en
Feedback
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Open in Telegram

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Show more

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Channel Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 132 939 subscribers, ranking 390 in the Politics category and 158 in the USA region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 132 939 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 23 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -2 649 over the last 30 days and by -45 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 18.31%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 0 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 24 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Politics category.

132 939
Subscribers
-4524 hours
-6247 days
-2 64930 days
Posts Archive
Packets consist of two portions: the header and the payload. The header contains information about the packet, such as its origin and destination IP addresses (an IP address is like a computer's mailing address). The payload is the actual data

I have not seen Mike Lindells PCAPs and don’t know the circumstances and data he has, but this could potentially be HUGE if he is able to verify and properly analyze what happened on the networks on election night.

If election management software sent packets over the internet without at least enabling TLS, then that indicates that they are careless at implementing security at the least, and might even be potentially malicious.

The barrier to entry to use TLS is very low. It takes but a minute to enable on a server or software, and takes seconds as an end-user (https is TLS, http isnt).

Now let’s assume that the sender/receiver of the packets didn’t use TLS. If Mike’s team was able to run the packet capturing mechanism somewhere along the network routes that the election data took, and TLS was not enabled, then we can essentially conclude that He. Has. It. All.

If we assume TLS was enabled, then Mike Lindell would only be able to get intelligible PCAPs if the person logging the packets was either the sender, receiver, or cracked the encryption of the packets. If Mike’s team was able to crack TLS then we will have a major problem for anybody who uses the internet. There are man-in-the-middle techniques which could grab packets thought to be end-to-end encrypted but very few groups are in position to do so. (see: nsa, cloudflare, etc).

If Mike Lindell has PCAPs that prove there was a cyber operation that targeted the election networks, then first we need to think about how he got the PCAPs.

Now let’s think for a second about Mike Lindell’s PCAPs.

Only the recipient and sender of the packet will know what the packet contains if TLS is used.

TLS, or Transfer Layer Security, encrypts your data before sending it over the network. If anybody captures your packets while youre using TLS, then they just see a garbled mess.

Now why isn’t everyone’s online bank account getting hacked every day by people who get the smart idea to run packet capturing software?

Since packets are sent back and forth constantly with any amount of jumps or networks in between, anybody along the route could theoretically capture the packets holding your online banking password and steal your money.

Just having 100 Gorillabytes of packet captures means nothing on its own since packets are being sent constantly back and forth over the internet. The fact that you are able to read this message means you are receiving packets in real time.

Packets are relayed over many nodes and jumps between the origin and the recipient. Any of these relays or networks in between are able to capture packets which pass through.

PCAP is an abbreviation for “Packet Capture”. Data travels over the internet in packets that can be easily intercepted with specifically designed software or hardware.

Mike Lindell’s PCAPs are very important and might be absolute proof of a cyber operation that targeted the election. I say “might” because PCAPs are a very specific thing and would need to be proven with analysis before we know for sure.

Gen Flynn should consider putting out a statement about his involvement in the companies close to Pegasus. I’m curious as to the extent of what he knew regarding Pegasus and the targets of the software.

My dad’s website 8kun is still online even though large swaths of the internet are offline.

Everyone is crashing, but my website is Still up. https://8kun.top/index.html

Hearing lots of websites and networks are crashing. Last time this happened at this scale was October 2016 when Assange’s deadman switch was rumored to have been triggered. I wonder if anybody has a deadman’s switch that is scheduled to be triggered today... Surely they wont shut down the internet over some larp telegram channel marketing NFTs?