Exposing Hitler as Zionist

"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Joseph Goebbels, 1925 Even various Nazis admitted their intense similarities with the communists. My thesis of CommuNazism proven true over and over again. Nazis are "racial communists" who add ethnic in-group preference to communistic economic policies of total collectivization.

Neo-Nazi groups like Goyim TV (what a retarded name for a group) work hand in hand with the media to make it seem like Nazism, and therefore ''Hate'' and Anti-Semitism are on the rise. The media and Jews love using these sort of groups to support their narratives about ''White supremacy''.

'Theodore Herzl, the father of Zionism, indeed saw antisemites as potential allies in his quest for a Jewish homeland. In his 1896 book "Der Judenstaat" (The Jewish State), Herzl argued that antisemitic governments could be persuaded to support Jewish emigration to Palestine if it relieved them of their "Jewish problem." This pragmatic approach led him to meet with prominent antisemites like Count von Plehve, the Russian Interior Minister, and even Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany.' Isn't just perfectly convenient that Herzl's plan was to relieve European nations of the Jewish Question and to be sent to Palestine to establish Israel? The persecution of Jews by Nazi's was the cattle prod to get them to move to the hostile middle east from their cushy European lifestyles.

The media has strongly linked nationalism with Nazism so that people can be vilified the same way (as Nazis are) for wanting to retain their nations and not be swarmed with mass immigration. This is why the left immediately calls you a Nazi as soon as you start speaking in terms of nationalism. World War II had numerous objectives, and one of the big ones was associating nationalism with Nazism in the public’s mind. After World War II, the West was hammered with anti-nationalist propaganda for decades so that the rise of Nazism (nationalism) would never happen again. This guilt over nationalistic pride was especially pushed on the English, who were guilt-tripped and whose good nature was taken advantage of. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvXH3ygnUWY

The media has strongly linked nationalism with Nazism so that people can be demonized in the same way for wanting to retain their nations and not be swarmed with mass immigration. This is why the left immediately calls you a Nazi as soon as you start speaking in terms of nationalism. WW2 had numerous objectives and one of the big ones was associating nationalism with Nazism in the public's mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvXH3ygnUWY

'Adolf Hitler attending the exhibition of ancient Japanese arts in Berlin.' Did the Nazi's celebrate European arts or history in anyway prior to invading? What makes modern neo-Nazi's believe that the Nazi's were at all pro-White? I don't see any evidence.

Much of the ground work for this subject was laid by Jim Condit Jr. This video is rather dry and informational but he got the ball rolling. Christopher Jon Bjerknes took the ball and ran with it. The first book he wrote on the subject was very good but the 2nd and 3rd went off the rails. Now you can't really trust anything CJB says but he was putting out good material on Einstein and Hitler in the late 90's/00's.

The-FInal-Solution-to-Adolf-Hitler-Jim-Condit-Jr

“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” ― Napoleon Bonaparte

“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” ― Napoleon Bonaparte

The Deadly Embrace by Read and Fisher is a good book on the alliance between the USSR and Germany.

'Why have we been taught that globalism is great & nationalism is evil. They blame it for WWII, but did you know that the nationalist America First committee was the largest anti-war movement in American history prior to World War II. Why do you think they don’t teach us that?' One of the main objectives of WW2 was to associate Nazism with nationalism and later White supremacy/racism.

I'm killing the chat group for a while until I can get the spam bots under control. Cheers

If Hitler was so hell bent on expanding Germany's borders and creating wealth through conquest, why wouldn't he attack a non-allied European nation? He just HAD to attack a nation that would violate the Treaty of Versailles and instigate an allied military response. Why not just attack a non-White nation and actually be consistent with Nazi racial ideologies? Instead, the Nazi's invaded White nations, in this sequence: Austria Czechoslovakia Poland Denmark Norway Luxembourg The Netherlands Belgium France Yugoslavia Greece You often see Nazi propaganda talking about ''stopping brother wars'' and insinuating that Germany was just defending itself, and it was the Allied forces that were attacking their brothers. However, they leave out the fact that Nazi Germany was instigating so called brother wars in WW1 and 2. They invaded 4 in WW1 and a dozen European nations in WW2 alone. How is that based? And who can take Nazi Germany's racial ideologies when they made all kinds of loopholes and exceptions, while contradicting it completely by invading Germanic/Nordic nations.

If Hitler was so hell bent on expanding Germany's borders and creating wealth through conquest, why wouldn't he attack a non-allied European nation? He just HAD to attack a nation that would violate the Treaty of Versailles and instigate an allied military response. Why not just attack a non-White nation and actually be consistent with Nazi racial ideologies? Instead the Nazi's invaded White nations, in this sequence. Austria Czechoslovakia Poland Denmark Norway Luxembourg The Netherlands Belgium France Yugoslavia Greece You often see Nazi propaganda talking about ''stopping brother wars'' and insinuating that Germany was just defending itself, and it was the Allied forces that were attacking their brothers. However, they leave out the fact that Nazi Germany was instigating so called brother wars in WW1 and 2. They invaded 4 in WW1 and a dozen European nations in WW2 alone. How is that based?

The Nazi's stole over 175,000 church bells during WW2 from various European nations and melted them down for artillery and war supplies.

Align with other Europeans/European Nations? Nahhh, we'll attack them and align with non-Whites.

So was the Nazi reason for invading Poland justified? A balanced assessment would be: True: Germany had lost territory after WWI that contained millions of ethnic Germans, and many Germans genuinely believed the Treaty of Versailles had been unfair. True: Some disputed regions had German majorities and had been part of Germany for decades or centuries. False or misleading: The invasion of Poland was merely an effort to recover those lands. Germany invaded and occupied the entire country, and Nazi plans envisioned permanent conquest, colonization, and the elimination of Poland as a sovereign nation. In other words, the territorial disputes were real, but they do not fully explain the 1939 invasion. They served as a politically effective justification for a much larger expansionist program that extended far beyond the areas Germany had lost after World War I. When Neo-Nazi's use this tired old argument for taking back parts of Germany that were given to Poland, they skip over the fact that 2.8M White Poles were killed, and they leveled Warsaw flat and terrorized hundreds of villages. Poland was also getting slammed from the East by the Soviets in a secret alliance called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pack—most neo-Nazi's usually aren't aware of the Bolshevik-Nazi collusion.

So was the Nazi reason for invading Poland justified? A balanced assessment would be: True: Germany had lost territory after WWI that contained millions of ethnic Germans, and many Germans genuinely believed the Treaty of Versailles had been unfair. True: Some disputed regions had German majorities and had been part of Germany for decades or centuries. False or misleading: The invasion of Poland was merely an effort to recover those lands. Germany invaded and occupied the entire country, and Nazi plans envisioned permanent conquest, colonization, and the elimination of Poland as a sovereign nation. In other words, the territorial disputes were real, but they do not fully explain the 1939 invasion. They served as a politically effective justification for a much larger expansionist program that extended far beyond the areas Germany had lost after World War I. When Neo-Nazi's use this tired old argument for taking back parts of Germany that were given to Poland, they skip over the fact that 2.8M White Poles were killed, and they leveled Warsaw flat and terrorized hundreds of villages. Poland was also getting slammed from the East by the Soviets in a secret alliance called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pack, which most neo-Nazi's usually aren't aware of the Bolshevik-Nazi collusion.