Endi mavjud! Telegram Tadqiqoti 2025 — yilning asosiy insaytlari 
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar Donations: robinmonotti.substack.com/ www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar Group is @robinmggroup We don't DM from this channel account. Rule: Be polite & respectful.
Ko'proq ko'rsatish📈 Telegram kanali Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar analitikasi
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar (@robinmg) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 70 212 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Siyosat toifasida 851-o'rinni va Birlashgan Qirollik mintaqasida 122-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 70 212 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
02 Iyul, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni -791 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -26 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 6.40% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 4.14% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 4 495 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 2 910 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 84 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent iran, jews, antisemitism, attack, gaza kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Rule: Be polite & respectful.”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 03 Iyul, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Siyosat toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
70 212
Obunachilar
-2624 soatlar
-1777 kunlar
-79130 kunlar
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Iyul '26
Iyul '26
+8
6 kanalda
Iyun '26
+231
76 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+285
103 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+778
135 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+1 583
126 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+398
127 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+352
123 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+265
122 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+217
154 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+216
130 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+318
169 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+305
141 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+86
134 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+119
173 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+167
160 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+86
195 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+72
208 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+132
186 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+182
247 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+897
252 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+32
233 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+26
256 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+123
255 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+75
311 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+8
274 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+22
226 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+147
219 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+174
259 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+180
210 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+320
262 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+62
241 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+150
267 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+67
316 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+164
239 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+159
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '23
+143
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '23
+355
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '23
+149
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '23
+589
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '23
+400
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '23
+402
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '23
+371
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '23
+691
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '22
+275
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '22
+432
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '22
+808
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '22
+2 317
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '22
+4 302
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '22
+5 273
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '22
+4 099
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '22
+2 341
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '22
+3 220
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '22
+3 034
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '22
+3 743
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '22
+8 600
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '21
+8 739
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '21
+13 953
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '21
+9 762
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '21
+13 120
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '21
+8 972
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '21
+6 631
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '21
+13 874
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '21
+2 685
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '21
+1 696
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '21
+2 039
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '21
+746
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '21
+1 613
0 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 03 Iyul | +1 | |||
| 02 Iyul | +4 | |||
| 01 Iyul | +3 |
Kanal postlari
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 2/2
There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, we’ve done away with morality and I don’t think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue that’s not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but it’s all there in a subliminal sense. It’s all already there. It’s all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether."
Robin Monotti
Read the full article here:
https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from
2/2
📱 ROBINMG
| 2 |  HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
"Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what it’s coming from: climate fearmongering. We know it’s coming from there, but we also know that there’s more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:
“I am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is what’s happening.”
And we’d all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If you’ve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didn’t get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Who’s profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasn’t always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. That’s the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: it’s what needs to be said. It’s what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.
So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasn’t from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and we’re seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because there’s less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that it’s time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.
One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?
It’s morality.
You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?
1/2 | 1 177 |
| 3 |  +1Croatia's disallowed goal highlights scientism's core ideology that "data" is truth: but it is simply not. It is obvious to the naked eye that the ball direction is not altered by the player's head. That is truth. The blip on the sensor could simply be put there later, it could correspond to an earlier or later touch. If it is isolated from the other previous or subsequent touches it could simply be an added graphic. Data is how to fool people that lies are truth, because it is the easiest thing to manipulate. Trust your own judgment always: you don't see a touch? There is no touch. | 1 661 |
| 4 |  MY CLIMATE CRISIS REPORT
As a climate correspondent I am risking my life from the European centre of the climate crisis to report the truth on the end times approaching. Here are the latest updates from the extreme heat. The end is near. We are all guilty. Repent! | 2 942 |
| 5 | The "Hockey Stick" graph of climate change is a hoax. It was falsified to erase the warm periods. This one derived from Vinos is the actual one.
From Climate Change First Aid Kit
By
John Shewchuk | 3 296 |
| 6 |  STANFORD UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR:
MOST OF SCIENCE IS JUNK SCIENCE!
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" John P. A. Ioannidis
"There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false... Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias."
John P. Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, Professor (by courtesy) of Statistics and Professor (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science. | 3 719 |
| 7 |  CONGO: Where 60% of the world's cobalt for lithium-ion batteries that power smartphones, laptops and electric cars comes from. | 3 265 |
| 8 | What is TCI?
'TCI is the “Thermosphere Climate Index”, a number NASA publishes every day to keep track of the temperature at the top of Earth’s atmosphere–a layer of gas researchers call “the thermosphere.”
https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2022/03/23/what-is-tci/ | 2 914 |
| 9 |  "An historical record of the Thermosphere Climate Index. Mlynczak and colleagues recently published a paper on the TCI showing that the state of the thermosphere can be discussed using a set of five plain language terms: Cold, Cool, Neutral, Warm, and Hot." | 3 245 |
| 10 |  NASA CONFIRMS THE SUN IS THE DRIVER OF TEMPERATURE ON EARTH
“The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum–and it warms up again during Solar Maximum,” explains Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle affects our planet.”
Mlynczak and colleagues recently introduced the “Thermosphere Climate Index” (TCI)–a number expressed in Watts that tells how much heat nitrogen oxide (NO) molecules in the thermosphere are dumping into space. During Solar Maximum, TCI is high (“Hot”); during Solar Minimum, it is low (“Cold”). | 3 301 |
| 11 |  ❗️British anti-terrorism police detain prominent US human rights attorney Dan Kovalik
British anti-terrorism police at Liverpool John Lennon Airport have detained US human rights attorney and international lawyer Dan Kovalik, sparking fresh condemnation over the UK’s expanding use of draconian border powers against prominent dissidents, independent journalists, and legal professionals.
Kovalik, whose high-profile legal repertoire includes representing Colombian President Gustavo Petro, was subjected to intense interrogation under the country's sweeping counter-terrorism legislation.
In a statement on X (formerly Twitter) Kovalik wrote:
"In the height of irony, I was detained at John Lennon International AirPort in Liverpool, England by anti-terrorism police concerned about my opposition to the Genocide on Gaza and the war on Iran."
According to statements released by Kovalik and independent monitoring groups, British authorities seized all of his electronic devices, including phones and laptops, and forced the submission of his biometric data—including fingerprints and DNA samples—under strict legal duress.
Critics argue the operational overreach highlights a coordinated campaign by British political police to weaponize state security apparatuses to intimidate figures challenging western foreign policy narratives.
The weaponization of Schedule 7 of the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 has increasingly drawn fire from international legal bodies, who warn that London is effectively operating a "bureaucratic dragnet" to suppress multi-polar advocacy and legal defense for Global South leaders.
Kovalik’s detention mirrors a broader, systemic pattern of state-backed harassment at UK entry points, which human rights advocates state is designed to criminalize anti-imperialist dissent and compromise confidential legal data under the guise of national security. | 3 241 |
| 12 |  NATO is the military wing of the World Economic Forum. It is the enemy army. Today the enemy are the globalists who run the WEF, it is not any single nation state. Do you agree? | 3 556 |
| 13 | NATO: MILITARY WING OF THE NWO
"With Nazis well integrated into NATO and the CIA becoming an extension of Gehlen’s old Nazi intelligence agency, the Nieue World Ordnung was essentially relocated from the Reichstag in Berlin and dropped into the Pentagon and CIA Langley, Virginia"
https://www.voltairenet.org/article174656.html | 3 887 |
| 14 |  "NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990 -
Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow.
Date
Feb 9, 1990
"The most famous U.S. assurance to the Soviets on NATO expansion confirms the Soviet transcript of the same conversation. Repeating what Bush said at the Malta summit in December 1989, Baker tells Gorbachev: “The President and I have made clear that we seek no unilateral advantage in this process” of inevitable German unification. Baker goes on to say, “We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East. If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is a part of NATO, there would be no extension of NATO’s jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east.” Later in the conversation, Baker poses the same position as a question, “would you prefer a united Germany outside of NATO that is independent and has no US forces or would you prefer a united Germany with ties to NATO and assurances that there would be no extension of NATO’s current jurisdiction eastward?” The declassifiers of this memcon actually redacted Gorbachev’s response that indeed such an expansion would be “unacceptable” – but Baker’s letter to Kohl the next day, published in 1998 by the Germans, gives the quote."
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16116-document-05-memorandum-conversation-between
ROBINMG 🚀 | 3 482 |
| 15 |  WHY NATURAL GAS IS THE CLEANEST ENERGY SOURCE:
Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe. CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink.
The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land.
CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour.
It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water. It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover.
A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere.
Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation.
I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you.
Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions. | 4 805 |
| 16 |  The narrative being prepared in the Financial corporate press is that the coming crash will be caused by defaults on loans taken on to build the Data Centres once it becomes clear AI is not the El Dorado it was sold as. This is what the "Great Reset" will be blamed on. | 3 967 |
| 17 |  The whole CO2 hoax was born out of Al Gore misunderstanding that CO2 rises follow global warming: they do not precede it. This is because the Oceans are the largest store of CO2 & release it as they warm up. Same with carbonated (fizzy) water: try it. | 4 119 |
| 18 | If it is certainly true that gender roles are socially constructed, it is also true that social construction should not be presented as a homogeneous feature that only serves to diminish, obstruct, and oppress. The alleged neutrality of Liberal Feminism is nothing but a lie, as it ignores this reality, only to shape a new world where corporations can maximise the consumers of their product: one good for all."
https://www.savageminds.co/p/feminism-intercepted
📱 ROBINMG | 4 023 |
| 19 | Feminism intercepted
How the Bourgeoisie Seized Women’s Struggle
LAURA CESARETTI
Excerpts:
"Liberal feminism belongs to the particular and individualistic kind of society in which we are living nowadays, the sort of vision pushed in the mid-twentieth century by the likes of Ayn Rand, who considered being selfish and self-reliant a rock that cannot be broken, all couched within a philosophical system of rational self-interest which she called Objectivism. Rand’s theories were themselves a product of the US post-Second World War economic boom. Documentary filmmaker Yasha Levine of the Nefarious Russians describes this ethos as a psyop fostered by Americans through films, books, and art. Consequentially, Rand’s notions of rational self-interest had a boom in the Reagan and Thatcher years and have expanded across American culture to include its “colonies” of which Italy is just one of many.
Media propaganda rejected full-time motherhood just as it labelled breastfeeding as a sign of backwardness and pushed women to work. Consumerism of any kind has become the symbol of breaking from a past of poverty and advancing towards a modern future of ostensible liberation. The idea of humans as individuals, not communities, began to surface, along with the idea of self-realisation and the right to pursue personal freedom ahead of anything else. It is there that liberal feminism rose, becoming mainstream amid America’s suburban culture and ultimately reaching Italy shortly there after.
Rather than a struggle against the oppression of patriarchy, feminism focused on the isolation of the modern nuclear family, which American feminist Betty Friedan famously defined as a “comfortable concentration camp” that oppressed women. Coincidentally, such feminist musings emanated mainly from the new bourgeoisie. What was unbearable, then, was not the overwhelming amount of housework and childcare; instead, it was the boredom and loneliness that occurred in women’s spare time, which they learnt to cure with alcohol, sexual adventures, or an obsessive interest in their children.
From this milieu comes the idea that women’s empowerment means entering the business world exactly like men. These feminists believed that entering the masculine world of competitive achievement would cure the “problem that has no name,” intercepting the struggle of working-class women together with those who come from a different cultural environment or those who struggle with racial violence. While Western feminists argue about the right to be or not to be a mother, the global women’s health movement emerging in Latin America, Africa and Asia, has pointed out that due to centuries of slavery and colonialism, for non-white women, reproductive injustice has also involved the forced denial of motherhood. Under slavery, black women were forced to nurse the children of white mothers instead of their own for instance.
At the time, there were only a few critical voices, such as that of Pier Paolo Pasolini who warned that the quest for emancipation is leading Italians from a nuclear family to a family of consumers. From the moment women rightfully progress toward emancipation, the whole society regresses because it is consumeristic society that takes up her educational role. Pasolini, like Rafanelli, addresses the bourgeoisie as the class that shapes modern society. As holders of power, the elite class has no interest in educating a child; instead, their aim has only been to educate the children in societal adaptions where children are future labourers and consumers. In this way, liberation and emancipation are concepts that depend entirely upon the transformation of the individual to consumer, with the imperative that the individual must maintain and reinforce the status quo. | 3 704 |
| 20 |  How the Rockefeller brothers have controlled globalist narratives in the 20th century and beyond | 4 687 |
