YieldScope π’
Kanalga Telegramβda oβtish
1 522
Obunachilar
-324 soatlar
-217 kunlar
-9030 kunlar
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Ma'lumot yo'q
Muammo bormi? Iltimos, sahifani yangilang yoki bizning qo'llab-quvvatlash boshqaruvchimizga murojaat qiling>.
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Avgust '26
Avgust '260
0 kanalda
Iyul '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+21
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+8
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+15
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+21
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+19
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+419
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+1 120
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+1 631
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+3 566
5 kanalda
Get PRO
May '240
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '240
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+14
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+104
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+10 144
2 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 03 Avgust | 0 | |||
| 02 Avgust | 0 | |||
| 01 Avgust | 0 |
Kanal postlari
A crypto card advertises "up to 4% back."
In footnote 4 on the same page: "Reward value available for 3 months after activating."
The footnote marks both tiers, not just the top one. The card fee renews every year. The rewards do not.
We read the fine print on three cards today. Uphold, Coinbase, Crypto com β all three headline rates have a condition underneath that nobody puts in the headline.
The honest numbers, once you strip the conditions:
π’ Uphold β 2% on the free tier, capped at $120/month. Note the same footnote marks this tier too, so it is on the same three-month clock.
π’ Coinbase One Card β 2% entry tier, and it needs a paid Coinbase One membership from $49.99/yr before any of it applies
π’ Crypto com β 1.5% on the free tier. The 6% needs $500,000 of CRO locked for a year.
None of this is hidden. It is just printed underneath the number people actually read.
All 19 crypto cards, with what each headline leaves out π yieldscope.io/en/cards/crypto/
| 2 |  +1The highest dollar stablecoin rate on our board today is 17%.
It is at a venue that passes zero of our five safety checks.
Here is the whole board, and what each number costs you.
π΅ Stablecoins, highest first:
π΄ 17.0% β USDT on CoinDepo β grade F
π΄ 12.0% β USDT on YouHodler β grade F
π΄ 8.50% β USDT on Ledn β grade F
π’ 8.67% β FRAX on Gate β grade B
π’ 5.50% β USDT on Kraken β grade B
Read those last two lines again. The best rate from a venue that passes 4 of our 5 checks is 8.67% β higher than Ledn's 8.5%. You are not being paid extra for the risk. You are just taking it.
π Highest of any coin:
365% β ZIL on Bitget
211% β CFX on CoinEx
202% β ZIL on OKX
100% β MMT on Bitget
Before you reach for the 365%: that pool accepts $55,000 in total, across everyone. The MMT pool at 100% accepts $8,800. These are marketing budgets with a queue, not products.
π And what moved overnight, out of 1,400 pairs we can compare to yesterday:
π MMT β 6.3% β 100% (Bitget)
π JST β 78% β 130% (Bitget)
π ENJ β 30% β 1% (Bitget)
π AXL β 18% β 0.7% (Bybit)
𧨠My favourite detail today: KAITO went UP on OKX, 81% β 107%, and DOWN on Bitget, 18% β 8.8%. Same coin, same day, opposite directions. Whatever these numbers are tracking, it isn't the coin.
Every rate above is a base rate β no promo tiers, no teaser slices.
Full board, updated daily: yieldscope.io | 12 |
| 3 |  On 14 July, Bitget paid 7.5% a year on USDE, a dollar stablecoin.
Today it pays 1%.
If you had $10,000 sitting there, you were on track for $750 a year. You're now on track for $100. You did nothing wrong, you moved no money, and nobody emailed you. The rate just slid down for ten days and has sat at 1% since the 24th.
That's the part people miss when they compare crypto rates. The number you see is today's number. It is not a promise, and there's no notice period.
We keep a daily snapshot of every rate, so we can say how normal this is. Across 1,174 products with withdraw-anytime terms, over the last three weeks:
π Nearly half β 43% β either doubled or halved
πͺ 111 more didn't get cut, they got deleted. The product closed.
Some venues do it constantly, some barely at all. Share of their rates that doubled or halved in three weeks:
π’ CoinDepo 0%
π’ KuCoin 3%
π‘ OKX 34%
π‘ Bitget 38%
π΄ Binance Earn 63%
π΄ Gate 70%
And here's the twist that stops this being a shopping list. π§¨
CoinDepo has the steadiest rates on the board β and scores F on safety, failing all five of our checks. KuCoin is second steadiest and scores D. Gate is the wildest and scores B.
A rate that never moves isn't automatically a safe rate. Sometimes it just means nobody is repricing your risk.
So before you park money anywhere: what does it pay, how safe is the venue, and how often does it change its mind?
Every rate, every grade, updated daily: yieldscope.io | 13 |
| 4 |  99.99% APY.
On your first $100.
That's Bitget's advertised rate on PAXG, their tokenised gold product. The number is real β it just applies to your first 0.025 PAXG. Everything above that earns 2%.
It's not one weird outlier. Same pattern everywhere:
π₯ Binance USD1 β 8.53% on the first $1,500, then 0.53%
π΅ Binance USDT β 4.54% on the first $200, then 1.54%
βΏ Bitget BTC β 1.88% on the first 0.003 BTC (~$190), then 0.12%
Meanwhile the median base rate on USDT across the 15 venues we track is 1.94%. On USDC, 2.00%.
So after the first couple of hundred dollars, crypto's famous yields pay roughly what a dull savings account pays. π₯±
The exchanges aren't hiding it β the caps are in the terms. The problem is that almost every "best crypto yield" list republishes the promo tier as if it were the rate, because a bigger number makes a better page.
We publish the base rate. Always. Even when it's boring.
Every venue, every base rate: yieldscope.io | 17 |
| 5 |  π We sorted every stablecoin rate on our board by the safety grade of the venue paying it. 37 venues, five checks each.
We expected a curve. We got a flat line and a cliff.
π’ Grade A
1.00% median
π‘ Grade B
1.75% median
π Grade C
1.61% median
π΄ Grade D
3.50% median
β Grade F
14.50% median
π Look at the middle four. A venue failing two of five checks pays 1.61%. One passing all five pays 1.00%. You give up regulation and proof of reserves β and collect 0.61 points for it.
π§ Same shape on BTC and ETH: 0.72% at A, 1.64% at D, 12.00% at F.
β The entire premium is bolted onto the grade that fails almost every check. That's not compensation for risk. That's the market telling you where deposits stop coming back.
β
So there's no sensible middle. Either take 1-2% somewhere that passes its checks, or go to F knowing exactly what the extra 12 points are made of.
π yieldscope.io/l/tg/risk-cliff | 18 |
| 6 |  There are exactly ten double-digit stablecoin rates on our board today π΅
Eight of them sit on venues that fail most of our five safety checks. The two that don't, lock your money.
π΄ Lune.fi USDT β 29.50%, grade F, locked 360 days
π΄ CoinDepo USDT β 17.00%, grade F, available
π Nebeus USDC β 12.00%, grade D, locked 120 days
π’ WhiteBIT USDT β 11.76%, grade B, locked 30 days
π΄ YouHodler USDT β 11.00%, grade F, available
π’ WhiteBIT USDC β 10.92%, grade B, locked 30 days
So the trade is always the same: you pay for double digits either with the venue's safety or with access to your own money. "Double digits, on a venue passing 4 of 5 checks, withdrawable today" is not on the menu.
The best flexible rate on a venue that does pass four: Kraken, 5.50%.
π yieldscope.io/l/tg/double-digit | 16 |
| 7 |  π Bitget advertises 10% APY on PEPE.
That rate applies to the first $15 of your deposit. Not $15,000. Fifteen dollars.
We pulled the tier tables straight from the exchange APIs today. Here is the headline rate, and what $1,000 actually earns:
π PEPE Β· Bitget
advertised 10.00% β applies to the first $15
your $1,000 earns 0.40%
π PAXG Β· Bitget
advertised 99.99% β applies to the first $101
your $1,000 earns 11.93%
π BTC Β· Bitget
advertised 1.88% β applies to the first $194
your $1,000 earns 0.46%
π XAUT Β· Bitget
advertised 15.00% β applies to the first $405
your $1,000 earns 6.79%
π USDC Β· Bitget
advertised 6.66% β applies to the first $300
your $1,000 earns 3.29%
π USDT Β· Binance
advertised 4.55% β applies to the first $200
your $1,000 earns 2.15%
π None of this is hidden. Every venue publishes its tier table. It just never survives the trip to the number you see on a comparison site.
β
So we did the boring thing: we publish the venue's own base rate, never the teaser, print the ladder underneath it, and let you type in your amount to see what it really pays.
π yieldscope.io/l/tg/teaser-tiers | 22 |
| 8 |  π Found a fun one while cross-checking our rate data against another aggregator's feed.
One exchange's savings rates were inflated exactly 3.65x β across every single one of 112 coins we compared.
π Their number for USDT savings: 9.12%
β
The actual rate on the exchange: 2.5%
Classic bug: someone annualized a daily rate and forgot to divide by 100. It's been live for who knows how long, quietly feeding comparison sites and screenshots people trade on.
Nobody noticed β because yield data mostly gets copied, not verified.
That's why we hand-check platform pages daily, every rate graded A-F: https://yieldscope.io/en/
Not financial advice. | 23 |
| 9 |  The best crypto yield I found in 60 days of tracking isn't 499% APY.
It's 5.5% π’
Since May 25 I've logged 44,296 rates across 37 platforms. Here's what the data says:
π 126 rates spiked above 60% APY
β οΈ 2 out of 3 were dead within 24 hours
πͺ¦ The record β 499% β lived exactly ONE day
π Yesterday's fresh 365% on $ZIL? It's 13% this morning
Meanwhile, on the boring side:
π΄ A THIRD of all rates (458!) never moved at all
π’ USDT at 5.5% on Kraken β 30 straight days without a change. Just quietly paying, every day.
Flashy number = bait π£
Boring number = pay π°
What's the longest you've ever seen a 100%+ APY survive? My record: 12 days π | 31 |
| 10 |  One exchange printed THREE fresh 365% APYs this morning π¨οΈ
π $ZIL β was 1.0% yesterday, 365% today
π RIF β was 1.29% yesterday, 365% today
π RE β our all-time record holder (499% in June), back on the line
Before you ape in, ask the previous batch how it went:
πͺ¦ GWEI β held 365% for 12 straight days, cut to 160% today
πͺ¦ T β ran 365% since Jul 19, quietly delisted this morning
πͺ¦ BONK β 101% yesterday, 44% today
Same printer, same script, new tickers. Meanwhile the boring shelf hasn't moved: USDS 7.08% (WhiteBit, B), USDT 5.5% (Kraken, B β day 29), SOL 6% (Gemini, B) π’ | 28 |
| 11 |  Nobody announces a base-rate cut. We caught five this week π
β¬οΈ Ledn: USDT & USDC 6.5% β 5.0% (new tier for deposits under $100K)
β¬οΈ Uphold: SOL staking 6.05% β 4.95%
β¬οΈ Kraken: ETH 2.37% β 2.31%, SOL 5.95% β 5.92%
β¬οΈ Coinbase: ETH & SOL trimmed too
Meanwhile the promo printer is doing its thing π¨οΈ T at 365%, POLYX born today at 354%, and GWEI finally melting (330%) after 12 straight days at 365%.
Worst hit this week: $SOL β two platforms cut it in the same seven days.
The signal isn't the fireworks β it's the quiet column. Base yield is repricing down. The graded survivors are still up: USDS 7.08% (WhiteBit, B), USDT 5.5% (Kraken, B, day 28).
Not financial advice.
#Stablecoins | 27 |
| 12 |  πΊοΈ Weekly rate map β what changed across 34 platforms, July 13β20, and where the sane money parks now.
π’ Where to park (A/B-graded only):
π’ USDS on WhiteBit (B) β 7.08%, unchanged 3+ weeks
π’ USDT on Kraken (B) β 5.5%, day 27 without a change
π’ USDS on Bitget (A) β 5.0%
π’ SOL staking on Kraken (B) β 5.95%
π’ ETH staking on Gemini (B) β 3.0%
β¬οΈ Moved up this week:
π Bybit quietly raised USDT and USDC: 3.75% β 4.0% β the most meaningful hike of the week from a big exchange (grade C, mind you)
π Bitfinex USDT: 9.14% β 9.49% β juicy, but grade D; that premium is the risk premium
π ZK on Gate 4.8% β 18.1% and QTUM on OKX 12.1% β 34.6% β fresh spikes; our tracking says these rarely survive their first days
β¬οΈ Moved down this week:
π Kraken trimmed ETH staking: 2.37% β 2.31%
π RPL on Binance: 19.9% β 6.9%
π BLUR on Bitget: 29.4% β 4.3% and LAB on Gate: 24.8% β 5.5% β last week's promos, fully deflated
βΏ BTC: still max ~1.4% on any A/B platform. BTC yield remains structurally tiny β anyone offering you much more is charging you risk for it.
π Every rate live, graded AβF: https://yieldscope.io/en/stablecoins/
π Full weekly data report: https://yieldscope.io/en/learn/rate-report-2026-07-19/ | 31 |
| 13 |  π Yesterday we told you most fresh 60%+ APYs die within a day. Here's the 24-hour scoreboard from our own tracking:
β οΈ GAS on Bitget: 206% β 9%
β οΈ DATA on Bitget: 81% β 25% β that's 275% β 25% in just two days
β οΈ AERO on Bitget: flat at 22%, down from 100% on Jul 17
π‘ BONK on OKX: 59% β 71% β the only survivor, still at half its peak
π¨οΈ And here's the part that makes it a system, not an accident: while those four were dying, the same exchange printed a brand-new batch this morning β NEO 365%, T 365%, QTUM 61%. Same playbook, new tickers.
π’ Meanwhile USDT on Kraken (grade B) paid 5.5% for the 26th day in a row. It will never trend. It just pays.
π‘ The takeaway: a huge APY isn't income, it's a countdown. If your plan depends on a rate staying alive longer than a day β that's not a plan.
π Every rate, tracked daily and graded AβF: https://yieldscope.io/en/stablecoins/
π How we grade platforms: https://yieldscope.io/en/transparency/ | 29 |
| 14 |  β³ High yield has a shelf life β and it's measured in hours. Here's what 24 hours did to real flexible-earn rates (Jul 17 β Jul 18, our tracking):
π» DATA on Bitget: 275% β 81%
π» BONK on OKX: 128% β 59%
π» AERO on Bitget: 100% β 22%
π GAS on Bitget: 1% β 206% β a brand-new rocket, and the clock is already ticking
π The pattern from our daily data: ~7 in 10 fresh 60%+ APYs don't survive their first day. These rates are marketing budgets and short-lived subsidies, not income you can plan around. If you see the screenshot, you're probably already late.
π’ The other side of the same 24 hours: USDT on Kraken (grade B) β 5.5% β 5.5%, unchanged for 25 straight days. Nobody screenshots it. It just pays.
π Every rate, tracked daily and graded AβF: https://yieldscope.io/en/stablecoins/
π¦ Kraken's full risk breakdown: https://yieldscope.io/en/platform/kraken/
Not financial advice. | 29 |
| 15 |  π A war just shook the markets β here's the week in numbers, and what it means if you earn on crypto.
What happened:
π» The USβIran war reignited β strikes, a blockade of Iran's ports, oil spiking
π» Korea's KOSPI fell 9.95% on Jul 13 (trading fully halted), β6.37% on the 16th
π The Bank of Korea hiked rates to 2.75% β first hike in 3.5 years
π₯ ~$286M in forced liquidations on Upbit in a single day
And over the same week, the crypto a saver actually holds:
π’ Bitcoin: β0.2%
π’ Ethereum: +4.8%
π’ Safe stablecoin rates (grade A/B): 5β5.5%, paying like nothing happened
π‘ The lesson is old: when stocks halted, money didn't flee crypto β it rushed in (Upbit volume ~+1,400%). The $286M that got wiped out were leveraged bets. Plain savings can't be liquidated. In a storm, the grade matters more than the APY. π’
π Full breakdown with every source: https://yieldscope.io/en/learn/markets-shaking-crypto-yield/
π Every safe stablecoin rate, graded: https://yieldscope.io/en/stablecoins/ | 32 |
| 16 |  π¨ Pattern watch: HOME is back at 365% β and last time this pattern showed up, it ended with a β40% day.
πΌ The first time, June 7:
πΈ Bybit raised HOME's earn rate to 236β292%
πΈ Next day: 750M token unlock (~20% of supply)
πΈ Price: β40% overnight
πΌ The rerun, today:
πΈ Bitget: 30% β 168% β 365% in 48h
πΈ Bybit: 5% β 45% the same day
πΈ HOME price since June: β73%
π¬ We don't know what the exchanges know. We even checked the public unlock calendars β no major HOME unlock is listed for this week, which makes the double rate-spike stranger, not safer. In our 51-day archive, extreme rates cluster right before painful token events β unlocks, insider exits, delistings. A 300%+ rate preceded a >10% price drop in 42% of cases.
π‘ When a rate looks like a gift, ask who's paying for it.
βοΈEvery rate, graded AβF, updated daily: https://yieldscope.io/ | 31 |
| 17 |  +1π’ What does a 365% APY actually look like? Same coins, same exchange, six days of daily snapshots:
πΈ DATA: 28 β 365 β 8 β 131 β 2 β 365%
πΈ ALLO: 1 β 1 β 64 β 365 β 73 β 199%
πΈ ICNT: 131 β 58 β 28 β 72 β 277 β 64%
πΈ LAB: 365 Γ four days β 8 β 129% (price did β74% meanwhile π)
π¬ And the cleanest case study of the week β GWEI on Bitget: a flat 365% for SEVEN days straight, we verified it against Bitget's live API today. Same week, GWEI's price: $0.0865 β $0.0469, that's β46%. Interest earned: +6%. Net if you bought in for the rate: β β40%.
π€ Why would an exchange pay 365% and not go broke?
π§’ The pool is capped β the banner rate covers the first few hundred dollars, the rest earns the base ~1%
π©³ Shorts pay high fees to borrow falling tokens β your earn deposit is what they borrow; the exchange shares a slice with you
πͺ€ The 365% banner itself is marketing β it prints sign-ups, and it's paid in a token that's melting anyway
π We ran 51 days of our own archive: when a rate shows 300%+, the coin's price falls >10% the next day in 42% of cases. For calm 30β60% rates it's 3%.
π‘ At the extreme end the rate isn't yield β it's compensation. The boring 5% on USDT quietly beat every coin on this card.
π Full board, every rate graded AβF: https://yieldscope.io/en/ | 32 |
| 18 |  +1π The carousel keeps spinning: DATA just hit 365% APY for the THIRD time in five days.
Spike β collapse β refill β repeat. The reward pool got topped up overnight β again.
And last night's timers hit zero on schedule:
π MINA β 50% β 1% overnight (Bitget, A)
π JST β 63% β 34% (Bitget, A)
The boring anchor π’ USDT at 5.5% on Kraken (B) hasn't moved in six days.
Every rate, graded AβF for safety π https://yieldscope.io
Not financial advice. | 33 |
| 19 |  +1π§ The dead rates came back.
DATA collapsed to 11.7% on Saturday. This morning it's at 365% again. BLUR β same story, third run this week. Same coins, same venue, same bait.
Meanwhile yesterday's climbers did what timers do:
π ALLO β 64% β 1% overnight (Bitget, A-rated venue)
π LPT β 73% β 10% (Bitget, A)
π ENJ β 30% β 1% (Bitget, A)
That's four days and four collapses we called in advance.
A rate that dies and resurrects on a schedule is a marketing dial, not yield. The AβF grade (A safest, F avoid) tells you the venue won't lose your coins β it says nothing about the rate surviving the night.
The boring anchor π’ USDT at 5.5% on Kraken (B-rated): five days, same number.
Not financial advice. Higher rate β higher risk. | 36 |
| 20 | πToday:
π ICNT β 131% β 34% (Bitget, A-rated venue)
π BARD β 69% β 46% (OKX, B-rated)
π ONT β 57% β 34% (OKX, B-rated)
And the board already set new ones:
π DATA β 28% β 297% overnight (Bitget, A)
π IOTA β third day climbing: 23% β 75% β 121% (OKX, π
π BLUR β died on Bybit at 2.7%, reborn at 29% on Bitget
Quick decoder: AβF is a safety report card for the venue β A is safest, F means avoid. The grade tells you the platform passed our checks. It says nothing about the rate surviving the week.
Meanwhile the boring anchor π’ USDT at 5.5% on Kraken (B-rated) β same number three days straight.
Not financial advice. Higher rate β higher risk.
#CryptoHistory | 46 |
