en
Feedback
0/0

0/0

Open in Telegram

0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot

Show more

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel 0/0

Channel 0/0 (@error0error) in the Arabic language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 10 920 subscribers, ranking 8 228 in the Religion & Spirituality category and 6 909 in the Saudi Arabia region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 10 920 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 28 August, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 176 over the last 30 days and by 7 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 17.73%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 5.81% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 936 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 634 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
  • Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 29 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Religion & Spirituality category.

Buy Ad
10 920
Subscribers
+724 hours
+427 days
+17630 days
Posts Archive
0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a

0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a
ملخص الأحداث: سيد فرقد صعّد 2 من جماعته سواهم معصومين علاوي الچايچي صار الله المهدي طلع ميت

0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a
+3

0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a

0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a
صارلي يومين اشوف مناظرة فرقد القزويني وية جماعة أحمد الحسن مدري ياهو... كمية الضحك والكفران رهيبة

0/0
10 925
Repost from N/a
يكله المهدي شلون يطلع؟ سيد فرقد:

0/0
10 925
Repost from Out of Season
The 21st century makes romantic moods unaffordable. The fatherland is reduced to a rumor; religion and culture to by-products of the technological horizon. Worse, The family has thinned into a cold contract. Calculation reigns supreme. It's austere and irrefutable. One feels the cold not upon the skin, but in the marrow.

0/0
10 925
.

0/0
10 925
The Cartesian idea of a disembodied mind may well have been the source, by the middle of the twentieth century, for the metaphor of mind as software program. In fact, if mind can be separated from body, perhaps one can try to understand it without any appeal to neurobiology, without any need to be influenced by knowledge of neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry. Interestingly and paradoxically, many cognitive scientists who believe they can investigate the mind without recourse to neurobiology would not consider themselves dualists. — Descartes' Error, by Antonio Damasio

0/0
10 925
The Cartesian idea of a disembodied mind may well have been the source, by the middle of the twentieth century, for the metaphor of mind as software program. In fact, if mind can be separated from body, perhaps one can try to understand it without any appeal to neurobiology, without any need to be influenced by knowledge of neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry. Interestingly and paradoxically, many cognitive scientists who believe they can investigate the mind without recourse to neurobiology would not consider themselves dualists.

0/0
10 925
This is Descartes’ error: the abyssal separation between body and mind, between the sizable, dimensioned, mechanically operated, infinitely divisible body stuff, on the one hand, and the unsizable, undimensioned, un-pushpullable, nondivisible mind stuff; the suggestion that reasoning, and moral judgment, and the suffering that comes from physical pain or emotional upheaval might exist separately from the body. Specifically: the separation of the most refined operations of mind from the structure and operation of a biological organism.

0/0
10 925
What worries me is the acceptance of the importance of feelings without any effort to understand their complex biological and sociocultural machinery. The best example of this attitude can be  found in the attempt to explain bruised feelings or irrational behavior by appealing to surface social causes or the action of neurotransmitters, two explanations that pervade the social discourse as presented in the visual and printed media; and in the attempt to correct personal and social problems with medical and nonmedical drugs. It is precisely this lack of understanding of the nature of feelings and reason (one of the hallmarks of the “culture of complaint”) that is cause for alarm. — Descartes' Error

0/0
10 925
.

0/0
10 925
Voice message05:06

0/0
10 925
In other words, nothing in my formulation urges acceptance of things as they are. I must emphasize this point, since the mention of feelings often conjures up an image of self-oriented concern, of disregard for the world around, and of tolerance for relaxed standards of intellectual performance. That is, in effect, the very opposite of my view, and one less worry for those who, like the molecular biologist Gunther Stent, have been concerned, justly, that the overvaluing of feelings might result in less determination to uphold the Faustian contract that has brought progress to humanity. — Descartes' Error

0/0
10 925
Voice message02:25

0/0
10 925
Knowing about the relevance of feelings in the processes of reason does not suggest that reason is less important than feelings, that it should take a backseat to them or that it should be less cultivated. On the contrary, taking stock of the pervasive role of feelings may give us a chance of enhancing their positive effects and reducing their potential harm. Specifically, without diminishing the orienting value of normal feelings, one would want to protect reason from the weakness that abnormal feelings or the manipulation of normal feelings can introduce in the process of planning and deciding.

0/0
10 925
Voice message03:42

0/0
10 925
Voice message11:32

0/0
10 925
And Descartes' Error