Neonatal Intensive Care
Neonatal Intensive Care Channel @newborn Administrator: @Vafaeeali Technical Supervisor of the Channel: Ali Vafaee, M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care Ph.D. Candidate in Nursing Ms. Aida Safaei Fakhr M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 Neonatal Intensive Care 的分析概览
频道 Neonatal Intensive Care (@newborn) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 17 292 名订阅者,在 医学 类别中位列第 1 359,并在 伊朗 地区排名第 19 110 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 17 292 名订阅者。
根据 11 六月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 175,过去 24 小时变化为 2,整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态: 未认证
- 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 18.49%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 6.51% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 3 198 次浏览,首日通常累积 1 126 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 11。
- 主题关注点: 内容集中在 است, مراقبت, نوزادان, برای, نوزاد 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“Neonatal Intensive Care Channel
@newborn
Administrator: @Vafaeeali
Technical Supervisor of the Channel:
Ali Vafaee, M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care
Ph.D. Candidate in Nursing
Ms. Aida Safaei Fakhr M.Sc. in Neonatal Intensive Care”
凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 12 六月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 医学 类别中的关键影响点。
数据加载中...
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 12 六月 | +4 | |||
| 11 六月 | +3 | |||
| 10 六月 | +5 | |||
| 09 六月 | +11 | |||
| 08 六月 | +6 | |||
| 07 六月 | +5 | |||
| 06 六月 | +5 | |||
| 05 六月 | +6 | |||
| 04 六月 | +8 | |||
| 03 六月 | +3 | |||
| 02 六月 | +13 | |||
| 01 六月 | +11 |
| 2 | #NeoReviews - June 2026 | 1 637 |
| 3 | 没有文字... | 2 614 |
| 4 | ❤️❤️❤️ Dear Members:
Please “BOOST” our Telegram channel to increase the quality of the content.
https://t.me/boost/newborn
https://t.me/boost/newborn
https://t.me/boost/newborn | 3 327 |
| 5 | 没有文字... | 3 305 |
| 6 | Evidence-Based Practice Model
@newborn
@newborn | 2 948 |
| 7 | 50 Studies Every Neonatologist Should Know #requested | 3 479 |
| 8 | +1 #requested | 3 588 |
| 9 | Full version 2027 | 0 |
| 10 | Full version 2027 | 0 |
| 11 | https://t.me/boost/newborn | 0 |
| 12 | *Predicting outcomes in HIE*
A secondary analysis of an RCT of 113 asphyxiated infants compared transport using a phase-change material (PCM) mattress vs. standard care.
*_Findings_*
- 81 infants had aEEG data, 50 had LDH measured on admission
- No difference in achieving target temperature
- Poor outcomes at 18 months linked to:
– LDH >1000 U/L (89% sensitivity, 61% specificity)
– Severely depressed aEEG within 12 hours (87% sensitivity, 47% specificity)
– Combined LDH + aEEG improved prediction (91% sensitivity, 62% specificity; 81% accuracy)
The small sample size, with both LDH and aEEG assessed is 50 infants, limits statistical power and precision.
There’s also potential selection bias, since not all enrolled infants had complete data.
The combined use of LDH and aEEG is practical, but the modest specificity (62%) suggests these markers are better for ruling out poor outcomes than definitively predicting them, so they should complement—not replace—full assessment.
@newborn
@newborn
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42059139/ | 0 |
| 13 | #requested Neonatology Questions and Controversies series, Fourth Edition 2024 | 0 |
| 14 | Grand Rounds May 2026 | 0 |
| 15 | #NeoReviews May 2026 | 0 |
| 16 | Basics in neonatal EEG.mp4 | 0 |
| 17 | Peds-1225-Neonatal-Rashes.pdf | 0 |
| 18 | Peds-1225-Neonatal-Rashes.pdf | 0 |
| 19 | Respiratory care of infants born at the limits of viability
A Physiologic and Developmental Appr oach fr om Birth to Hospital Discharge at the University of Iowa
#2026
#10.1016/j.clp.2026.02.001
#Clin_Perinatol
#Article
👉Neonatology
👉neonatology.app
👉Neonatology Platform
👉Neonatal Discussion Group (NDG) | 0 |
| 20 | Neonatology Platform (Beta Version) | 0 |
现已上线!2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
