Dr. John Campbell
Open in Telegram
My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care.
Show more6 893
Subscribers
+2924 hours
+657 days
+4530 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '24
September '24
+155
in 4 channels
August '24
+87
in 3 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+80
in 8 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+113
in 7 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+132
in 8 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+197
in 7 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+218
in 17 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+427
in 20 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+288
in 5 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+130
in 6 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+139
in 4 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+235
in 3 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+252
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+247
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+251
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+256
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+592
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+301
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+397
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+579
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+536
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+312
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+430
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+268
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+154
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+173
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+261
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+70
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+55
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+105
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+898
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 25 September | 0 | |||
| 24 September | +2 | |||
| 23 September | +3 | |||
| 22 September | +2 | |||
| 21 September | 0 | |||
| 20 September | 0 | |||
| 19 September | +2 | |||
| 18 September | +2 | |||
| 17 September | +2 | |||
| 16 September | +1 | |||
| 15 September | +3 | |||
| 14 September | +3 | |||
| 13 September | +1 | |||
| 12 September | +3 | |||
| 11 September | +15 | |||
| 10 September | +8 | |||
| 09 September | +41 | |||
| 08 September | +29 | |||
| 07 September | +29 | |||
| 06 September | +2 | |||
| 05 September | 0 | |||
| 04 September | 0 | |||
| 03 September | +1 | |||
| 02 September | +5 | |||
| 01 September | +1 |
Channel Posts
https://t.me/DrJohnCampbell/326
👆👆👆
Background
Venous thromboses have been linked to several COVID-19 vaccines
Here we describe a case of post-Moderna COVID-19 vaccination arterial infarct,
with vaccine-associated diffuse cortical edema,
that was complicated by refractory intracranial hypertension.
Case summary
24 hrs after receiving her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine,
a 30-year-old female developed severe headache.
Three weeks later she was admitted with subacute headache and confusion.
Imaging initially showed scattered cortical thrombosis with an elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture.
An external ventricular drain was placed,
but she continued to have elevated intracranial pressure.
Ultimately, she required a hemicraniectomy,
but intractable cerebral edema resulted in her death.
Pathology was consistent with thrombosis and associated inflammatory response.
Conclusion
Though correlational, her medical team surmised that the mRNA vaccine may have contributed to this presentation.
The side effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccination are still incompletely understood.
Though complications are rare, clinicians should be aware of presentations like this one.
More information
Had prior asymptomatic COVID-19 infection three months earlier
24-hours after first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna).
Developed severe, atypical throbbing bi-frontal headache
Headaches were atypical
(no prior headaches)
Three weeks after vaccination
Developed blurred vision and confusion
Bifrontal headache with photophobia
Lumbar puncture revealed lymphocytosis
Broad spectrum antimicrobial coverage was started.
Her mental status acutely worsened later that evening
New left hemiparesis.
Elevated D-dimer
CSF cultures and PCR testing returned negative
Intracranial pressure remained refractory to maximal medical management,
including deep sedation, paralysis and hypothermia,
prompting a right decompressive hemicraniectomy.
The patient expired from refractory cerebral edema.
Brain autopsy showed infiltrates of CD8 and CD4-positive T-cells,
in association with intravascular thrombi
Fungal and bacterial stains were negative.
Discussion
Diffuse endothelial damage and vessel wall inflammation,
suggested an underlying pro-thrombotic state and T cell inflammatory response.
The arterial infarct in this case is likely related to a pro-thrombotic state
Due to the large volume of infarction, the patient was not started on anticoagulation after extensive discussion of the risks vs potential benefit.
In summary, administration of COVID-19 vaccine was considered a possible cause of the extensive multifocal arterial thromboses with associated inflammatory response and elevated intracranial pressure given the temporal association.
The mechanism for initial elevation in intracranial pressure is not known but may relate to cerebral autoregulatory changes in the setting of cortical microvascular thrombosis.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fatal-post-covid-19-mrna-vaccine
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) such as this would have put a pause on the entire study and an investigation into why this happened and a call for risk mitigation measures to prevent the same complication from happening to more subjects.
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell
| 2 | Stroke and death after Moderna
Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/
Keywords: COVID-19; Moderna vaccine; cerebral edema; neurology; stroke.
McMillan N, Rosenberg HJ, Anderson MP, Pal P, Stephenson K, Fehnel CR. Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia. Neurohospitalist. 2023 Apr;13(2):156-158. doi: 10.1177/19418744221136898. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PMID: 37064937; PMCID: PMC10091442.
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.👇👇👇
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 3 | Agreement on aspiration
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 4 | Midazolam deaths
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 5 | Vaccine injury update
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 6 | In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs
No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection
This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue
In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI
The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at
Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment
Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom
The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts
But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products
And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 7 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?
https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally
An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs
Case File Number: VID510/2023
Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd
Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.
The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000
Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.
First, an Organism is:
‘any biological entity’
‘capable of transferring genetic material’
The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes
These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law
The modRNA is genetic material
The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body
The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells
By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection
So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes
The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is:
an organism that has been modified by gene technology
The Gene Technology part requires showing:
any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.
Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products
The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA
In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.
Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques
So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied
This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs
Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence
Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia
Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000👇
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 8 | And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 9 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?
https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally
An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs
Case File Number: VID510/2023
Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd
Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.
The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000
Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.
First, an Organism is:
‘any biological entity’
‘capable of transferring genetic material’
The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes
These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law
The modRNA is genetic material
The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body
The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells
By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection
So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes
The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is:
an organism that has been modified by gene technology
The Gene Technology part requires showing:
any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.
Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products
The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA
In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.
Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques
So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied
This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs
Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence
Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia
Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000
In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs
No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection
This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue
In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI
The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at
Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment
Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom
The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts
But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products | 0 |
| 10 | Lack of GMO testing
Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 11 | Amputation after vaccination
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 12 | An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs
Case File Number: VID510/2023
Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd
Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.
The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000
Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.
First, an Organism is:
‘any biological entity’
‘capable of transferring genetic material’
The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes
These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law
The modRNA is genetic material
The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body
The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells
By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection
So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes
The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is:
an organism that has been modified by gene technology
The Gene Technology part requires showing:
any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.
Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products
The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA
In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.
Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques
So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied
This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs
Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence
Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia
Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000
In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs
No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection
This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue
In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI
The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at
Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment
Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom
The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts
But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products
And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 13 | Covert Genetically Modified Organisms
Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 14 | Bill Gates, new RNA vaccines
Bill Gates in on the case
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 15 | Helsinki
Dr. Aseem Malhotra, direct link to expert testimony in Finland
https://casecovidpass.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Dr-Aseem-Malhotra-testimony-before-Helsinki-District-Court-12-April-2024-in-Finland-MPXjVFzs8dE.mp3
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 16 | Inflammation
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 17 | New treatment blocked
Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)
Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.
He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.
Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.
Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan
https://www.cureus.com/articles/19627...
Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860
Conclusions
Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine.
These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,
rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.
Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.
Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 18 | ICYMI:
Harms to children
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 19 | ICYMI:
Excess deaths, MPs request data
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
| 20 | ICYMI:
Zero covid and smallpox
Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell | 0 |
