es
Feedback

¡No caigas en manos de tramposos! Telemetrio encuentra y marca estos canales 👉 Si quieres ver la etiqueta, suscríbete

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ir al canal en Telegram

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Mostrar más

📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

El canal Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 123 199 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 435 en la categoría Política y el puesto 165 en la región EEUU.

📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica

Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 123 199 suscriptores.

Según los últimos datos del 29 octubre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -2 037, y en las últimas 24 horas de -75, conservando un alto alcance.

  • Estado de verificación: No verificado
  • Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 16.09%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 16.84% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
  • Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 19 837 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 20 761 visualizaciones.
  • Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 409.

📝 Descripción y política de contenido

El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]”

Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 30 octubre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Política.

Buy Ad
123 199
Suscriptores
-7524 horas
-4827 días
-2 03730 días
Archivo de publicaciones
NFT are (basically) digital collectibles. They are bought and sold generally with crypto coin. It’s a bit more complicated, but that is the general gist of it. If you have too much money and dont know where to spend it, NFT might be up your alley.

I am not involved in the McAfee drop that is coming up. I just saw it and felt it was curious enough to post. I have no idea what it is going to be released. Will be disappointing if it is just an NFT timesale or something dumb like that.

I was invited to speak at some event in Vegas in the third week of October. I have not accepted the invite yet, though I probably will. Waiting to see what the format is before I accept.

There is about an hour until McAfee’s drop is released. No idea if it is a marketing campaign for some product or an actual deadman switch drop. Doesnt hurt to watch though, and he was kind enough to set the countdown to a relatively close date and time so we dont need to get too involved in speculation.

There are many discussions ongoing in the codemonkeyz chat room. Rules: no porn no spam no threats of violence Room is moderated by Pepper. You can join here: https://t.me/codemonkeyzchat

Packets consist of two portions: the header and the payload. The header contains information about the packet, such as its origin and destination IP addresses (an IP address is like a computer's mailing address). The payload is the actual data

I have not seen Mike Lindells PCAPs and don’t know the circumstances and data he has, but this could potentially be HUGE if he is able to verify and properly analyze what happened on the networks on election night.

If election management software sent packets over the internet without at least enabling TLS, then that indicates that they are careless at implementing security at the least, and might even be potentially malicious.

The barrier to entry to use TLS is very low. It takes but a minute to enable on a server or software, and takes seconds as an end-user (https is TLS, http isnt).

Now let’s assume that the sender/receiver of the packets didn’t use TLS. If Mike’s team was able to run the packet capturing mechanism somewhere along the network routes that the election data took, and TLS was not enabled, then we can essentially conclude that He. Has. It. All.

If we assume TLS was enabled, then Mike Lindell would only be able to get intelligible PCAPs if the person logging the packets was either the sender, receiver, or cracked the encryption of the packets. If Mike’s team was able to crack TLS then we will have a major problem for anybody who uses the internet. There are man-in-the-middle techniques which could grab packets thought to be end-to-end encrypted but very few groups are in position to do so. (see: nsa, cloudflare, etc).

If Mike Lindell has PCAPs that prove there was a cyber operation that targeted the election networks, then first we need to think about how he got the PCAPs.

Now let’s think for a second about Mike Lindell’s PCAPs.

Only the recipient and sender of the packet will know what the packet contains if TLS is used.

TLS, or Transfer Layer Security, encrypts your data before sending it over the network. If anybody captures your packets while youre using TLS, then they just see a garbled mess.

Now why isn’t everyone’s online bank account getting hacked every day by people who get the smart idea to run packet capturing software?

Since packets are sent back and forth constantly with any amount of jumps or networks in between, anybody along the route could theoretically capture the packets holding your online banking password and steal your money.

Just having 100 Gorillabytes of packet captures means nothing on its own since packets are being sent constantly back and forth over the internet. The fact that you are able to read this message means you are receiving packets in real time.

Packets are relayed over many nodes and jumps between the origin and the recipient. Any of these relays or networks in between are able to capture packets which pass through.

PCAP is an abbreviation for “Packet Capture”. Data travels over the internet in packets that can be easily intercepted with specifically designed software or hardware.