0/0
الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام 0/0
تُعد قناة 0/0 (@error0error) في القطاع اللغوي العربية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 10 920 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 8 228 في فئة الدين والقيم الروحية والمرتبة 6 909 في منطقة المملكة العربية السعودية.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 10 920 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 28 أغسطس, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار 176، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار 7، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 17.73%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 5.81% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 1 936 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 634 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 0.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“0/0 = undefined
A labyrinth of ideas,
A diary of curiosities
Bot: @contactzero_bot”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 29 أغسطس, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة الدين والقيم الروحية.
10 920
المشتركون
+724 ساعات
+427 أيام
+17630 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
10 925
Repost from N/a
ملخص الأحداث:
سيد فرقد صعّد 2 من جماعته سواهم معصومين
علاوي الچايچي صار الله
المهدي طلع ميت
10 925
Repost from N/a
صارلي يومين اشوف مناظرة فرقد القزويني وية جماعة أحمد الحسن مدري ياهو... كمية الضحك والكفران رهيبة
10 925
Repost from Out of Season
The 21st century makes romantic moods unaffordable. The fatherland is reduced to a rumor; religion and culture to by-products of the technological horizon. Worse, The family has thinned into a cold contract. Calculation reigns supreme. It's austere and irrefutable. One feels the cold not upon the skin, but in the marrow.
10 925
The Cartesian idea of a disembodied mind may well have been the source, by the middle of the twentieth century, for the metaphor of mind as software program. In fact, if mind can be separated from body, perhaps one can try to understand it without any appeal to neurobiology, without any need to be influenced by knowledge of neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry. Interestingly and paradoxically, many cognitive scientists who believe they can investigate the mind without recourse to neurobiology would not consider themselves dualists.
— Descartes' Error, by Antonio Damasio
10 925
The Cartesian idea of a disembodied mind may well have been the source, by the middle of the twentieth century, for the metaphor of mind as software program. In fact, if mind can be separated from body, perhaps one can try to understand it without any appeal to neurobiology, without any need to be influenced by knowledge of neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry. Interestingly and paradoxically, many cognitive scientists who believe they can investigate the mind without recourse to neurobiology would not consider themselves dualists.
10 925
This is Descartes’ error: the abyssal separation between body and mind, between the sizable, dimensioned, mechanically operated, infinitely divisible body stuff, on the one hand, and the unsizable, undimensioned, un-pushpullable, nondivisible mind stuff; the suggestion that reasoning, and moral judgment, and the suffering that comes from physical pain or emotional upheaval might exist separately from the body. Specifically: the separation of the most refined operations of mind from the structure and operation of a biological organism.
10 925
What worries me is the acceptance of the importance of feelings without any effort to understand their complex biological and sociocultural machinery. The best example of this attitude can be found in the attempt to explain bruised feelings or irrational behavior by appealing to surface social causes or the action of neurotransmitters, two explanations that pervade the social discourse as presented in the visual and printed media; and in the attempt to correct personal and social problems with medical and nonmedical drugs. It is precisely this lack of understanding of the nature of feelings and reason (one of the hallmarks of the “culture of complaint”) that is cause for alarm.
— Descartes' Error
10 925
In other words, nothing in my formulation urges acceptance of things as they are. I must emphasize this point, since the mention of feelings often conjures up an image of self-oriented concern, of disregard for the world around, and of tolerance for relaxed standards of intellectual performance. That is, in effect, the very opposite of my view, and one less worry for those who, like the molecular biologist Gunther Stent, have been concerned, justly, that the overvaluing of feelings might result in less determination to uphold the Faustian contract that has brought progress to humanity.
— Descartes' Error
10 925
Knowing about the relevance of feelings in the processes of reason does not suggest that reason is less important than feelings, that it should take a backseat to them or that it should be less cultivated. On the contrary, taking stock of the pervasive role of feelings may give us a chance of enhancing their positive effects and reducing their potential harm. Specifically, without diminishing the orienting value of normal feelings, one would want to protect reason from the weakness that abnormal feelings or the manipulation of normal feelings can introduce in the process of planning and deciding.
