ch
Feedback
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar

Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar

前往频道在 Telegram

Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar Donations: robinmonotti.substack.com/ www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar Group is @robinmggroup We don't DM from this channel account. Rule: Be polite & respectful.

显示更多

📈 Telegram 频道 Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar 的分析概览

频道 Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar (@robinmg) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 70 192 名订阅者,在 政治 类别中位列第 850,并在 英国 地区排名第 122

📊 受众指标与增长动态

невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 70 192 名订阅者。

根据 03 七月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -760,过去 24 小时变化为 -10,整体触达仍然可观。

  • 认证状态: 未认证
  • 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 6.72%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 4.07% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
  • 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 4 715 次浏览,首日通常累积 2 860 次浏览。
  • 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 88
  • 主题关注点: 内容集中在 iran, jews, antisemitism, attack, gaza 等核心主题上。

📝 描述与内容策略

作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar Donations: robinmonotti.substack.com/ www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar Group is @robinmggroup We don't DM from this channel account. Rule: Be polite & respectful.

凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 04 七月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 政治 类别中的关键影响点。

70 192
订阅者
-1024 小时
-1627
-76030
吸引订阅者
七月 '26
七月 '26
+16
在6个频道中
六月 '26
+231
在76个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+285
在103个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+778
在135个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+1 583
在126个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+398
在127个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+352
在123个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+265
在122个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+217
在154个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+216
在130个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+318
在169个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+305
在141个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+86
在134个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+119
在173个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+167
在160个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+86
在195个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+72
在208个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+132
在186个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+182
在247个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+897
在252个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+32
在233个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+26
在256个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+123
在255个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+75
在311个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+8
在274个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+22
在226个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+147
在219个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+174
在259个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+180
在210个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+320
在262个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+62
在241个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+150
在267个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+67
在316个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+164
在239个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+159
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+143
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+355
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+149
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+589
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+400
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+402
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+371
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+691
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+275
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+432
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+808
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+2 317
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+4 302
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '22
+5 273
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '22
+4 099
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '22
+2 341
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '22
+3 220
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '22
+3 034
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '22
+3 743
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '22
+8 600
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '21
+8 739
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '21
+13 953
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '21
+9 762
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '21
+13 120
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '21
+8 972
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '21
+6 631
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '21
+13 874
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '21
+2 685
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '21
+1 696
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '21
+2 039
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '21
+746
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '21
+1 613
在0个频道中
日期
订阅者增长
提及
频道
04 七月0
03 七月+9
02 七月+4
01 七月+3
频道帖子
Did you know that the World Cup kicked off at the WEF in Davos back in January with Gianni Infantino?
Did you know that the World Cup kicked off at the WEF in Davos back in January with Gianni Infantino?

2
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 2/2 There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, we’ve done away with morality and I don’t think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue that’s not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but it’s all there in a subliminal sense. It’s all already there. It’s all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether." Robin Monotti Read the full article here: https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from 2/2 📱 ROBINMG
2 674
3
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2 We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2 We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead "Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what it’s coming from: climate fearmongering. We know it’s coming from there, but we also know that there’s more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say: “I am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is what’s happening.” And we’d all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If you’ve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didn’t get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Who’s profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasn’t always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. That’s the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: it’s what needs to be said. It’s what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence. So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasn’t from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and we’re seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because there’s less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that it’s time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about. One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it? It’s morality. You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science? 1/2
2 336
4
Croatia's disallowed goal highlights scientism's core ideology that "data" is truth: but it is simply not. It is obvious to t+1
Croatia's disallowed goal highlights scientism's core ideology that "data" is truth: but it is simply not. It is obvious to the naked eye that the ball direction is not altered by the player's head. That is truth. The blip on the sensor could simply be put there later, it could correspond to an earlier or later touch. If it is isolated from the other previous or subsequent touches it could simply be an added graphic. Data is how to fool people that lies are truth, because it is the easiest thing to manipulate. Trust your own judgment always: you don't see a touch? There is no touch.
2 789
5
MY CLIMATE CRISIS REPORT As a climate correspondent I am risking my life from the European centre of the climate crisis to re
MY CLIMATE CRISIS REPORT As a climate correspondent I am risking my life from the European centre of the climate crisis to report the truth on the end times approaching. Here are the latest updates from the extreme heat. The end is near. We are all guilty. Repent!
3 407
6
The "Hockey Stick" graph of climate change is a hoax. It was falsified to erase the warm periods. This one derived from Vinos
The "Hockey Stick" graph of climate change is a hoax. It was falsified to erase the warm periods. This one derived from Vinos is the actual one. From Climate Change First Aid Kit By John Shewchuk
3 768
7
STANFORD UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR: MOST OF SCIENCE IS JUNK SCIENCE! "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" John P. A. I
STANFORD UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR: MOST OF SCIENCE IS JUNK SCIENCE! "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" John P. A. Ioannidis "There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false... Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias." John P. Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, Professor (by courtesy) of Statistics and Professor (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science.
3 958
8
CONGO: Where 60% of the world's cobalt for lithium-ion batteries that power smartphones, laptops and electric cars comes from
CONGO: Where 60% of the world's cobalt for lithium-ion batteries that power smartphones, laptops and electric cars comes from.
3 461
9
What is TCI? 'TCI is the “Thermosphere Climate Index”, a number NASA publishes every day to keep track of the temperature at the top of Earth’s atmosphere–a layer of gas researchers call “the thermosphere.” https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2022/03/23/what-is-tci/
3 099
10
"An historical record of the Thermosphere Climate Index. Mlynczak and colleagues recently published a paper on the TCI showin
"An historical record of the Thermosphere Climate Index. Mlynczak and colleagues recently published a paper on the TCI showing that the state of the thermosphere can be discussed using a set of five plain language terms: Cold, Cool, Neutral, Warm, and Hot."
3 442
11
NASA CONFIRMS THE SUN IS THE DRIVER OF TEMPERATURE ON EARTH “The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum–and it wa
NASA CONFIRMS THE SUN IS THE DRIVER OF TEMPERATURE ON EARTH “The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum–and it warms up again during Solar Maximum,” explains Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle affects our planet.” Mlynczak and colleagues recently introduced the “Thermosphere Climate Index” (TCI)–a number expressed in Watts that tells how much heat nitrogen oxide (NO) molecules in the thermosphere are dumping into space. During Solar Maximum, TCI is high (“Hot”); during Solar Minimum, it is low (“Cold”).
3 551
12
❗️British anti-terrorism police detain prominent US human rights attorney Dan Kovalik British anti-terrorism police at Liverp
❗️British anti-terrorism police detain prominent US human rights attorney Dan Kovalik British anti-terrorism police at Liverpool John Lennon Airport have detained US human rights attorney and international lawyer Dan Kovalik, sparking fresh condemnation over the UK’s expanding use of draconian border powers against prominent dissidents, independent journalists, and legal professionals. Kovalik, whose high-profile legal repertoire includes representing Colombian President Gustavo Petro, was subjected to intense interrogation under the country's sweeping counter-terrorism legislation. In a statement on X (formerly Twitter) Kovalik wrote: "In the height of irony, I was detained at John Lennon International AirPort in Liverpool, England by anti-terrorism police concerned about my opposition to the Genocide on Gaza and the war on Iran." ​According to statements released by Kovalik and independent monitoring groups, British authorities seized all of his electronic devices, including phones and laptops, and forced the submission of his biometric data—including fingerprints and DNA samples—under strict legal duress. Critics argue the operational overreach highlights a coordinated campaign by British political police to weaponize state security apparatuses to intimidate figures challenging western foreign policy narratives. ​The weaponization of Schedule 7 of the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 has increasingly drawn fire from international legal bodies, who warn that London is effectively operating a "bureaucratic dragnet" to suppress multi-polar advocacy and legal defense for Global South leaders. Kovalik’s detention mirrors a broader, systemic pattern of state-backed harassment at UK entry points, which human rights advocates state is designed to criminalize anti-imperialist dissent and compromise confidential legal data under the guise of national security.
3 581
13
NATO is the military wing of the World Economic Forum. It is the enemy army. Today the enemy are the globalists who run the W
NATO is the military wing of the World Economic Forum. It is the enemy army. Today the enemy are the globalists who run the WEF, it is not any single nation state. Do you agree?
3 680
14
NATO: MILITARY WING OF THE NWO "With Nazis well integrated into NATO and the CIA becoming an extension of Gehlen’s old Nazi i
NATO: MILITARY WING OF THE NWO "With Nazis well integrated into NATO and the CIA becoming an extension of Gehlen’s old Nazi intelligence agency, the Nieue World Ordnung was essentially relocated from the Reichstag in Berlin and dropped into the Pentagon and CIA Langley, Virginia" https://www.voltairenet.org/article174656.html
4 058
15
"NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Ba
"NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990 - Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow. Date Feb 9, 1990 "The most famous U.S. assurance to the Soviets on NATO expansion confirms the Soviet transcript of the same conversation. Repeating what Bush said at the Malta summit in December 1989, Baker tells Gorbachev: “The President and I have made clear that we seek no unilateral advantage in this process” of inevitable German unification. Baker goes on to say, “We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East. If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is a part of NATO, there would be no extension of NATO’s jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east.” Later in the conversation, Baker poses the same position as a question, “would you prefer a united Germany outside of NATO that is independent and has no US forces or would you prefer a united Germany with ties to NATO and assurances that there would be no extension of NATO’s current jurisdiction eastward?” The declassifiers of this memcon actually redacted Gorbachev’s response that indeed such an expansion would be “unacceptable” – but Baker’s letter to Kohl the next day, published in 1998 by the Germans, gives the quote." https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16116-document-05-memorandum-conversation-between ROBINMG 🚀
3 647
16
WHY NATURAL GAS IS THE CLEANEST ENERGY SOURCE: Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural
WHY NATURAL GAS IS THE CLEANEST ENERGY SOURCE: Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe. CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink. The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land. CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour. It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water. It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover. A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere. Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation. I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you. Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions.
5 339
17
The narrative being prepared in the Financial corporate press is that the coming crash will be caused by defaults on loans ta
The narrative being prepared in the Financial corporate press is that the coming crash will be caused by defaults on loans taken on to build the Data Centres once it becomes clear AI is not the El Dorado it was sold as. This is what the "Great Reset" will be blamed on.
4 076
18
The whole CO2 hoax was born out of Al Gore misunderstanding that CO2 rises follow global warming: they do not precede it. Thi
The whole CO2 hoax was born out of Al Gore misunderstanding that CO2 rises follow global warming: they do not precede it. This is because the Oceans are the largest store of CO2 & release it as they warm up. Same with carbonated (fizzy) water: try it.
4 255
19
If it is certainly true that gender roles are socially constructed, it is also true that social construction should not be presented as a homogeneous feature that only serves to diminish, obstruct, and oppress. The alleged neutrality of Liberal Feminism is nothing but a lie, as it ignores this reality, only to shape a new world where corporations can maximise the consumers of their product: one good for all." https://www.savageminds.co/p/feminism-intercepted 📱 ROBINMG
4 143
20
Feminism intercepted How the Bourgeoisie Seized Women’s Struggle LAURA CESARETTI Excerpts: "Liberal feminism belongs to the particular and individualistic kind of society in which we are living nowadays, the sort of vision pushed in the mid-twentieth century by the likes of Ayn Rand, who considered being selfish and self-reliant a rock that cannot be broken, all couched within a philosophical system of rational self-interest which she called Objectivism. Rand’s theories were themselves a product of the US post-Second World War economic boom. Documentary filmmaker Yasha Levine of the Nefarious Russians describes this ethos as a psyop fostered by Americans through films, books, and art. Consequentially, Rand’s notions of rational self-interest had a boom in the Reagan and Thatcher years and have expanded across American culture to include its “colonies” of which Italy is just one of many. Media propaganda rejected full-time motherhood just as it labelled breastfeeding as a sign of backwardness and pushed women to work. Consumerism of any kind has become the symbol of breaking from a past of poverty and advancing towards a modern future of ostensible liberation. The idea of humans as individuals, not communities, began to surface, along with the idea of self-realisation and the right to pursue personal freedom ahead of anything else. It is there that liberal feminism rose, becoming mainstream amid America’s suburban culture and ultimately reaching Italy shortly there after. Rather than a struggle against the oppression of patriarchy, feminism focused on the isolation of the modern nuclear family, which American feminist Betty Friedan famously defined as a “comfortable concentration camp” that oppressed women. Coincidentally, such feminist musings emanated mainly from the new bourgeoisie. What was unbearable, then, was not the overwhelming amount of housework and childcare; instead, it was the boredom and loneliness that occurred in women’s spare time, which they learnt to cure with alcohol, sexual adventures, or an obsessive interest in their children. From this milieu comes the idea that women’s empowerment means entering the business world exactly like men. These feminists believed that entering the masculine world of competitive achievement would cure the “problem that has no name,” intercepting the struggle of working-class women together with those who come from a different cultural environment or those who struggle with racial violence. While Western feminists argue about the right to be or not to be a mother, the global women’s health movement emerging in Latin America, Africa and Asia, has pointed out that due to centuries of slavery and colonialism, for non-white women, reproductive injustice has also involved the forced denial of motherhood. Under slavery, black women were forced to nurse the children of white mothers instead of their own for instance. At the time, there were only a few critical voices, such as that of Pier Paolo Pasolini who warned that the quest for emancipation is leading Italians from a nuclear family to a family of consumers. From the moment women rightfully progress toward emancipation, the whole society regresses because it is consumeristic society that takes up her educational role. Pasolini, like Rafanelli, addresses the bourgeoisie as the class that shapes modern society. As holders of power, the elite class has no interest in educating a child; instead, their aim has only been to educate the children in societal adaptions where children are future labourers and consumers. In this way, liberation and emancipation are concepts that depend entirely upon the transformation of the individual to consumer, with the imperative that the individual must maintain and reinforce the status quo.
3 828