Не баг, а фича
Оригинальный первоисточник ИТ-лайфхаков и секретов кибербезопасности Администратор: @andrey_admin РКН: clck.ru/3G9aLX
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Не баг, а фича
Channel Не баг, а фича (@bugfeature) in the Russian language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 621 470 subscribers, ranking 118 in the Technologies & Applications category and 355 in the Russia region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 621 470 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 22 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -17 618 over the last 30 days and by -593 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 3.07%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 2.00% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 19 113 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 12 432 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 202.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as будильник, нейросеть, waymo, sim, гении.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Оригинальный первоисточник ИТ-лайфхаков и секретов кибербезопасности
Администратор: @andrey_admin
РКН: clck.ru/3G9aLX”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 23 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
npx --yes codex-startup-pressure-test-skill@latest
А забрать всю базу — тут
@bugfeature | #полезноAnalyze the handwriting in this image in a detailed and nuanced way. Describe observable features such as letter size, spacing, slant, pressure, consistency, and overall structure. Based on these features, infer possible personality traits, habits, and emotional tendencies, clearly distinguishing between objective observations and speculative interpretations.
Avoid making any medical or psychological diagnoses. Instead, frame insights as possibilities (e.g., 'may suggest,' 'could indicate'). Comment on:
Level of organization vs spontaneity
Emotional expressiveness vs restraint
Confidence vs hesitation
Attention to detail vs big-picture thinking
Energy levels or intensity suggested by stroke patterns
Also note any unique or unusual features that stand out and what they might symbolize in a general behavioral sense.
End with a brief, balanced summary that highlights both strengths and potential challenges suggested by the handwriting, while emphasizing that handwriting analysis is interpretive and not scientifically diagnostic.
В считанные секунды нейросеть проанализирует стиль написания, паттерны и выдаст подробный отчет по вашему почерку.
@bugfeature | #полезноRedraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want@bugfeature | #промт
Available now! Telegram Research 2025 — the year's key insights 
