '23
+2 009
في 0 قنوات
التاريخ
نمو المشتركين
الإشارات
القنوات
01 يوليو+14
منشورات القناة
One no-brainer improvement for $STRC and $SATA (but it obviously won't be very useful in the near-term) is to let it float above $100, maybe to $110 STRC is trying to defy the laws of physics by having both a stable price and a quasi-stable yield (in the sense that the yield moves extremely slowly) while being backed by a very volatile asset This is something that can't work, and it results in increased volatility to the downside once BTC dumps, because the 'forced' ATM at $100 leads to the absorption of 'too much demand' at $100, and an inorganic increase of the market cap that happens too fast to get digested properly. The other problem with guaranteeing the ATM at $100 is that it offers a zero-downside short trade (except yield+funding but these are very low on a short timeframe), while at the same time capping the upside for holders (they only get the volatility to the downside). It's sub-optimal on a lot of levels except on getting levered quickly at the expense of future price instability.

2
Robinhood and $DYDX both have an announcement to make today so I expect them to be related... DYDX is up almost 2x in a week. We will most likely sell the news after the announcement but the question is whether the token first pumps hard (like ZRO in February) or not.
1 599
3
BTC is repeatedly trying to break the $59k support and make new bear market lows but the TL seems to be super chill and is basically not caring
1 810
4
There is no incentive for Saylor to buyback STRC at this level The SEC filing is all about signaling I strongly doubt he's going to repurchase STRC above $70, I don't even think he would do it above $50. If he's selling BTC to buy STRC, then the chart that should matter is STRC/BTC. I don't expect this chart to collapse so I don't think it would be interesting for him to buyback STRC STRC is now basically a STRF-like pref that is floating, bringing it back to $100 is not that important anymore (*as the issuer that is focusing on limiting damage and not issuing more in the short-term*) because no one believes it must trade at $100 anymore He will probably keep the dividend rate at 12%, which is a clean 1% for month, easy to remember. Everybody kind of agrees that it would be useless to try to increase it enough for the asset to trade back at par anyway, so there's no incentive to increase it either.
3 048
5
Some people are holding millions of $ worth of locked $LAB tokens and the 1st unlocks are approaching so they try to hedge th
Some people are holding millions of $ worth of locked $LAB tokens and the 1st unlocks are approaching so they try to hedge their positions by shorting but they are getting completely smoked with a -10000% annualized funding rate They won't let you get away with that money, dawg
3 409
6
The only trade I took so far on $SYN is shorting the squeeze to $0.65, it was a scalp that I close in a few hours My criteria
The only trade I took so far on $SYN is shorting the squeeze to $0.65, it was a scalp that I close in a few hours My criteria for shorting was a hourly candle with $150M+ volume, and this is the only candle that came close to it, it was a very obvious short on LTF But what's more important is that by respecting this "volume saturation" rule before shorting, you are preventing yourself from taking shorts with much less certainty of being a win. Right now I'm once again waiting for another high-volume squeeze that will almost certainly be a winning short. Could I have just longed a dip? Yeah sure, but I don't have the conviction required to do that, so I'm not trying to force trades that I don't like. Taking less trades with more conviction is basically always a good idea.
3 258
7
I guess that makes it 6 attempts?
I guess that makes it 6 attempts?
3 610
8
Cavalry has arrived
Cavalry has arrived
3 600
9
Buying the dip on $MU MU is the new NVDA
Buying the dip on $MU MU is the new NVDA
3 625
10
One of the key messages from this SEC filing is 'I won't be as free to make some stupid decisions like using the USD reserve to buyback converts anymore'
3 444
11
Most bullish reaction from the SEC filing is on STRC which makes sense because it was the most irrationally sold off
Most bullish reaction from the SEC filing is on STRC which makes sense because it was the most irrationally sold off
3 409
12
Summary: - USD Reserve policy: they are now committing to having at least 1y worth of dividends in it. They are also promising that it won't be used for anything other than div payments. - STRC dividend: basically there is no clear guidance anymore, they are not guaranteeing a dividend increase even if it trades below par. - STRC + other prefs buyback program: they are announcing that they might do it, but haven't done anything yet => Signal that they could buy these back if their price goes low enough - MSTR buyback program: they are announcing that they might do it, but haven't don't anything yet. => Signal that MSTR mNAV *could* be defended below some threshold - They remind everyone that they could be selling BTC for all sort of purposes, but still only sold MSTR and not BTC last week even at depressed mNAV - They sold $1.1bn worth of MSTR shares to replenish the USD reserve, which now covers almost 1.5 year worth of dividends https://x.com/saylor/status/2071565162377568377
6 479
13
Is there any reason for $MON not to go sub $1bn FDV in the coming months? Now that it failed repeatedly at being in an uptren
Is there any reason for $MON not to go sub $1bn FDV in the coming months? Now that it failed repeatedly at being in an uptrend, there's no reason to hold it anymore and it's a $2bn FDV alt L1 with 0 volume (The anti-bearish case is ‘it’s a $2bn FDV coin with 0 volume, so it’s cornered enough not to die?’)
3 333
14
The gold and silver blowoff tops marking a multi-month (year?) top looks incredibly likely just based on their chart but call+1
The gold and silver blowoff tops marking a multi-month (year?) top looks incredibly likely just based on their chart but calling it at the time when everyone was bulled up didn't feel comfortable at all
3 694
15
Buying a scam coin after a huge retrace, *if* price action stabilizes, can be a good r/r trade $VELVET
Buying a scam coin after a huge retrace, *if* price action stabilizes, can be a good r/r trade $VELVET
3 830
16
That was 4 opportunities to break below $60k in three days for bears Even if it eventually breaks, we should get some short-t
That was 4 opportunities to break below $60k in three days for bears Even if it eventually breaks, we should get some short-term relief?
4 145
17
Several days at $1bn+ volume on the Binance perp contract means we're very close to a local top on a large cap TAO TON XLM NEAR WLD are the 5 most recent examples of that volume saturation HYPE and ZEC are in a different league because their baseline volume is already very high, so the criteria doesn't work on them
4 146
18
The list hasn't really changed today, and a few of these coins are up >10% from yesterday prices
3 989
19
I outlined the worst-case scenario for STRC in my article: back then the USD reserve was still worth 2 years+ which was defin+1
I outlined the worst-case scenario for STRC in my article: back then the USD reserve was still worth 2 years+ which was definitely much better than the current 10 months, but the overall picture doesn't change. In a distressed scenario, I imagined a 40% discount (ie $STRC at $60) with a 15% dividend rate, making the effective yield 25%. This is obviously a ballpark estimate that entirely depends on BTC price, but that's precisely my point: STRC price is a function of BTC, and if you expect BTC to go really low, it will obviously impact STRC+MSTR. But up until the past few weeks, most people didn't have BTC bottom price expectations that were low enough to justify being as bearish as they were on the MSTR complex. You can't have your own rational estimate of STRC price if you don't take your expected BTC price trajectory as an input. If you think BTC is trending to zero long-term, then yeah the fair price of STRC is probably extremely low ($10-$20?) If you think BTC is entering a dramatic bear market that will tremendously hurt MSTR, then the fair price of STRC might be something like $30-$50? If you think BTC will chop for like 2 years, just enough to negatively impact the bitcoin per share of Strategy and make it a significantly less important actor in the next bull market, then the fair price of STRC might be like $50 - $70? If you think BTC is close to a bottom, then the fair price of STRC is probably quite close to $100.
4 392
20
At the same time, XLM WLD NEAR INJ are looking cooked among the coins that pumped recently They are obviously not the only on+2
At the same time, XLM WLD NEAR INJ are looking cooked among the coins that pumped recently They are obviously not the only ones, as you can see on the screenshots below, most coins are very ugly (HBAR, ADA, PUMP, etc)
4 012