Exposing Hitler as Zionist

'Adolf Hitler attending the exhibition of ancient Japanese arts in Berlin.' Did the Nazi's celebrate European arts or history in anyway prior to invading? What makes modern neo-Nazi's believe that the Nazi's were at all pro-White? I don't see any evidence.

Much of the ground work for this subject was laid by Jim Condit Jr. This video is rather dry and informational but he got the ball rolling. Christopher Jon Bjerknes took the ball and ran with it. The first book he wrote on the subject was very good but the 2nd and 3rd went off the rails. Now you can't really trust anything CJB says but he was putting out good material on Einstein and Hitler in the late 90's/00's.

The-FInal-Solution-to-Adolf-Hitler-Jim-Condit-Jr

“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” ― Napoleon Bonaparte

“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” ― Napoleon Bonaparte

The Deadly Embrace by Read and Fisher is a good book on the alliance between the USSR and Germany.

'Why have we been taught that globalism is great & nationalism is evil. They blame it for WWII, but did you know that the nationalist America First committee was the largest anti-war movement in American history prior to World War II. Why do you think they don’t teach us that?' One of the main objectives of WW2 was to associate Nazism with nationalism and later White supremacy/racism.

I'm killing the chat group for a while until I can get the spam bots under control. Cheers

If Hitler was so hell bent on expanding Germany's borders and creating wealth through conquest, why wouldn't he attack a non-allied European nation? He just HAD to attack a nation that would violate the Treaty of Versailles and instigate an allied military response. Why not just attack a non-White nation and actually be consistent with Nazi racial ideologies? Instead, the Nazi's invaded White nations, in this sequence: Austria Czechoslovakia Poland Denmark Norway Luxembourg The Netherlands Belgium France Yugoslavia Greece You often see Nazi propaganda talking about ''stopping brother wars'' and insinuating that Germany was just defending itself, and it was the Allied forces that were attacking their brothers. However, they leave out the fact that Nazi Germany was instigating so called brother wars in WW1 and 2. They invaded 4 in WW1 and a dozen European nations in WW2 alone. How is that based? And who can take Nazi Germany's racial ideologies when they made all kinds of loopholes and exceptions, while contradicting it completely by invading Germanic/Nordic nations.

If Hitler was so hell bent on expanding Germany's borders and creating wealth through conquest, why wouldn't he attack a non-allied European nation? He just HAD to attack a nation that would violate the Treaty of Versailles and instigate an allied military response. Why not just attack a non-White nation and actually be consistent with Nazi racial ideologies? Instead the Nazi's invaded White nations, in this sequence. Austria Czechoslovakia Poland Denmark Norway Luxembourg The Netherlands Belgium France Yugoslavia Greece You often see Nazi propaganda talking about ''stopping brother wars'' and insinuating that Germany was just defending itself, and it was the Allied forces that were attacking their brothers. However, they leave out the fact that Nazi Germany was instigating so called brother wars in WW1 and 2. They invaded 4 in WW1 and a dozen European nations in WW2 alone. How is that based?

The Nazi's stole over 175,000 church bells during WW2 from various European nations and melted them down for artillery and war supplies.

Align with other Europeans/European Nations? Nahhh, we'll attack them and align with non-Whites.

So was the Nazi reason for invading Poland justified? A balanced assessment would be: True: Germany had lost territory after WWI that contained millions of ethnic Germans, and many Germans genuinely believed the Treaty of Versailles had been unfair. True: Some disputed regions had German majorities and had been part of Germany for decades or centuries. False or misleading: The invasion of Poland was merely an effort to recover those lands. Germany invaded and occupied the entire country, and Nazi plans envisioned permanent conquest, colonization, and the elimination of Poland as a sovereign nation. In other words, the territorial disputes were real, but they do not fully explain the 1939 invasion. They served as a politically effective justification for a much larger expansionist program that extended far beyond the areas Germany had lost after World War I. When Neo-Nazi's use this tired old argument for taking back parts of Germany that were given to Poland, they skip over the fact that 2.8M White Poles were killed, and they leveled Warsaw flat and terrorized hundreds of villages. Poland was also getting slammed from the East by the Soviets in a secret alliance called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pack—most neo-Nazi's usually aren't aware of the Bolshevik-Nazi collusion.

So was the Nazi reason for invading Poland justified? A balanced assessment would be: True: Germany had lost territory after WWI that contained millions of ethnic Germans, and many Germans genuinely believed the Treaty of Versailles had been unfair. True: Some disputed regions had German majorities and had been part of Germany for decades or centuries. False or misleading: The invasion of Poland was merely an effort to recover those lands. Germany invaded and occupied the entire country, and Nazi plans envisioned permanent conquest, colonization, and the elimination of Poland as a sovereign nation. In other words, the territorial disputes were real, but they do not fully explain the 1939 invasion. They served as a politically effective justification for a much larger expansionist program that extended far beyond the areas Germany had lost after World War I. When Neo-Nazi's use this tired old argument for taking back parts of Germany that were given to Poland, they skip over the fact that 2.8M White Poles were killed, and they leveled Warsaw flat and terrorized hundreds of villages. Poland was also getting slammed from the East by the Soviets in a secret alliance called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pack, which most neo-Nazi's usually aren't aware of the Bolshevik-Nazi collusion.

So was the Nazi justification for invading Poland justified? A balanced assessment would be: True: Germany had lost territory after WWI that contained millions of ethnic Germans, and many Germans genuinely believed the Treaty of Versailles had been unfair. True: Some disputed regions had German majorities and had been part of Germany for decades or centuries. False or misleading: The invasion of Poland was merely an effort to recover those lands. Germany invaded and occupied the entire country, and Nazi plans envisioned permanent conquest, colonization, and the elimination of Poland as a sovereign nation. In other words, the territorial disputes were real, but they do not fully explain the 1939 invasion. They served as a politically effective justification for a much larger expansionist program that extended far beyond the areas Germany had lost after World War I. When Neo-Nazi's use this tired old argument for taking back parts of Germany that were given to Poland, they skip over the fact that 2.8M White Poles were killed, and they leveled Warsaw flat and terrorized hundreds of villages. Poland was also getting slammed from the East by the Soviets in a secret alliance called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pack, which most neo-Nazi's usually aren't aware of the Bolshevik-Nazi collusion.

How Hitler exported his financial problems to other countries and built an economic model based on foreign conquest. Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQKM5b1SoS0 Follow @redideologies

Continuation of: https://t.me/exposinghitler/1085 Image is From: David Irving, Hitler's War. This is what the neo-Nazis are cheering for. "An SS major was in command. Among those executed were also 5 or 6 [White Polish] children aged from two to eight years old." And I know for a fact that an immediate response from the Nazis might be "those cruel acts against the White Polish kids were just a response to the persecution of ethnic Germans living in Polish territories. " And here is the refutation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eGaNuErtNHDF/ And the Bomberg massacre (which itself started only on 3rd September) was instigated by Abwehr: "By 2007 after several years of studying German archives, documents were uncovered in which General Erwin Lahousen praised action of German saboteurs in Bydgoszcz and organized delivery of supplies and medical help to them. German historian Jochen Böhler, in his publication about the invasion of Poland, published in 2006, wrote that new documents uncovered from the German archives proved that Polish soldiers were attacked by Abwehr Agents and members of the German minority." Yes that's right Hitler literally instigated a massacre that might result in the killing of ethnic Germans, so that he can use this as a reason why he attacked Poland, when in reality the real reason why he badly wanted to attack Poland is revealed in his May 1939 Speech. After all, Hitler said he will fabricate the cause of war, the Gleitzwitz incident, Jabłonków incident, and this instigation of the massacre in Bomberg, all speak for themselves, that he really meant when he said he will fabricate the cause of the war.

The "Economic Miracle" was due to massive rearmament (deficit spending on military), public works (Autobahn, etc.), conscription/labor service (RAD). It's not a free-market success at all. It was heavy state control, suppressed wages, longer hours (up 15%+), and "Strength Through Joy" (KdF). The recovery was military Keynesianism on steroids—borrowing heavily and gearing the economy for war. It wasn't sustainable without military conquest. When you conscript millions of people and massively increase spending on all of the industries surrounding the military. So like a socialist nation that they were, all of the funding was coming from future tax burdens in order to pay for the military and government programs. They didn't just fund innovative industries and independent businesses in an capitalistic, open-market kind of way, everything was state run and geared towards supporting their military.

"Hitler's anti-communism was a complete farce" Six points proving Hitler's opposition to communism was fake and self-serving

Jews in the Nazi Army