Dr. John Campbell

Simple questions for Pfizer Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Unethical drug and vaccine ads Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

WHO admits excess deaths Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Multinational agreement Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Freedom of speech Facebook Bowed to White House Pressure, Removed Covid Posts Internal Meta emails say pressure from Washington was behind a decision to take down posts attributing pandemic to man-made virus LINK1 LINK2 Email from Nick Clegg Asked why company was removing rather than labelling or demoting post about viral origins Facebook vice-president in charge of content policy “We were under pressure from the administration and others to do more,” “We shouldn’t have done it.” Jim Jordan, Republican house judiciary committee “documents begin to reveal the pressure that Facebook and other social media companies were under to alter their content moderation policies, and remove protected speech to appease the federal government, particularly the Biden White House”. First Amendment https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. New hope children centre https://www.newhopeuplands.org/ Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Drug companies Gave £7.5m to royal colleges in the years 2015 to 2022, (for which data were available) Royal College of Physicians, £ 2.8 million Royal College of GPs, £2.4 million The biggest donor overall was Pfizer £1.8m of payments Novo Nordisk with £730 000 Daiichi Sankyo with £478 000 Since 2012 the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland Has refused to take any sponsorship from drug companies, noting, research “overwhelmingly” shows that clinicians are influenced by industry marketing, and that this affects prescribing. Emma Hardy, All Party Parliamentary Group on Surgical Mesh Implants. “Medicine is literally a matter of life and death, and patients must be confident they are receiving the best treatment available for the right reasons.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-45604199 Up to 170,000 people who have had hernia mesh implants in England in the past six years could face complications, Margaret McCartney, GP, former Royal College of General Practitioners trustee and council member “Even if we are told the information is independent, funding skews the types of education or information that gets made,” “It means that we become less independent, because we are not setting our own priorities, and that’s bad for the profession.” Conflict of interest scandals In March 2023 the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry temporarily suspended the drug company Novo Nordisk, because of “serious breaches” of the association’s code of practice. (The ABPI only saves the data on payments for the most recent three years and deletes historical data) Data compiled from Disclosure UK An online database run by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), (where drug companies disclose payments to healthcare organisations, patient groups, and health professionals, who have consented for these payments to be made public) Piotr Ozieranski, (Bath University), and Shai Mulinari, (Lund University) Payments were reported under wide categories, were changed without explanation, or were inconsistent between data sources. It is impossible to tell how much money goes to each recipient, “without many hours of forensic work,” Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Big Pharma funds medical establishment Royal colleges in the UK Have received more than £9m in marketing payments from drug and medical devices companies since 2015 The Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of General Practitioners, biggest recipients of industry money https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/382/bmj.p1658.full.pdf BMJ 2023;382:p1658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1658 Published: 26 July 2023 Medical royal colleges do not always disclose publicly the millions of pounds they receive from drug and medical device companies. The BMJ asked the colleges to disclose all payments from industry …. but they all refused to do so. The colleges are not obliged to disclose these payments; they are not included in their annual reports, and are only available through voluntary industry transparency initiatives, which experts say have severe limitations. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

defined as acute dynamic increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration, above the sex-specific upper-limit of normal on day 3 (48-96h) after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause. 777 participants Median age 37 years, 69.5% women 40 participants (5.1%) had elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentration on day 3 (Taken as above the 99th percentile for age and sex) mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was adjudicated in 22 participants (2.8%). One in 35 recipients (2.8%) had vaccine-associated myocardial injury Of the 777, 2 women had chest pain Of these 22 cases with mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury Twenty cases occurred in women Two in men Hs-cTnT-elevations were mild and only temporary. No patient had ECG- changes, none developed major adverse cardiac events within 30 days In the overall booster cohort hs-cTnT concentrations, on day 3 Median 5 ng/L, IQR, 4-6 Matched controls (n=777), 3 ng/L IQR, 3-5 Significantly higher p less than 0.001 (If elevated on day3, given warning, investigations and advice) No MACE (major adverse cardiac events) within 30 days Cases had comparable systemic reactogenicity Concentrations of cytokines and cytokine antagonists were markers quantifying systemic inflammation Lower concentrations GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor) induces the development of monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, and myeloid and dermal dendritic cells. IFN- λ1(IL-29) a group of anti-viral cytokines, that consists of four IFN-λ molecules Conclusion mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was more common than previously thought, being mild and transient, and more frequent in women versus men. The possible protective role of IFN-λ1(IL-29) and GM-CSF warrant further studies. Similar Pfizer studies A prospective study on myocardial injury after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 fourth dose vaccination in healthy persons https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36097844/ A prospective study on myocardial injury after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 fourth dose vaccination in healthy persons https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.2687 NZ Pfizer add LINK New hope children centre https://www.newhopeuplands.org/ Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

One in 35 Myocardial Injury after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (ESC Heart Failure, open-access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology) Prospective active surveillance study (Not a retrospective passive surveillance study) Industry independent, instigated by the investigators Aims Incidence and potential mechanisms of oligosymptomatic myocardial injury, following COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination. Safety net for those already boosted, screening and prevention of complications Methods and Results December 2021 to February 2022 Hospital employees scheduled to undergo mRNA-1273 booster vaccination, assessed for mRNA-1273 vaccination-associated myocardial injury, 👇 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Vitamin D status in the United States, 2011–2014 https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/110/1/150/5487983?login=false Persons with higher vitamin D dietary intake or who used supplements had lower prevalences of at risk of deficiency or inadequacy. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: an update on the current status worldwide https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-020-0558-y Most studies did not meet the basic requirements of a nutrient intervention study ~40% of Europeans are vitamin D deficient, and 13% are severely deficient Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D less than 50 nmol/L or 20 ng/ml), associated with unfavourable skeletal outcomes, including fractures and bone loss Level of more than 50 nmol/L or 20 ng/ml is, therefore, the primary treatment goal Severe vitamin D deficiency, below less than 30 nmol/L (or 12 ng/ml), dramatically increases the risk of excess mortality, infections, and many other diseases, and should be avoided whenever possible. Given its rare side effects and its relatively wide safety margin, it may be an important, inexpensive, and safe adjuvant therapy for many diseases, but future large and well-designed studies should evaluate this further. Vitamin D supplementation and incident dementia: Effects of sex, APOE, and baseline cognitive status https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dad2.12404 Vitamin D exposure was associated with 40% lower dementia incidence versus no exposure. (Prospective, n = 12,388) Low vitamin D serum levels as risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://ejnpn.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41983-023-00676-w Serum vitamin D levels, related to cognitive dysfunctions, e.g. dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease Past studies vary in results on whether vitamin D levels correlated with the development of AD. Meta-analysis, up to December 2022 AD, 75% of dementias Results 6 studies, n = 10,884 Vitamin D receptors throughout the brain Patients, vitamin D serum levels (less than 25 ng/ml), had an increased risk of developing AD, compared to more than 25 ng/ml HR: 1.59 Severe deficiency (less than 10 ng/ml) having the strongest association, compared to moderate vitamin D deficiency (10–20 ng/ml). Vitamin D may promote the clearing of amyloid plaques Vitamin D also prevents cognitive dysfunction via neuroprotection, neurotrophy, neurotransmission, and neuroplasticity Potential to prevent neuroinflammation, inhibits proinflammatory cytokines https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vitamin-d-for-vulnerable-groups/vitamin-d-and-clinically-extremely-vulnerable-cev-guidance In the UK during autumn and winter, everyone is advised to take a supplement containing, 10 micrograms (400 international units) of vitamin D a day https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/ Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Common deficiency and dementia Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among US adults: prevalence, predictors and clinical implications https://www.cambridge.org/core/journa... (University of Michigan School of Medicine, 2018) Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and insufficiency (VDI) are increasing at a global level Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) measurements were collected from 26,010 adults (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES) VDD, less than 50 nmol/l (20 ng ml) VDI, 50 to 75 nmol/l (20 – 25 ng ml) Prevalence VDD, 28·9% VDI, 41·4 % Adults who were black, less educated, poor, obese, physically inactive and infrequent milk consumers Obese adults, 3·09 times higher prevalence of VDD (1·80 times higher prevalence of VDI) Physically inactive adults, 2·00 times VDD (1·36 times higher prevalence of VDI) Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Excess deaths, lack of debate Similar pattern of excess deaths in many countries around the world ONS, UK, week ending 7 July 2023 (Week 27), LINK1 Deaths registered in the UK, 11,147, (2.9% above) LINK2 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Through July 3rd, 2023. All autopsy studies that include COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis as a possible cause of death were included Causality in each case Determined by three independent reviewers with cardiac pathology experience and expertise. Results Initially identified 1,691 studies After screening, 14 papers, 28 autopsy cases. (The cardiovascular system was the only organ system affected in 26 cases) In 2 cases, myocarditis a consequence from multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS). Number of days from last COVID-19 vaccination until death We established that all 28 deaths were causally linked to COVID-19 vaccination by independent adjudication. Conclusions Temporal relationship, internal and external consistency Deceased, with known COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis Pathobiological mechanisms Related excess death Complemented with autopsy confirmation Independent adjudication Application of the Bradford Hill criteria Overall epidemiology of vaccine myocarditis suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death from suspected myocarditis, in cases where sudden, unexpected death has occurred in a vaccinated person. Urgent investigation is required for the purpose of risk stratification, and mitigation, in order to reduce the population occurrence of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. More information Most cases had symptoms consistent with myocarditis prior to death, (chest pain, effort intolerance) Choi et al, a 22-year-old Korean man Autopsy showed intense inflammation and destruction of cardiac tissue including the conduction system. Other cases had no reported symptoms before death. Gill et al reported two boys, age 16 and 17, who died a few days after mRNA injection while asleep at home. Autopsies revealed patchy inflammation suggesting that sudden arrhythmic death had occurred. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Microscopic evidence Yes, and how many times can a man turn his head. And pretend that he just doesn’t see (Bob Dylan) Free downloads of John's books and Simon's posters. https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ Autopsy Proven Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202307.1198/v1 COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to myocarditis which in some circumstances can be fatal. This systematic review aims to investigate potential causal links between COVID-19 vaccines and death from myocarditis using post-mortem analysis. A systematic review of all published autopsy reports involving COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

I live in Alberta, Canada. I worked for a group of general practitioners during the height of covid and the vaccine implementation. I can tell you first hand that the physicians I worked for purposefully did NOT report vaccine side effects regardless of their legal obligation to due so. When I inquired about it, it was strongly implied that I mind my own business. Interesting. I am in BC and know my reported side affects were not reported as asked later and was told could not tell me and did not know who to direct me to. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

In Western Australia LINK Total AEFI rate following a COVID-19 vaccine was 264.1 per 100,000 doses. 26.41 per 10 thousand 2.641 per thousand 0.241% How to report in Australia https://aems.tga.gov.au https://aems.tga.gov.au/privacy/ https://aems.tga.gov.au/report-unregistered/?id=2da2d6a9-0d26-ee11-8172-005056a9ce6f How to report in UK https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk How to report in the US https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index.jsp Yellow Card: Yellow card scheme, Don’t wait for someone else to report it LINK It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported. Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003 12 countries, 43 numerical estimates of under-reporting. The median under-reporting rate across the 37 studies was 94% In primary care Non serious, 95% under reported Serious or severe, 80% under reported Hospital based More severe or serious, 85% to 95% under reported As an Australian I feel utterly let down. Grateful for WA for making this report available, but it leaves such a bad taste in the mouth to know how we were lied to. I did not want the vaccine and felt pushed from all sides to get it. As a West Australian I can say that doctors were discouraged to report adverse events and were reprimanded if they reported too many. The red flag system in Australia took about 45mins to report and doctors were not paid to do so. This data is absolutely doctored and controlled. I fled WA to another State with my family as soon as the unvaccinated could travel outside of the State domestically. I work in the medical field and lived in a suburb surrounded by the medical profession. The GPs who weren't afraid to report these events started getting phone calls from the Department of Health questioning their opinions and asking them to retract their reports and registrars/junior doctors working in hospitals were told to remove vaccine injury from patient notes by senior staff. My mother was vaccine injured and did not report it to the VAERS system. I imagine others like her are part of why the US has poor data on vaccine side effects. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Adverse reactions and under reporting New hope children centre, https://www.newhopeuplands.org It is generally acknowledged that adverse events are under-reported around the world, LINK with estimates that 90-95% of adverse events are not reported to regulators. In recent years evidence has emerged that adverse event reports from consumers contain information that is useful for monitoring the safety of therapeutic products, but there is low awareness of available reporting systems. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

What do you think the culture was in the health care services during the vaccine role out, was it to encourage reporting of potential adverse events or was the culture to discourage reporting to WAVSS? In WA in 2020, 2,071,167 doses of pre-covid (traditional) vaccines were given to the population as a whole, this resulted in 270 reports of adverse events following immunisation. For the 3,948,673 COVID-19 vaccines given in 2021, there were 10,726 individual AEFI reports in 2021. (97% of these reports followed covid vaccination) What do you think this tells us about the frequency of adverse events following covid vaccines in comparison to traditional vaccines? This is a horrendous volume of adverse events following immunisation. Do you feel the rate of adverse events would be equally high throughout the rest of Australia? (or was WA a ‘special case’) Total reported AEFI rate following a COVID-19 vaccine was 264.1 per 100,000 doses. For non-covid (traditional) vaccinations in WA, during the same 2021-time frame there were 11.1 events per 100,000 doses. Why did we had to waite until July 2023 to get this data? Should this have been seen as a ‘red flag’ by the regulators contemporaneously in 2021? If so, what should they have done about the problem? Some of the important AEFI that have been specifically monitored by the TGA-coordinated national surveillance vaccine safety program include, Anaphylaxis, Thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome (TTS), Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Myopericarditis, Chest pain, Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism and Bell’s palsy, to name but a few. Given that we know all of this now, how should this effect the regulatory approval of the current mRNA vaccines? In 2021 there were 1,125 appointments made at the adult vaccine safety clinic at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, up from seven appointments made in 2020. Do you consider this level of referrals indicated the vaccines were safe? In 2021 there were 439 appointments made at the Perth Children’s Hospital specialist immunisation clinic, up from 214 in 2020. Does this have any implications for vaccinating children with covid vaccines? This is a quote from the report ‘Adverse events of special interest (AESI) were monitored by the Department during the COVID-19 vaccination program.’ Does this imply that the regulators knew about these adverse events early on, since they knew to look out for them? If these adverse reactions were known about in 2021, is it almost like the population were being used to gather data on these adverse reactions, rather than protecting them? As a Senator, you have been trying to question the quality assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, the logic of vaccine mandates as well as many other policy areas – Do you feel you have been punished for your stance? Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Excess deaths with Senator Rennick Senator Gerard Rennick (Queensland) in an open discussion about excess deaths and vaccine related issues in Australia. Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance – Annual Report 2021 https://www.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Corp/Documents/Health-for/Immunisation/Western-Australia-Vaccine-Safety-Surveillance-Annual-Report-2021.pdf Western Australia had implemented a stringent lockdown of borders and there were virtually NO cases of Covid-19 in Western Australia during 2021. The vaccine role out began February 2021. So that demonstrates the adverse reactions resulted directly from the Covid-19 vaccines and NOT the Covid-19 virus. Is there something here for the rest of Australia and indeed the world to learn from? Of all the adverse events following immunisation that took place in the WA population, what percentage would you estimate were actually reported to the Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance (WAVSS)? Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Excess deaths, the silence Excess deaths, Dr. Vibeke Manniche. Leading medical researcher in Denmark I have also recorded two videos on this interesting and concerning paper from Danish research. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998 This is my video discussing the paper directly. https://t.me/DrJohnCampbell/174 This second video is a detailed discussion with the lead author, Dr. Vibeke Manniche https://t.me/DrJohnCampbell/175 This is our online abuse video; https://t.me/DrJohnCampbell/187 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell