KR

A fatwāʾ is not a simple act of transmission, but rather, it must be constituted by some sort of knowledge. The Social Logic Of Taqlīd And The Rise Of The Mukhtaṣar (p.203), by Mohammed Fadel https://t.me/bahruloom

https://www.facebook.com/100090646519330/posts/1044008108630730/ Interesting

Shaykh Ḥasan Bukhārīs findings in this particular chapter are quite interesting, as he demonstrates with istiqrāʾ of Sharḥ Mushkil al-Āthār that Ṭaḥāwīs understanding and application of takhṣīṣ al-ʿām in this work, was in line with the majority of Uṣūliyyūn rather than the Ḥanafī Uṣūliyyūn, who are much more restrictive in their definition and conditions for takhṣīṣ. https://t.me/bahruloom

Salafis: We test the innovators with Shaykh Rabi. Everyone else: We test the Salafis with Uthman Ibn Farooq.

Uthman Ibn Farooq isn’t qualified to even give da’wah. The Internet is now awash with Christians hammering him with his مسحاء blunder. Do we really expect a Christian who is sincere in seeking the truth not to be affected by this blatant error and gross deception by UbF? I would venture to say many have been turned away from embracing Islam because of UbF’s incompetence. Yet now, he’s the face of street da’wah online for Islam.

The Baqillani of our age, subduer of the Christians.

UbF giving Christians a new lease of life through his incompetence.

One reason Muslims need to be far more vocal than anyone else in denouncing Uthman Faruq as a fraud and charlatan is that even if they don't, he will inevitably be exposed as one by Christians (indeed this has already happened with his hadith fabrication fiasco and now his lies about his fake 1 vs 20 debate). We have to take the lead in exposing him as a lying fraud and charlatan so that Christian apologists are not able to weaponise his "Baqillani of the era" status for point scoring in the public discourse. The least harm of this would be that it would reinforce in the minds of their followers the impression that if this is the best Muslims have to offer, Islam must not be a serious religion.

I know there is talk going on these days about whether Uthman faked his "Masters in Hadith", and I do think it's important to expose him if he's lying about this, but I just want to point out, this man fabricated a hadith out of a footnote typo. I don't care if he does have a master's or even a phd in hadith, it will not wash away the shame of his hadith fabrication (regardless of whether it was deliberate or just a result of deep incompetence).

There is one person who is primarily responsible for the revival of Christian Fundamentalism in the West. It’s Uthman bin Farooq the Fraudster.

Uthman Farooq's debates are as fake as his stabbings and his made-up hadiths. Colour me shocked https://youtube.com/watch?v=fw_wL6XAygg&si=_ayAwbhDdqT1Wuvd

Disregard the title. Tariq Masood delves into the psychology of Hanafi-Ahle Hadis debates in the Sub-Continent and offers some decent analysis. Listen right to the end for a noteworthy remark regarding the book إعلاء السنن https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1bXeox8mqd/

الحديقة الندية شرح الطريقة المحمدية لعبد الغني النابلسي تـ ١١٤٣ هـ To spell it out, a Hanafi Mufti must not condemn fellow Hanafis if their practice conflicts with the position of Imam Abu Hanifah but coincides with another scholar/school. Details can be disputed here on the specific examples offered here, but there is no doubt that the only way to a more harmonious co-existence is by recognising, acknowledging, upholding, and implementing this principle.

الدرر المباحة في الحظر والإباحة للنحلاوي الحنفي تـ ١٣٥٠ هـ

Discussion on the theory of lost Hanafi Hadiths. https://t.me/c/1377422700/162236/300557

Was Hafs the business partner of Abu Hanifah? https://t.me/c/1377422700/162753/300531

Ibid on the wiping of the nape in Wudu: all narrations are defective.

Ibid on wiping the nape in Wudu: all the narrations indicative of standalone wiping are defective.

Yunus Jaunpuri (d. 1438 AH) in al-Yawaqit al-Ghaliyah on why the Sufis were extremely poor at Hadith - save for a few.