Dr. John Campbell

Dr Manniche and John are abused In order to talk to you, some of the world’s leading scientists and doctors are prepared to talk with me. This is of course a privilege that leaders in their field talk to me. However, there are individuals, and vested interests, that seek to be as deleterious to the individuals as possible. This is not only disrespectful, but hinders the open dialog of ideas that we all need to progress. Here, John and Dr Vibeke Manniche discuss abuse and threats they have experienced. This talk was based on the first video we recorded based on this new research on vaccine batches with different adverse reaction reports. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Number of deaths was above the five-year average Private homes, 22.9% above, (589 excess deaths) Hospitals, 6.1% above, (257 excess deaths) Care homes, 3.7% above, (70 excess deaths) The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week 11,763 8.8% above the five-year average (950 excess deaths) European excess deaths https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/recovery-dashboard/ https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=509982#Excess_mortality_in_the_EU_between_January_2020_and_May_2023 Excess mortality in the EU between January 2020 and May 2023 Followed the covid waves in 2020 and 2021 Following based on 2016-2019 EU data, 2022 January, + 8.1% February, + 8.3% March, + 6.7% April, + 12% May, + 8% June, + 8.4% July, + 17.1% 58, 000 additional deaths in the EU in July 2022 (2.8 % in July 2020, 11 500 excess deaths) (5.7 % in July 2021, 19 700 excess deaths) Auguste, + 13.9% (7.6 % in August 2020, 27 300 excess deaths) (9.1 % in August 2021, 36 000 excess deaths) September, + 10.3 % October, + 11.6% November, + 8.7% December, + 20.0 % 92, 500 additional deaths in December 2022 in the EU January-March, 2023 January, + 3.9 % February, -1.4 % March, + 0.9 % April, + 3.3 % (11, 900 additional deaths) May, + 2.9 % (8, 100 additional deaths) January 2020 to May 2023 1, 765, 000 additional deaths (compared with the average number for the same period in 2016-2019) 2020, 11.8 % higher 2021, 14.0 % higher 2022, 11.1 % higher First five months of 2023, 1.9 % higher In 2022 Romania (3.4 %) Sweden (3.9 %) Hungary (5.2 %) Cyprus (26.4 %) Malta (17.9 %) Finland (17.1 %) In the first five months of 2023 Bulgaria (-9.3 %) Romania (-9.0 %) Lithuania (-8.5 %) Ireland (10.2 %) Netherlands (9.5 %) Austria (9.3 %) Vaccine safety: content alleging that vaccines cause chronic side effects, outside of rare side effects that are recognized by health authorities https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/11161123?sjid=13083388330982415003-EU https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?sjid=13083388330982415003-EU Claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or WHO Claims that an approved COVID-19 vaccine will cause death, infertility, miscarriage, autism, or contraction of other infectious diseases Claims that COVID-19 vaccines will make people who receive them magnetic Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

European excess deaths ONS excess deaths data If you would like to support the work of campbellteaching, locally and around the world, donations are welcome using the PayPal link below. The link is under Lorimer Publications, which is the format I used to publish my text books. Thank you. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Week ending 30 June 2023 (Week 26) https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/30june2023 10,373 deaths were registered in England and Wales 129 of these deaths mentioned novel coronavirus (COVID-19), accounting for 1.2% of all deaths. Of the 129 deaths involving COVID-19 61.2% (79 deaths) had this recorded as the underlying cause of death Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

10,428 (97%) occurred after a COVID-19 vaccine Similar volume of reports in the rest of Australia (as reported by the Therapeutic Goods Administration) https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/article?f In Western Australia Total AEFI rate following a COVID-19 vaccine was 264.1 per 100,000 doses. 26.41 per 10 thousand 2.641 per thousand 0.241% Non covid vaccinations, WA, 2021 11.1 events per 100,000 doses 0.0111% Comparison with US in 2021 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/datasets.html 148.3 per 100,000 doses Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) 306.1 per 100,000 doses Comirnaty (Pfizer) 244.8 per 100,000 doses (US, 122 per 100,000) Spikevax (Moderna) 281.4 per 100,000 doses (US, 187 per 100,000) Why the difference? This likely reflects differences in the sensitivity of passive adverse event reporting systems between the two jurisdictions. Some of the important AEFI that have been specifically monitored TGA-coordinated national surveillance vaccine safety program Anaphylaxis Thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome (TTS) Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) Myocarditis Pericarditis Myopericarditis Chest pain Deep venous thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Bell’s palsy In 2021 1,125 appointments made at the adult vaccine safety clinic at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, up from seven in 2020. 439 appointments made at the Perth Children’s Hospital specialist immunisation clinic, up from 214 in 2020. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Bad Australian vaccine data Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance – Annual Report 2021 https://www.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Corp/Documents/Health-for/Immunisation/Western-Australia-Vaccine-Safety-Surveillance-Annual-Report-2021.pdf Report describes adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) Reported to Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance (WAVSS) system For vaccinations received in 2021. The format of this Annual Report differs, to enable description of the impact of the program COVID-19 vaccination started in February 2021 In 2021, Western Australia 5,756,723 vaccine doses were administered, up from 2,071,167 in 2020. Of this amount, 3,948,673 were COVID-19 vaccines In 2021, a significant increase in reports of AEFI 10,726 individual AEFI reports in 2021, up from 270 in 2020. (200 reports from Influenza and routine vaccinations in 2021) Of these AEFI, (adverse events following immunisation) Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

This means the upper airways are patrolled and protected for months after an episode of T cell stimulation As the upper airways are kept clear of viruses and bacteria the lower airways are protected from descending infection Therefore, infections such as influenza or covid may present as mild or even asymptomatic Such a protected person is therefore able to ‘compartmentalise’ the infection in the upper airways, preventing it from descending to the lower alveoli Physiologically, this system is protective but imperfect, for example a lot of the bacteria are digested in the stomach This means some people will be well protected from severe disease after covid or influenza infection, while others are not Giving an optimised strain of Haemophilus influenzae as an Immunobiotic can enhance the efficiency of this natural physiological system The administered Haemophilus influenzae is killed, so cannot reproduce to cause disease The administered Haemophilus influenzae is enteric coated, so it will be protected as it passes through the stomach, meaning it will reach the small intestine in large numbers This will provide lots of stimulation to the Peyer’s patches This is not a vaccination, it is an augmentation of a completely natural physiological system A tablet could probably be taken before every winter as an OTC (over the counter medication) Millions of acute exacerbations (going to the lungs) could be prevented The tablet would cost very little as an OTC, it’s just dead bugs Free textbook download, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

New form of immunization Bacteria such as Haemophilus influenzae stick to the respiratory mucosa Bacteria divide and colonise the mucosa (forming a microbiome) Bacteria are coughed up in sputum Sputum is swallowed, therefore bacteria are swallowed Most bacteria are simply digested in the stomach A small percentage make it through to the small intestine These bacteria are taken up by immune lymphoid tissue in the wall of the small intestine called Peyer’s patches Peyer’s patches recognise these bacteria as foreign Peyer’s patches produce a form of T helper cell to combat the infection These newly formed T cells migrate in the blood to the lungs, then into the lung mucosa Here the new T helper cells ‘help’ the activation of immune responses such as the formation of more neutrophils These neutrophils are phagocytic, they eat any foreign material, such as any bacteria and any virus. They are not fussy eaters; they eat any antigen. The person now enjoys ‘learned innate immunity’ As bacteria and viruses are eaten and internally digested in the upper part of the lungs, they are dead, so cannot migrate down to infect the alveoli, the gaseous exchange structures. As the alveoli are not infected, they do not become inflamed, therefore they do not fill up with inflammatory fluid leading to a consolidated pneumonia As these thin-walled alveoli are not infected, the viruses and bacteria are not present, so do not migrate into the blood leading to systemic illness. Therefore, in short, the person stays well As the T cells are very powerful stimulants of immunity and inflammation, we do not want them hanging around for a long time, therefore they are short lived in the lungs However, the neutrophils they have stimulated self-perpetuate over a longer period of time (probably about 10 months) Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

New safe form of immunization Professor Robert Clancy talks us through his newly developed oral preventive treatment, protecting against serious illness and death from respiratory infections. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

New WHO International Health Regulations concerns Mr Andrew Bridgen @AndrewBridgen addresses European Parliament👇 https://t.me/AndrewBridgen/13 Petition https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904 Article-by-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf WHOs ‘prospective’ on IHRs https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/international-health-regulations-amendments Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

We believe that there are now other major factors likely driving the continued increase in excess deaths. We're calling on the UK Government to take charge of the increasingly urgent cardiovascular disease crisis. Dr Charmaine Griffiths, BHF Chief Executive It is deeply troubling that so many more people with cardiovascular disease have lost their lives over the last three years. For years now, it has been clear that we are firmly in the grip of a heart and stroke care emergency. There is no time to waste – Government must take control of this crisis to give heart patients and their loved ones hope of a better and healthier future. Latest figures People waiting for time-sensitive cardiac care, 390,000 Average ambulance response times for heart attacks and strokes, above 30 minutes since the beginning of 2022 (December 2022 they breached 90 minutes) Lack of primary health care Concerns of a potential rise in heart problems linked to Covid-19 People with and without pre-existing heart conditions, who caught Covid-19 before the vaccine roll-out, (i.e., in 2020) 40 % per cent more likely to develop cardiovascular disease, five times more likely to die in the 18 months after infection. BHF wants Prioritisation of NHS heart care Renewed focus on preventing the causes of cardiovascular disease Supercharging cardiovascular research for new treatments and cures Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan, (Associate Medical Director) Covid-19 no longer fully explains the significant numbers of excess deaths involving cardiovascular disease. Then focuses on treatment difficulties Iatrogenesis LINK 3 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iatrogenic Induced unintentionally by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures Not mentioned Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Excess heart deaths Nearly 100,000 more deaths involving heart conditions and stroke than usual since pandemic began LINK 1 Surge in Heart Deaths: 500 more people dying every WEEK since pandemic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=819x0hs2yL8 Official excess deaths data LINK 2 Since the pandemic began On average, over 500 additional deaths a week from cardiovascular disease Included cardiovascular and cerebrovascular deaths More excess deaths involving cardiovascular conditions than any other disease groups A total of 96,540 extra cardiovascular deaths since February 2020 In the first year of the pandemic Covid-19 infection drove high numbers of excess deaths, Covid-19 have since fallen year-on-year, the number of deaths involving cardiovascular disease have remained high above expected levels. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Breast cancer prevention Many thanks to Dr. Nyjon Eccles for giving us such valuable insights into a natural approach to health. Also this video looks at breast health and prevention of bresat cancer. For more on the work of Dr. Eccles, check out The Natural Doctor on https://thenaturaldoctor.org/ Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Viral vaccine paper, Dr Vibeke Manniche Vaccine batches with different adverse reaction reports. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998 71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Viral Vaccine paper Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998 71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches Numbers of suspected adverse events (SAEs), after BNT612b2 mRNA vaccination in Denmark. 27 December 2020–11 January 2022, (population 5.8 million) (According to the number of doses per vaccine batch) Each dot represents a single vaccine batch. By 11 November 2022 (European area) 701 million doses of Pfizer given 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs) Clinical data on individual vaccine batch levels have not been reported (batch-dependent variation in the clinical efficacy and safety of authorized vaccines would appear to be highly unlikely) We therefore examined rates of SAEs between different BNT162b2 vaccine batches administered in Denmark Data on all SAE cases, Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) SAE seriousness was classified as non-serious, serious (hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability or congenital malformation) or SAE-related d**** Anonymized data SAEs were counted on a batch level by linking individual SAEs to the batch label(s) of BNT162b dose(s) 10,793,766 doses administered 4,026,575 persons 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches (2,340–814,320 doses per batch) 43,496 SAEs were registered in 13,635 persons 61,847 batch-identifiable SAEs, of which 14,509 (23.5%) were classified as severe, 579 (0.9%) were SAE-related d***** Unexpectedly Rates of SAEs per 1000 doses varied considerably between vaccine batches From 1 SAE per 20 doses given to I in many thousands to zero Variabilities Vaccine manufacturing Storage Transportation Clinical handling and control Administration technique Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

👆👆 Results, Type 1 diabetes incidence rates N = 38,149 youths First year of the pandemic, incidence rate ratio = 1.14 During months 13 to 24, incidence rate ratio = 1.27 (Expected 3% to 4% annual increase trends in Europe) Results, Type 2 diabetes incidence rates Ten studies reported incident in both periods. Eight studies, an increase incident of type 2 diabetes Results, DKA incidence rates Fifteen studies Incidence rate ratio = 1.26 Conclusions Future studies are needed to assess whether this trend persists, and may help elucidate possible underlying mechanisms to explain temporal changes. More from the study Some studies reported an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and new-onset diabetes. However, (challenges in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis), concerns about the validity of these studies. Data sets used in other studies did not capture asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 There is no clear mechanism by which COVID-19 could directly or indirectly lead to new-onset type 1 or 2 diabetes. Purported direct mechanisms SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2 is expressed on insulin-producing β cells There is no clear underlying mechanism explaining the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent increased risk of diabetes. Population-based studies suggest…. that the increase in incidence may be due to an immune-mediated mechanism. Proposed indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures that may be associated with diabetes (contrary to what would be expected based on the decrease in viral infections among children) ‘Catch-up’ could only influence the first year of the pandemic Reflection on yesterday’s lab leak video and biological war As someone who has spent a number of years studying biological warfare (BW) and ways to defend against it, I'm not convinced that the Wuhan virus was not meant to be a BW agent. High lethality isn't necessarily required to be an effective weapon; it just needs to be able to incapacitate a significant number of people. The incapacitated people are no longer able to do their jobs, and the added benefit to the employer of the weapon is that those incapacitated people now take up more resources and more people to treat them than if they died. Also, the genetic techniques that they used, techniques that made it difficult to identify any man-made changes, is in line with one of the main attractions of BW - plausible deniability. Thank you for your thorough, objective and thoughtful reports! Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Dramatic increase in Diabetes Incidence of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 30th June 2023, Toronto https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2806712 Key Points Analysis of 42 studies N = 102,984 youths (19 years and under) Incidence of type 1 diabetes was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic. The findings suggest the need to elucidate possible underlying mechanisms to explain temporal changes Synthesize estimates of changes in incidence rates Minimum observation period of 12 months during and 12 months before the pandemic (Also looked at incidence of DKA in new-onset diabetes during the pandemic.)👇👇 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

All IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon. WIV ACTIVITIES PERFORMED WITH OR ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE’S LIBERATION ARMY WIV personnel have worked with scientists associated with the PLA on public health-related research and collaborated on biosafety and biosecurity projects. Information available to the IC indicates that some of the research conducted by the PLA and WIV included work with several viruses, including coronaviruses, but no known viruses that could plausibly be a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2. For example, PLA researchers have used WIV laboratories for virology and vaccine-related work. Between 2017 and 2019, the WIV funded and conducted research projects to enhance China’s knowledge of pathogens and early disease warning capabilities for defensive and biosecurity needs of the military. WIV collaborated with the PLA on other vaccine and therapeutics relevant to coronaviruses. CORONAVIRUS RESEARCH AND RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORMED AT THE WIV We assess WIV scientists conducted extensive research on coronaviruses, which included animal sampling and genetic analysis. No any direct evidence that a specific research-related incident occurred involving WIV personnel before the pandemic that could have caused the COVID pandemic. WIV Coronavirus Research and Holdings The WIV probably maintains one of the world’s largest repositories of bat samples, which has enabled its coronavirus research WIV first possessed SARS-CoV-2 in late December 2019, when WIV researchers isolated and identified the virus from samples from patients diagnosed with pneumonia of unknown causes. Since 2019, some WIV researchers analyzed pangolin samples to better understand disease outbreaks in these animals. By the end of 2019, the WIV maintained distinct teams focused on MERS and SARS-related coronaviruses. Both teams separately used transgenic mouse models to better understand how the viruses infect humans Not mentioned Only one focus of outbreak No animal intermediate identified Poor WHO visits WIV may have begun developing two Covid vaccines in November 2019 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23780776-mwg-fdr-document-04-16-23 (Prior to 8th December 2018) U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan An increase in adult Influenza-Like-Illness (ILI) October to November 2019 (accompanied by negative results) statistically significantly higher than reported in the previous 5 years “By mid-October 2019, the dedicated team at the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan knew that the city had been struck by what was thought to be an unusually vicious flu season. The disease worsened in November.” China CDC None of the samples taken from the 18 animal species found in the market were positive for SARS- CoV-2. EcoHealth Alliance and NIH funding EcoHealth Alliance with the WIV, Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses Mid-October to mid-November 2019 WIV collected 20,000 bat and animal samples by 2019, but did not disclose all of the viruses Before 2019, the WIV published sequences in a public database, taken offline in September 2019 Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

US Intelligence final report National Intelligence Officer for Weapons of Mass Destruction and Proliferation https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf My impressions Many potential incriminating details from WIV are given Report then systematically tries to downplay the evidence IC genuinely does not know a lot of specifics Background Late March, US Congress, unanimously passed a law Everything US intelligence held on coronavirus origins must be made public. Public Law https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/619/text America’s director of National Intelligence Presidential backed order declassify and make public all information relating to the origins of Covid-19 All 18 agencies, within 90 days. (5 days late) A classified annex to this report includes information that was necessary to exclude from the unclassified portion of this report All agencies continue to assess that both a natural and laboratory-associated origin remain plausible hypotheses to explain the first human infection. Coronavirus research In 2013, the WIV collected animal samples from which they identified the bat coronavirus Variations in IC analytic views The National Intelligence Council the initial human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was caused by natural exposure to an infected animal that carried SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor, a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS- CoV-2. The Department of Energy and the Federal Bureau of Investigation a laboratory-associated incident was the most likely cause of the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 Most agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not laboratory-adapted; some are unable to make a determination. Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

December 16th 2020 London, and parts of Essex and Hertfordshire, are placed into tier three of England's COVID tier system following an increase in case numbers in those areas https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9068/ Reintroducing a tiered system (December 2020) On 2 December, the tiered system was reintroduced with modifications. On 19 December, the Prime Minister announced that a fourth tier would be introduced, following concerns about a rising number of coronavirus cases due to a new variant (what was to become known as the Alpha variant, first identified in Kent). Questions Were these people told things about the effectiveness (or lack of) of lockdowns the public were not told? Were these people told things about the risks of infection (or lack of) to themselves the public were not told? Were these people told things about anything else, and if so by whom? Did seniors know about this party? Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell

Party time Tory party during lockdown December 2020 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/06/18/michael-gove-tory-lockdown-party-honours/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12206777/Tory-staff-filmed-drinking-dancing-joking-lockdown-rules-boozy-2020-Christmas-party.html Conservative Campaign Headquarters, London December 2020 Staffers working for recently honoured 'Lord Bailey' Dancing and joking about defying lockdown rules At least 24 revellers Two dancing officials, twirling each other past signs saying 'please keep your distance' Staff members heard laughing, hopes that they are not exposed for 'bending the rules.' One man, 'Oh ******.' 'Are you filming this?' 'Er, it's for the party use.' A man then laughs after declaring: 'As long as we are not streaming that we're, like, bending the rules.' One of those captured, Ben Mallett, a senior Tory aide, awarded an OBE Michael Gove ‌“The decision to confer honours on people was one that was made by Boris Johnson as an outgoing prime minister. Outgoing prime ministers have that right,” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/03/tier-1-lockdown-rules-in-england-latest-covid-restrictions-explained https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_England_(Julyâ%C2%80%C2%93December_2020 December 8th 2020 Health Secretary, Matt Hancock urges Londoners to adhere to COVID-19 regulations as cases rise in London. December 10th 2020 Health Secretary announces that mass testing will be rolled out for secondary schools in the worst affected areas of London, Kent and Essex Join👉🏻 @DrJohnCampbell