uz
Feedback

Firibgarlarga uchmang! Telemetrio bunday kanallarni topadi va belgilaydi 👉 Belgini ko‘rmoqchi bo‘lsangiz, obuna bo‘ling

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Ko'proq ko'rsatish

📈 Telegram kanali Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] analitikasi

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 123 199 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Siyosat toifasida 435-o'rinni va AQSH mintaqasida 165-o'rinni egallagan.

📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika

невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 123 199 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.

29 Oktabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni -2 037 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -75 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.

  • Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
  • Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 16.09% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 16.84% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
  • Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 19 837 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 20 761 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
  • Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 409 ta reaksiya keladi.

📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati

Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]”

Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 30 Oktabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Siyosat toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.

Buy Ad
123 199
Obunachilar
-7524 soatlar
-4827 kun
-2 03730 kun
Postlar arxiv
NFT are (basically) digital collectibles. They are bought and sold generally with crypto coin. It’s a bit more complicated, but that is the general gist of it. If you have too much money and dont know where to spend it, NFT might be up your alley.

I am not involved in the McAfee drop that is coming up. I just saw it and felt it was curious enough to post. I have no idea what it is going to be released. Will be disappointing if it is just an NFT timesale or something dumb like that.

I was invited to speak at some event in Vegas in the third week of October. I have not accepted the invite yet, though I probably will. Waiting to see what the format is before I accept.

There is about an hour until McAfee’s drop is released. No idea if it is a marketing campaign for some product or an actual deadman switch drop. Doesnt hurt to watch though, and he was kind enough to set the countdown to a relatively close date and time so we dont need to get too involved in speculation.

There are many discussions ongoing in the codemonkeyz chat room. Rules: no porn no spam no threats of violence Room is moderated by Pepper. You can join here: https://t.me/codemonkeyzchat

Packets consist of two portions: the header and the payload. The header contains information about the packet, such as its origin and destination IP addresses (an IP address is like a computer's mailing address). The payload is the actual data

I have not seen Mike Lindells PCAPs and don’t know the circumstances and data he has, but this could potentially be HUGE if he is able to verify and properly analyze what happened on the networks on election night.

If election management software sent packets over the internet without at least enabling TLS, then that indicates that they are careless at implementing security at the least, and might even be potentially malicious.

The barrier to entry to use TLS is very low. It takes but a minute to enable on a server or software, and takes seconds as an end-user (https is TLS, http isnt).

Now let’s assume that the sender/receiver of the packets didn’t use TLS. If Mike’s team was able to run the packet capturing mechanism somewhere along the network routes that the election data took, and TLS was not enabled, then we can essentially conclude that He. Has. It. All.

If we assume TLS was enabled, then Mike Lindell would only be able to get intelligible PCAPs if the person logging the packets was either the sender, receiver, or cracked the encryption of the packets. If Mike’s team was able to crack TLS then we will have a major problem for anybody who uses the internet. There are man-in-the-middle techniques which could grab packets thought to be end-to-end encrypted but very few groups are in position to do so. (see: nsa, cloudflare, etc).

If Mike Lindell has PCAPs that prove there was a cyber operation that targeted the election networks, then first we need to think about how he got the PCAPs.

Now let’s think for a second about Mike Lindell’s PCAPs.

Only the recipient and sender of the packet will know what the packet contains if TLS is used.

TLS, or Transfer Layer Security, encrypts your data before sending it over the network. If anybody captures your packets while youre using TLS, then they just see a garbled mess.

Now why isn’t everyone’s online bank account getting hacked every day by people who get the smart idea to run packet capturing software?

Since packets are sent back and forth constantly with any amount of jumps or networks in between, anybody along the route could theoretically capture the packets holding your online banking password and steal your money.

Just having 100 Gorillabytes of packet captures means nothing on its own since packets are being sent constantly back and forth over the internet. The fact that you are able to read this message means you are receiving packets in real time.

Packets are relayed over many nodes and jumps between the origin and the recipient. Any of these relays or networks in between are able to capture packets which pass through.

PCAP is an abbreviation for “Packet Capture”. Data travels over the internet in packets that can be easily intercepted with specifically designed software or hardware.