en
Feedback
Neonatal Intensive Care

Neonatal Intensive Care

Open in Telegram

Neonatal Intensive Care Channel @newborn Administrator: @Vafaeeali Technical Supervisor of the Channel: Ali Vafaee, M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care Ph.D. Candidate in Nursing Ms. Aida Safaei Fakhr M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care

Show more

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Neonatal Intensive Care

Channel Neonatal Intensive Care (@newborn) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 17 314 subscribers, ranking 1 357 in the Medicine category and 19 127 in the Iran region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 17 314 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 20 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 142 over the last 30 days and by 4 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 23.05%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 5.96% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 3 992 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 1 032 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 14.
  • Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as است, مراقبت, نوزادان, برای, نوزاد.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
Neonatal Intensive Care Channel @newborn Administrator: @Vafaeeali Technical Supervisor of the Channel: Ali Vafaee, M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care Ph.D. Candidate in Nursing Ms. Aida Safaei Fakhr M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 21 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Medicine category.

17 314
Subscribers
+424 hours
+167 days
+14230 days
Attracting Subscribers
June '26
June '26
+113
in 0 channels
May '26
+229
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+140
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+88
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+128
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+136
in 1 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+153
in 2 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+258
in 4 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+142
in 2 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+146
in 1 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+156
in 4 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+178
in 4 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+139
in 3 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+131
in 5 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+229
in 2 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+281
in 3 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+141
in 1 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+192
in 2 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+246
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+280
in 1 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+340
in 4 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+466
in 3 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+411
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+470
in 2 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+485
in 1 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+603
in 2 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+530
in 2 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+478
in 1 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+502
in 1 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+484
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+446
in 1 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+199
in 4 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+118
in 1 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+118
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+141
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+101
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+113
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+129
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+131
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+158
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+140
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+172
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+139
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+123
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+135
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+151
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+112
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+153
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+127
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+119
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+138
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+125
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+78
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+71
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+80
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+79
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+99
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+76
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+99
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+118
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '21
+110
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+88
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+84
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '21
+106
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '21
+104
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '21
+170
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '20
+8 902
in 0 channels
Date
Subscriber Growth
Mentions
Channels
21 June0
20 June+5
19 June0
18 June0
17 June+2
16 June+9
15 June+4
14 June+5
13 June+8
12 June+4
11 June+3
10 June+5
09 June+11
08 June+6
07 June+5
06 June+5
05 June+6
04 June+8
03 June+3
02 June+13
01 June+11
Channel Posts
June 2026 - Advances in Respiratory Care of the Newborn - #Clinics_in_Perinatology

2
No text...
578
3
March 2026 - Stillbirth - #Clinics_in_Perinatology
513
4
No text...
488
5
December 2025 - Epidemiology and Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease - #Clinics_in_Perinatology
513
6
No text...
531
7
Neonatology for Medical Trainees.pdf
1 226
8
Platelet_transfusion_thresholds_for_thrombocytopenic_infants_Review.pdf
2 619
9
Grand Rounds June 2026.pdf
4 353
10
#NeoReviews - June 2026
3 890
11
No text...
4 740
12
❤️❤️❤️ Dear Members: Please “BOOST” our Telegram channel to increase the quality of the content. https://t.me/boost/newborn https://t.me/boost/newborn https://t.me/boost/newborn
4 187
13
No text...
3 939
14
Evidence-Based Practice Model @newborn @newborn
Evidence-Based Practice Model @newborn @newborn
3 345
15
50 Studies Every Neonatologist Should Know #requested
3 479
16
+1
#requested
3 588
17
Full version 2027
0
18
Full version 2027
0
19
https://t.me/boost/newborn
0
20
*Predicting outcomes in HIE* A secondary analysis of an RCT of 113 asphyxiated infants compared transport using a phase-change material (PCM) mattress vs. standard care. *_Findings_* - 81 infants had aEEG data, 50 had LDH measured on admission - No difference in achieving target temperature - Poor outcomes at 18 months linked to: – LDH >1000 U/L (89% sensitivity, 61% specificity) – Severely depressed aEEG within 12 hours (87% sensitivity, 47% specificity) – Combined LDH + aEEG improved prediction (91% sensitivity, 62% specificity; 81% accuracy) The small sample size, with both LDH and aEEG assessed is 50 infants, limits statistical power and precision. There’s also potential selection bias, since not all enrolled infants had complete data. The combined use of LDH and aEEG is practical, but the modest specificity (62%) suggests these markers are better for ruling out poor outcomes than definitively predicting them, so they should complement—not replace—full assessment. @newborn @newborn https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42059139/
0