Yesterday's
missile attack on Erbil (March 12th) which is being attributed to Iran marks a significant escalation in the middle east. These were ballistic missiles (not RPGs). Most mainstream reports refer to the proximity of the U.S. consulate, but in fact this building does not seem to have been hit. There are (unverifiable) rumors that the real target was an Israeli intelligence center. If it were true Israel would not acknowledge casualties, but instead retaliate based on some other premise.
It has been noted that this weekend was the birthday of Soleimani (who was assassinated by the Trump administration). Remember that immediately after that assassination Iran raised the red flag over its most important mosque for the first time ever (and kept it up). The red flag means Jihad (holy war) has been declared. Raising the red flag at the Jamkaran mosque specifically sent a second message to the Muslim world. The Jamkaran mosque was dedicated at its founding to the "Final Imam" who comes to wage war in the end times.
Those who know military history will tell you that the Iranians are Persian, not Arab, and their approach to war is far more patient and strategic. It appears that they are taking advantage of the fact that the U.S. is now entangled in eastern Europe to open up a new front. It would be very surprising if we didn't see some kind of major move from Israel in the next few months. This is probably why Israel has tried to convince Zelensky to accept Russia's terms of surrender. They don't want to have to take on Iran and Syria on their own.
The attack on Erbil itself is also strategically significant, because this the capital of the Kurdistan region of Iraq. The U.S. partitioned Iraq down sectarian lines to make it easier to control, but this has always been problematic for Turkey since the U.S. also funds and arms Kurdish militias in Syria. Turkey considers these groups a national security threat that may cross over into its own borders (Turkey has a Kurdish separatist problem of its own). Erdogan would probably never publicly approve of Iran attacking Washington's puppet regime in Kurdistan, but it does in fact align with their interests. If the U.S. were to be completely forced out of Kurdistan Turkey would likely view this as an opportunity to strengthen their own hand and potentially demilitarize Kurdistan. Keep in mind that Erdogan has his own ambitions of a new Ottoman empire.
Now take a step back and look at the big picture. In addition to arming and training neo-Nazi militias in Ukraine (Azov Battalion, Svoboda, Right Sektor etc...),
the U.S. is now moving ISIS linked militants from Syria into Ukraine with promises that they will be allowed to settle there after the war. It doesn't take a crystal ball to see a disaster in the making here. These fighters and weapons aren't going to stay inside of the borders of Ukraine. Two extremists groups that hate each other and who each have supporters in Europe are being given advanced weapons of war and sent to fight Russia, but as Russia pushes them to the edges of Ukraine and
sends in volunteer anti-ISIS fighters from Syria, what do you suppose is going to happen? If history is any guide, these fighters will retreat into a neighboring country. The U.S. may even help smuggle them out as refugees. Consider this in the context of a statement Russia issued on that same day (March 12th)
warning that they viewed the Westās arms convoys for Ukraine as "legitimate targets". Ukraine is just the opening act.
War can be contagious. This particular war especially so because people are interpreting these events through the lens of prophesy. Warriors from every corner of the earth are already making the journey to join the fight for Eurasia. This will be the most important war in human history.
@StormCloudsGathering
Discussion:
@OpenSourceTheNews