Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
315
Підписники
+224 години
+47 днів
-130 день
Триває завантаження даних...
Схожі канали
Хмара тегів
Вхідні та вихідні згадування
---
---
---
---
---
---
Залучення підписників
червень '26
червень '26
+10
в 3 каналах
травень '26
+11
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '26
+7
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
березень '26
+8
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '26
+10
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
січень '26
+6
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '25
+4
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '25
+18
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '25
+6
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '25
+21
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '25
+4
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
липень '25
+3
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
червень '25
+4
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
травень '25
+5
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '25
+3
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
березень '25
+16
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '25
+11
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
січень '25
+21
в 10 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '24
+9
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '24
+7
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '24
+11
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '24
+9
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '24
+11
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
липень '24
+2
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
червень '24
+12
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
травень '24
+9
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '24
+9
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
березень '24
+15
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '24
+9
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
січень '24
+35
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '23
+8
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '23
+255
в 1 каналах
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 27 червня | 0 | |||
| 26 червня | +2 | |||
| 25 червня | 0 | |||
| 24 червня | 0 | |||
| 23 червня | +2 | |||
| 22 червня | +1 | |||
| 21 червня | 0 | |||
| 20 червня | 0 | |||
| 19 червня | 0 | |||
| 18 червня | 0 | |||
| 17 червня | +2 | |||
| 16 червня | 0 | |||
| 15 червня | 0 | |||
| 14 червня | 0 | |||
| 13 червня | 0 | |||
| 12 червня | 0 | |||
| 11 червня | +2 | |||
| 10 червня | +1 | |||
| 09 червня | 0 | |||
| 08 червня | 0 | |||
| 07 червня | 0 | |||
| 06 червня | 0 | |||
| 05 червня | 0 | |||
| 04 червня | 0 | |||
| 03 червня | 0 | |||
| 02 червня | 0 | |||
| 01 червня | 0 |
Дописи каналу
| 2 | https://x.com/i/status/2070469038573007140 | 39 |
| 3 | Dear Patriot,
It is darn near impossible to remove an incumbent politician - much less one who has served two terms in the US Senate.
The incumbent has massive cash available to them, state-wide name recognition, control of the state party and the ability to make deals. Or as they said in the old days…grease palms.
Sign up for our newsletter here: https://defendingtherepublic.substack.com/p/maga-is-cleaning-out-the-dirty-rino-99b?publication_id=726749&post_id=198193180&isFreemail=true&r=2j3x4&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email | 35 |
| 4 |  🔒 Take back control of your digital life! Say goodbye to BigTech harvesting your data. In just 30 days, we provide:
📱 Ghost Phone
💻 Ghost Tablet or Laptop
📧 Free Email Service for a year
🔒 Secure Productivity Apps Training
🗨 Secure Comms Training
🛒 Private Online Shopping Training
📞 Secure Voice/Text/Data Service Provider (1st month free)
Start with a private consultation, and our team will guide you every step of the way. Understand how your data is used and reclaim your digital sovereignty.
https://mark37.com/request-a-free-consultation/ | 26 |
| 5 |  While blue states are working to protect criminals, Idaho just put in an express lane for execution of convicts - LET'S GO!
Starting July 1, the state will become the only one in the nation to use the firing squad as the primary method of execution.
Procedures have been finalized, where the execution team will be made up of three volunteer shooters, two alternatives and a leader of the team.
In order to qualify, those taking part have to be POST-certified officers. They need at least three years of service and have no recent firearms or excessive force disciplinary actions.
They also have to demonstrate 100% accuracy from 21 feet away.
It's totally voluntary and officers are allowed to withdraw at any time and not face a penalty. | 28 |
| 6 | BREAKING: Alex Stein CONFRONTS ClarkCounty School District School Board
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xI94ah2ysZY&is=OMy1LphBDYcjnDzQ | 29 |
| 7 |  Following lengthy negotiations between the United States, Israel, and Lebanon, representatives of the three countries signed a trilateral framework this evening aimed at paving the way for future agreements between Israel and Lebanon, with the goal of ending the conflict between the two countries and ultimately reaching a peace arrangement.
Israel will maintain its security zone along the Yellow Line in Lebanon until Hezbollah and all other terrorist organizations in Lebanon are disarmed and no longer pose a threat to the State of Israel from Lebanese territory.
The IDF will retain full freedom of military action throughout the security zone to eliminate threats of any kind.
Israel and Lebanon also agreed on two areas adjacent to the Yellow Line, recommended by the IDF, where a pilot program will be implemented to dismantle Hezbollah infrastructure and transfer control of the territory to the Lebanese Armed Forces: one area outside the Yellow Line and south of the Litani River, and another outside the original Yellow Line and north of the Litani River.
The trilateral framework represents a major achievement for Israel, rejecting Iran's attempt to force a unilateral Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon and denying both Iran and Hezbollah any role in Lebanon. | 23 |
| 8 | Looks like Amir jumped the gun a few days back when he was expressing frustration at Trump's peace deal...
I say it a lot.... Let's see what happens. | 30 |
| 9 | THE THEATER OF ILLUSION THAT ANNOUNCES THE END OF REALITY!
Look closely at these effects. It's not cinema, it's not Hollywood post-production… it's a live theater performance in Japan.
The precision of the lights, the smoke, and the synchronization with the actors is so perfect that it blows your mind.
This isn't just a show. It's irrefutable proof that technology already dominates human perception right in plain sight. | 30 |
| 10 | Having problems with pests? Go to a 100 year long remedy Borax. https://youtu.be/IYdYTHu7ObI?is=7HQc-XM-zuGuobVz | 30 |
| 11 | https://youtu.be/L9aU2LwRFVs?is=BXCyaFg7BRsCh0c0 | 39 |
| 12 | Fun fact:
The Communist Control Act of 1954 was passed into federal law, to combat the Communist Party of the United States.
The CPUSA was labeled an illegitimate party, that was the arm of a foreign conspiracy, seeking to overthrow the US government. Sound familiar?
That’s what we are witnessing right now with the Democrat Party in the present day United States. The DNC is no longer a legitimate US political party. These are unlawful enemy combatants, pretending to be a political party, with intent to overthrow the United States government.
They are not operating on behalf of the American People. They are part of a foreign conspiracy, which is trying to infiltrate and subvert the United States from within. The DNC/Left was the entry point for Communism to reach the United States, under the guise of “progress”.
This is not a game. The Dems are quite literally enemies of the United States, trying to exterminate and replace the American People, and the only way this country prospers, is if we expel this illegitimate party from our nation, exterminate this poisonous Left-wing ideology from our society, and hold all the traitors to the fullest extent of the law. | 25 |
| 13 |  Most Muslims believe the only thing preventing Islam from taking over the world is America.
Muslims view their presence in America solely as a religious call to undermine the country and achieve that goal.
“We are in the belly of the beast, and we need to strike the heart of the Empire to bring it down.”
Muslims in America are working to destroy the country from within, and they are allying with progressive useful idiots.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social | 32 |
| 14 | Means-tested welfare spending has grown from relatively modest levels in the mid-1960s to over a trillion dollars annually in recent federal figures (plus state contributions), encompassing dozens of programs. Official poverty metrics improved modestly at first due to economic growth and transfers, then stagnated in behavioral terms. The explosion in single-parent households and nonmarital births tracks the welfare expansion and its incentive structure more closely than it tracks racism, deindustrialization alone, or other popular explanations.
The 1996 reforms proved that changing incentives changes outcomes. Caseloads fell, work rose, and some of the worst poverty traps eased—until expansions in other programs and cultural shifts partially offset gains. The broader lesson remains: systems that pay people to remain outside the labor market and outside stable family structures will produce more of both.
Cloward and Piven wanted to end poverty by overloading the system and forcing a guaranteed income. What emerged instead was an overburdened, fragmented, and enormously expensive welfare state that subsidizes dependency, amplifies class rhetoric, and anchors a significant population to government support. That population, in turn, provides reliable political support for the very policies that sustain the cycle.
This was not an accidental byproduct. It was the foreseeable result of a strategy that treated welfare rules as weapons to create crisis rather than as tools to encourage self-sufficiency. Decades later, the costs—in family structure, human capital, fiscal burden, and political polarization—are still being paid.
The alternative is not indifference to hardship. It is welfare designed around work, marriage, and mobility—policies that treat adults as capable agents rather than permanent clients. The data from the pre-Great Society era and from the 1996 reforms show that economic growth plus incentive-aligned safety nets reduce poverty more effectively than engineered overload ever did. The Cloward-Piven legacy stands as a warning: when you subsidize dependency at scale and tie political power to it, you do not eliminate poverty. You institutionalize it. | 42 |
| 15 | The 1996 welfare reform (PRWORA), which replaced AFDC with TANF and imposed work requirements and time limits, produced caseload drops of over 60%, increased employment among single mothers, and modest improvements in child poverty metrics in many states. That reform worked precisely because it reversed key incentive distortions the earlier system had baked in.
The Cloward-Piven approach—maximize enrollment, minimize conditions—did the opposite. It subsidized behaviors that correlate strongly with persistent poverty: single parenthood, low work effort, and reliance on transfers rather than earnings or family support. In doing so, it helped manufacture more people who needed the system. Dependency is not just an unfortunate side effect; under these rules, it is a predictable outcome.
Bolshevik-Style Class Warfare
The strategy also fed a narrative of permanent class conflict. By framing poverty as a failure of “the system” requiring ever-larger state intervention, it shifted focus from individual agency, family structure, culture, and economic growth to redistribution from “the rich” to “the poor.” This echoes older revolutionary tactics: aggravate contradictions, mobilize the disaffected, and use crisis to force expropriation and central control.
In practice, it pitted working taxpayers—many of them middle-class or aspiring working-class—against net recipients. The “rich” in this framing are often two-earner families, small business owners, and skilled tradespeople whose payroll and income taxes fund the administrative state and transfers. Meanwhile, the welfare apparatus itself became a major employer and political constituency. Billions flow not just to recipients but to caseworkers, nonprofits, consultants, and bureaucracies invested in managing (rather than ending) poverty.
This is not organic class consciousness. It is manufactured division sustained by policy design. When poverty is redefined as whatever the state says it is, and when benefits expand faster than wages for low-skill work, the political economy rewards grievance over mobility. The result resembles the clientelism seen in various socialist experiments: a dependent population whose immediate interests align with the party or faction that controls the spigot.
A Permanent Class of Government-Dependent Voters
The most durable political consequence is the creation of a reliable voting bloc tethered to the welfare state. Means-tested program recipients—SNAP, Medicaid, housing assistance, EITC supplements, and legacy cash aid—disproportionately support the political party most associated with expanding and defending these programs. Self-reported data and household surveys consistently show higher lifetime or current participation among Democratic-leaning voters. Low-income and net-transfer households vote heavily Democratic in national and local elections.
This is not conspiracy; it is public choice economics in action. Concentrated benefits create concentrated political support. Diffuse costs (taxes, debt, slower growth, family breakdown) are harder to organize against. Politicians who promise more transfers or looser eligibility gain reliable constituencies. Those who push work requirements, time limits, or cuts face organized opposition from recipients, administrators, and allied interest groups.
The cycle reinforces itself. Long-term welfare participation correlates with lower workforce attachment and different family formation patterns. Children raised in high-dependency households are more likely to enter the same system as adults. The strategy did not merely expand rolls in the 1960s–70s; it helped institutionalize a subclass whose economic security is tied to government policy rather than private earnings, marriage, or community. That subclass votes accordingly.
The Record Since the 1960s | 37 |
| 16 | The Cloward-Piven Strategy: How Overloading the Welfare System Created Dependency, Class Division, and a Permanent Political Underclass
In 1966, sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven published “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in *The Nation*. Their proposal was straightforward and radical: mobilize the poor—especially those eligible but not yet enrolled—to flood the welfare system with applications. By overwhelming local and state bureaucracies and budgets with legitimate claims, they argued, a fiscal and political crisis would erupt. This crisis would then force the federal government to replace the fragmented, inadequate welfare patchwork with a national guaranteed annual income, effectively ending poverty through massive redistribution.
The authors were not subtle about the mechanism. They saw existing welfare rules as tools that kept the poor disorganized and compliant. Mass enrollment would expose the system’s contradictions, create chaos in Democratic-run cities, and compel a leftward shift in national policy. The National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), which they helped influence, put elements of this into practice through protests, legal challenges, and aggressive enrollment drives in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
What Actually Happened
The strategy aligned with broader Great Society expansions under Lyndon Johnson and subsequent policies. AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) caseloads exploded. In 1966, roughly 4.5–5 million people received benefits. By 1972, that number had more than doubled to over 10.9 million. In New York City—the epicenter of the activism—rolls surged from around 500,000 to over 1.1 million, contributing directly to the city’s near-bankruptcy in 1975. Participation rates among eligible families rose sharply as administrative barriers fell and outreach intensified.
This was not organic growth from economic downturn alone. Court rulings (such as *Goldberg v. Kelly* in 1970) made it harder to remove people from rolls without due process. Welfare rights activists actively recruited. The system was deliberately stressed.
The promised guaranteed income never arrived in the form Cloward and Piven envisioned. Instead, the overload produced backlash: fiscal strain, public resentment, and eventual reforms. But the damage to incentives and family structure was already done. The strategy succeeded in expanding the welfare state dramatically; it failed at its stated goal of lifting people out of poverty through systemic redesign. What it helped create was something more durable and destructive: entrenched dependency.
Creating More Poor Through Dependency
Welfare programs are not neutral transfers. Their rules shape behavior. Pre-1996 AFDC rules often penalized marriage and work. A “man in the house” could disqualify a family. Earnings above very low thresholds triggered sharp benefit cliffs—effective marginal tax rates of 50%, 70%, or even over 100% when combining loss of cash aid, food stamps, Medicaid, and housing subsidies. Rational people responded to the incentives.
The results are visible in the data. Nonmarital birth rates stood around 8% in the mid-1960s. They climbed steadily to over 40% today. Single-mother families—once a small share of the poor—now account for the majority of child poverty cases. Official poverty rates for single-mother households remain stubbornly high (around 28–40% depending on the measure), even as trillions in means-tested spending flowed. The safety net reduces measured poverty on paper (especially under the Supplemental Poverty Measure), but it has not reversed the behavioral trends that keep families poor across generations.
Critics from Thomas Sowell to Charles Murray to Robert Rector have documented how the post-1960s welfare expansion correlated with the breakdown of two-parent households, declining labor force attachment among prime-age men in some communities, and the rise of long-term welfare use. | 38 |
| 17 |  Немає тексту... | 27 |
| 18 | Breaking: A March Across America—the Rise of Cultural Marxism in the United States.
Societal collapse is never a singular event. It is a process.
I have been warning the American people for many years now about the deliberate implementation of socialist governance structures within our federal and municipal systems. This trajectory began with explicit statements made by Barack Obama in 2008, when he promised to fundamentally transform the nation.
I took those statements seriously because I understood the ideological commitment behind them.
For over a decade, I have documented and articulated how this transformation was being executed through the administrative state, the education apparatus, and the cultural institutions.
The strategy has been consistent: use the machinery of government to reshape American society according to principles fundamentally at odds with the constitutional order and individual liberty.
What we are witnessing in New York City today is the predictable result of this long-term campaign. The collapse of public safety, the erasure of law enforcement accountability, the systematic release of criminal offenders back into American communities, and the open abandonment of border security are not discrete failures. They are the intentional and direct consequences of socialist ideology embedded in policy.
Democratic leadership in that city has made deliberate choices to deemphasize enforcement, to prioritize ideology over order, and to subordinate the safety of American citizens to the demands of progressive governance.
The American people now see what I have been saying for over a decade. The question that remains is whether we possess the will to reverse course through lawful, constitutional means. That begins with local action and restored accountability. | 29 |
| 19 | It’s becoming harder and harder to deny, that what we have been witnessing, is a hostile Communist takeover.
Communism infiltrated the US, under the guise of “Liberalism” and “Progress”.
The Dems have been Communist this whole time, but their masks have slipped off. They are merely revealing what they have been all along, wolves in sheep’s clothing. Their ideology is poison, designed to subvert and destroy the United States from within.
They are not interested in the rule of law or the prosperity of the American People. They are interested in global domination, and We are standing in their way. | 31 |
| 20 | Trump is now pressuring the Senate GOP to pass the SAVE America Act. This tells me that we are getting close.
It’s time for the Senate GOP to put up or shut up. Either they deliver for the American People now, or Trump will be forced to explore the “Executive option”.
It doesn’t really matter to me. I know that one way or the other, the 2026 election will be secure, because it’s a matter of National Security, as we are under assault from within via a corrupt conspiracy/insurrection who wish to overthrow the United States of America, and POTUS confirmed he is willing to handle it himself if has to.
It would be much better optically for the Senate GOP to pass this into law and for Trump to not have to do it the Executive way, but I’m at the point where I don’t give a rat’s ass. Trump is going to save this nation, whether anyone likes it or not, and anyone who thinks he does not have the power or authority to do so, is mistaken. | 37 |
