0/0

Open in Telegram

0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot

Saudi Arabia7 313 Religion & Spirituality8 820...

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel 0/0

Channel 0/0 (@error0error) in the Arabic language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 10 545 subscribers, ranking 8 820 in the Religion & Spirituality category and 7 313 in the Saudi Arabia region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 10 545 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 24 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 300 over the last 30 days and by 10 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

Verification status: Not verified
Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 17.72%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 5.84% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 869 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 616 views.
Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot”

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 25 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Religion & Spirituality category.

10 545

Subscribers

+1024 hours

+477 days

+30030 days

1 869

Post views

~ 61624 hours

~ 76748 hours

17.72%

Engagement rate

~ 2

Posts per day

Ads index

beta

Posts Archive

10 544

Repost from 0/0

Reading sometimes feels like excavation: I read because I'm looking for my ideas, better articulated.

10 544

I was reading the book when I stumbled upon this particular aphorism... The similarity in describing science as (mechanistic) struck me.

10 544

For a related note, check: The Joyful Science, by Friedrich Nietzsche (aphorism 373: "Science" as prejudice).

10 544

Repost from Intellectus

10 544

— Chad Engelland's introduction to phenomenology

10 544

Try this activity. Stand in the middle of a busy square and stare intently upward at something, a circling bird perhaps. Your gaze will be contagious, as others will spontaneously clue into your attention, which is made available thanks to your bodily behavior: “What is it? What do you see?” People will not have to infer that you are looking up earnestly; they’ll see that. Precisely because experience takes place in the world thanks to our flesh, our experience is not private but is available to those about us.

10 544

This appeal to mind-reading, however, does not quite fit the phenomenological facts. A careful attention to experience reveals that meaning does not lurk hidden behind the body but is instead made manifest in and through the movement of the body. That is, infants learn to speak not thanks to skills of inference but thanks to the natural manifestation of flesh. The meaning is not hidden behind the body; the meaning is embodied in movement toward or away from items of interest. Infants learn speech thanks to “body-reading,” not mind-reading.

10 544

Psychologists point to something called “mind-reading” to explain the prelinguistic bridge from self to other. Infants read the minds of those about them and thereby come to understand the meaning of overheard words: ball, cat, mom, and so on. Psychologists don’t intend any magical faculty, a kind of sixth sense that gives us a conduit to the hidden thoughts of others. Instead, they mean that outward behavior occasions inferences to hidden mental states. The language user might point to an item while saying “ball” and the infant can thus infer that the bodily bearing indicates the item from the world the word means.

10 544

الجَسَد: جِسمُ الإنسانِ ولا يُقالُ لغيرِ الإنسانِ مِن الأجسامِ المغتَذِية كالحَيواناتِ والنّباتات. وقد يُقال للملائكةِ والجنّ جَسَد؛ وكلُّ خَلقٍ لا يأكل ولا يشربُ مِن نحو الملائكة والجنّ ممّا يَعقل، فهو جسد. والروحُ إذا حَلّت في بَدَنِ إنسانٍ فقد تجسّدَت، ولا يقال لها: تجسّمت. الجِسم: جِسمُ الشيءِ حَجمُه، والجِسم هو كلُّ ما لَه طولٌ وعَرضٌ وعُمق. والجِسم في اصطلاحِ الحُكَماء هو الجوهرُ القابلُ للأبعادِ الثلاثة.

10 544

As a gift to its language, the German tongue has two words for the body, Leib and Körper. One names a living, experiencing, and expressive body, and the other an inert physical thing. It is a shortcoming of the English language that we don’t have the same distinction, and we accordingly must call both living and nonliving bodies “bodies.” What comes closest to Leib, the living body, is the English word flesh, a word that is deeply evocative, suggesting something visceral or carnal. — Chad Engelland

10 544

أَنتِ النَعيمُ لِقَلبي وَالعَذابُ لَهُ فَما أَمَرُّكِ فِي قَلبي وَأَحلاكِ عِندِي رَسائِلُ شَوقٍ لَستُ أَذكُرُها لَولا الرَقيبُ لَقَد بَلَّغتُها فاكِ

10 544

اويلي هاي جانت بالأدب مال الخامس لو الرابع... بوكتها جنت داستوعب ليش اسمه "الشريف الرضي" وليش ديوزع "رسائل شوق"

10 544

Repost from وِجْدَان

يا ظَبيَةَ البانِ تَرعىٰ فِي خَمائِلِهِ لِيَهنَكِ اليَومَ أَنَّ القَلبَ مَرعاكِ كَأَنَّ طَرفَكِ يَومَ الجِزعِ يُخبِرُنا بِما طَوىٰ عَنكِ مِن أَسماءِ قَتلاكِ أَنتِ النَعيمُ لِقَلبي وَالعَذابُ لَهُ فَما أَمَرُّكِ فِي قَلبي وَأَحلاكِ عِندِي رَسائِلُ شَوقٍ لَستُ أَذكُرُها لَولا الرَقيبُ لَقَد بَلَّغتُها فاكِ هامَت بِكِ العَينُ لَم تَتبَع سِواكِ هَوًىٰ مَن عَلَّمَ البَينَ أَنَّ القَلبَ يَهواكِ

10 544

People do not resort to alternative medicine because they are stupid or irrational, but because they are desperate and hopeless. No amount of logic & education can convince a drowning man to stop paddling & flailing his limbs vainly even though he knows he can't swim.

10 544

Alternative medicine thrives where modern medicine fails (to meet the patient's expectations). It lives off like a parasite, feasting on the stubborn, false hope of desperate patients.

10 544

My main problem with Hume & Kant's idealism (the idea that we are in a profound estrangement from reality) and their modern editions that are based on neuroscience and psychology, is how these philosophies reach the conclusion that "we can never perceive reality." How do you know real objects even exist if you can't perceive them at all? If this was the case then we wouldn't even have had the concept nor the argument of (reality vs. appearance). These systems of thoughts have a major flaw: in order to divide the world into the world of phenomena (which is perceptible by humans), and the real world (which is inaccessible to humans), one has to assume an extra-human perspective; one has to take off his human eyes and replace them with God-like eyes. These philosophies sound as if they were written from the perspective of an alien, or a god. Because, in the end, what lies beyond the perception of humans, would not concern humans. They wouldn't even know that such things exist.

10 544

The words above were based on the 'Phenomenology' book from 'MIT Essential Knowledge Series'