IBC Laws
Відкрити в Telegram
All about Default, Dispute and Debt Resolution Visit www.ibclaw.in
Показати більше2 452
Підписники
-224 години
-37 днів
-1530 днів
Триває завантаження даних...
Схожі канали
Хмара тегів
Вхідні та вихідні згадування
---
---
---
---
---
---
Залучення підписників
вересень '26
вересень '26
+1
в 0 каналах
серпень '26
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '26
+9
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '26
+8
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '26
+9
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '26
+12
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '26
+7
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '26
+8
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
січень '26
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '25
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '25
+19
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '25
+27
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '25
+27
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '25
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '25
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '25
+27
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '25
+24
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '25
+16
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '25
+13
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '25
+21
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
січень '25
+22
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '24
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '24
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '24
+14
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '24
+53
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '24
+83
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '24
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '24
+37
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '24
+44
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '24
+59
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '24
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '24
+28
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
січень '24
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '23
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '23
+33
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '23
+29
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '23
+35
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '23
+33
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '23
+46
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '23
+41
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '23
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '23
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '23
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '23
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
січень '23
+31
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '22
+39
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '22
+24
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '22
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '22
+39
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '22
+55
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '22
+47
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '22
+48
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '22
+51
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '22
+67
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '22
+75
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '22
+76
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
січень '22
+68
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '21
+59
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '21
+71
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '21
+575
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '21
+67
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '21
+73
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '21
+46
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '21
+131
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '21
+53
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '21
+51
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '21
+1 701
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 02 вересня | 0 | |||
| 01 вересня | +1 |
Дописи каналу
High Court-Bombay:
Whether, in an admiralty arrest situation involving a vessel carrying highly inflammable LPG cargo and posing an imminent environmental and safety risk, the Court can permit discharge of the cargo and movement of the arrested vessel under safeguards while continuing the arrest of the vessel?
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Appeal against order passed on Port’s application concerning arrested vessel carrying 1880.260 MT of LPG and posing apprehended environmental and safety disaster – issue was whether cargo could be discharged and vessel moved despite continuance of arrest. Held that the Court, on material including the Director General of Shipping’s inspection noting non-operational cooling pump, sprinkler and firefighting systems, inert gas system and expired P&I cover,...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4689 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/blue-sea-marine-inc-vs-jhang-union-international-llc-fc-fz-bombay-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/
| 2 | High Court-Bombay:
Whether, in a Section 11 application, the Court can refuse appointment of an arbitrator by finally deciding that a restricted insurance arbitration clause excludes disputes where liability has been repudiated?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 7, 11, 16 and 21 – Section 11 application for appointment of arbitrator under an insurance policy containing a restricted clause providing for arbitration only if the dispute was as to quantum and liability was otherwise admitted – respondent resisted appointment relying on repudiation of liability, accord and satisfaction, election and limitation. Held that while earlier authorities on insurance clauses recognised that disputes...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4537 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/samraj-gold-exports-pvt-ltd-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-bombay-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 12 |
| 3 | High Court-Calcutta:
Whether an arbitral tribunal can, in the interest of justice under Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, require filing of chief affidavits of all proposed witnesses before cross-examination and reconsider introduction of additional documents through a substituted witness's affidavit of evidence?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 19, 5, 34, 37; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XVIII Rule 4(1A), 4(1B), 4(1C); Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Sections 10, 16 – challenge to procedural order of arbitrator rejecting objection to introduction of new documents through substituted witness’s affidavit of evidence and refusing insistence on simultaneous filing of all witness affidavits. Held that though an arbitral tribunal is not bound...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4553 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/kolkata-municipal-corporation-vs-bengal-shelter-housing-development-ltd-calcutta-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 8 |
| 4 | High Court-Madhya Pradesh:
Whether, at the Section 11 stage under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the High Court can decide if a claim falls within an 'Excepted Matter' under Clause 43(2) of the GCC or whether that objection must be left to the arbitral tribunal?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 11, 11(6-A), 11(8) and 16 – Application for appointment of arbitrator – respondents opposed reference on the ground that under Clause 43(2) of the GCC, signing of no claim certificate was an Excepted Matter and therefore the dispute was not arbitrable. Held that at the Section 11 stage the Court is confined to examining the existence of the arbitration agreement and cannot undertake an...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4683 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/girrajji-creative-jv-vs-union-of-india-and-ors-madhya-pradesh-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 7 |
| 5 | High Court-Delhi:
Whether, after the 2015 amendment to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a court can refer only the arbitrable prayers in a suit to arbitration under GCC clauses confining contractor claims to notified claims while leaving non-arbitrable and non-notified claims to be pursued in the suit?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 8(1), Section 16 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order II Rule 3, Order II Rule 6 – Two commercial suits arising from IOCL contracts contained GCC clauses under which only notified claims of the contractor included in the final bill were arbitrable, while owner’s claims against the contractor were also referable. The contractor opposed reference contending that its claims were non-notified,...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4218 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/corrtech-energy-ltd-vs-indian-oil-corporation-ltd-and-anr-delhi-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 7 |
| 6 | REAT-Uttar Pradesh(UP):
Whether delay of 1084 days in filing an appeal by a government agency can be condoned when the only explanation is time taken for internal approvals and departmental procedure?
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Section 43(5) – delay condonation – appeal filed 1084 days late by appellant promoter, a government agency – explanation founded only on time consumed in obtaining internal departmental approvals after receipt of the order and certified copy. Held that the application was bereft of sufficient cause and disclosed no reason except administrative processing for approval to file the appeal; the Tribunal found the...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 400 REAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/yamuna-expressway-industrial-development-authority-vs-pankaj-kumar-uttar-pradesh-reat/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 7 |
| 7 | REAT-Karnataka:
Whether compensation for shortfall in carpet area could be awarded under the Karnataka RERA notification and model agreement despite a prior contractual clause permitting +/- 5% deviation, and whether the Adjudicating Officer was justified in relying on the inspection report and carpet-area rate for quantification?
Notification No. DOH 8 RERA 2017 dated 12.06.2020 – Rule 8A – Model Agreement for Sale – Clause 1.7; Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 – Section 44(4) – Appeal against award of compensation for shortfall in carpet area. The promoter contended that the agreements and sale deed permitted +/- 5% deviation, that the 2020 notification could not override the contract, that actual deviation was only 1.62 sq. ft.,...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 477 REAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/godrej-home-constructions-pvt-ltd-vs-vijay-monterio-and-ors-karnataka-reat/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 6 |
| 8 | REAT-Karnataka:
Whether the Authority could direct registration of an Agreement for Sale under Section 13 of the RERA Act when the agreement had become time-barred for registration under Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908, and the promoter was ready to execute the sale deed?
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Sections 13(1), 31; Registration Act, 1908, Sections 17(2)(v), 23; Transfer of Property Act, Sections 53A, 54 – appeal against direction of Authority requiring promoter to execute and register Agreement for Sale within 30 days – promoter contended that the agreement executed in 2022-23 had become time-barred for registration under Section 23 of the Registration Act and that sale deed was ready for execution....
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 476 REAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/sobha-ltd-vs-karnataka-real-estate-regulatory-authority-and-ors-karnataka-reat-9/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 6 |
| 9 | REAT-Karnataka:
Whether the Authority could direct registration of an Agreement to Sell under Section 13 of the RERA Act when the agreement was presented beyond the period prescribed under Section 23 of the Registration Act and the allottee had paid less than 10% of the apartment cost?
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Sections 13 and 31; Registration Act, 1908, Sections 17(2)(v) and 23; Transfer of Property Act, Sections 53A and 54 – challenge to Authority’s direction requiring promoter to execute and register an Agreement for Sale within 30 days. Held that though Section 13(1) of the RERA Act contemplates registration of the Agreement for Sale under the law for the time being in force, such...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 475 REAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/sobha-ltd-vs-karnataka-real-estate-regulatory-authority-and-ors-karnataka-reat-10/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 6 |
| 10 | REAT-Odisha:
b
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 – Sections 3, 11(4)(e), 17; Odisha Development Authorities Act, 1982 – Section 20; Government of Odisha, Housing and Urban Development Department Notification No. 4844 dated 15.2.2020 – issue was whether the promoter could rely on an earlier tribunal order and on sale deeds, architect’s completion certificate and BDO-issued occupancy certificate to contend that the rural project stood completed before commencement of the RERA...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 445 REAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/reeta-structurals-pvt-ltd-and-ors-vs-alok-kumar-mohanty-and-anr-odisha-reat/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 5 |
| 11 | DRT-Ernakulam:
Whether an application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act can validly be filed by the authorised officer of an asset reconstruction company, and whether a typographical error in the affidavit regarding the outstanding dues vitiates the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order for taking possession?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Ss. 5, 5(4), 13(12), 14, 17(1); Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, R. 2(a) – Challenge to S.14 proceedings on grounds that application before CJM was not filed by secured creditor and that affidavit wrongly mentioned outstanding dues. Held that after assignment of the loans, the asset reconstruction company acquired the right under S.5(4) to continue and enforce...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 676 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/s-r-educational-and-charitable-trust-and-ors-vs-asset-reconstruction-company-india-ltd-drt-ernakulam/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 10 |
| 12 | DRT-Chennai:
Whether a Securitisation Application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act can be treated as within limitation from the applicant’s alleged date of knowledge of the auction sale instead of from the date on which the impugned measure was taken?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 13(4) and 17(1) – challenge to e-auction sale notice and consequential sale by legal heir of deceased mortgagor – applicant contended that limitation should run from 11.12.2023, the alleged date of knowledge of sale, as she was neither borrower nor guarantor and had not been served with sale notice. Held that Section 17(1) requires an...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 675 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/vasantha-v-vs-punjab-national-bank-drt-chennai/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 7 |
| 13 | DRAT-Kolkata:
Whether the DRT could dismiss the transferred application on the ground that no petition was pending when a restoration application against the earlier dismissal in default was already on record, and whether the appeal was maintainable on the affidavit as filed?
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5; Notaries Act, 1952, Section 8(1)(e) – DRT dismissed the transferred application on 02.12.2019 stating that no petition was pending, though the earlier dismissal in default dated 17.06.2013 had already been followed by a restoration application. Objection was also raised to the maintainability of the appeal on the ground of defective affidavit. Held that the record showed that the restoration application had in fact been filed...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 342 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/kotak-mahindra-bank-ltd-vs-aluminium-manufacturing-company-ltd-and-ors-drat-kolkata/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 3 |
| 14 | DRAT-Delhi:
Whether defendants proceeded ex parte in a DRT original application can be permitted to file a written statement beyond 45 days on the plea of deficient service and pending settlement negotiations?
Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 – service of notice, ex parte proceedings, filing of Written Statement. The issue was whether the appellants, against whom the DRT had closed the right to file Written Statement and proceeded ex parte, could seek recall of that order and have a Written Statement dated 29.08.2025 taken on record on the ground of improper service, illegible papers and ongoing settlement talks. Held that...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 347 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/dreamweaver-realtors-pvt-ltd-and-ors-vs-idbi-trusteeship-services-ltd-and-anr-drat-delhi/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 5 |
| 15 | DRT-Mumbai:
Whether SARFAESI measures can be challenged on the grounds that a co-owner spouse was not a borrower or guarantor, that further charge documents were unregistered, that Section 13(2) notice and Section 13(3A) compliance were defective, and that absence of prior CERSAI registration invalidated enforcement?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 14 and 26D; Registration Act, Section 17 – challenge to SARFAESI action on grounds that applicant No. 2 was not borrower/guarantor, further charge deeds were unregistered, notice and Section 13(3A) compliance were defective, Section 14 proceedings were bad, and prior CERSAI registration was absent. Held that the bank records showed applicant No. 2...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 661 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/aleixo-arnolfo-pereira-and-anr-vs-goa-state-co-operative-bank-ltd-drt-mumbai/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 6 |
| 16 | DRAT-Kolkata:
Whether a bank can retain security documents after receipt of the admitted dues and costs merely because the borrower’s counterclaim remains pending under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993?
Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Sections 19(6), 19(7), 19(9); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 6A and Order XXIII – issue was whether the bank could continue to retain security documents after the borrower paid the admitted outstanding dues and costs, merely because a counterclaim remained pending. Held that the defendants had filed a counterclaim and not a set-off; a counterclaim is treated as a plaint...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 329 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/hdfc-bank-ltd-vs-vka-constructions-and-ors-drat-kolkata/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 5 |
| 17 | DRT-Madurai:
Whether non-compliance with Rules 8(1) and 8(2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 in taking symbolic possession under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act vitiates the subsequent order under Section 14 for taking physical possession?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 13(4), 14, 17(1); Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rules 8(1) and 8(2) – challenge to Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order appointing Advocate Commissioner for taking physical possession of mortgaged property. Held that though the applicant had availed the housing loan, created equitable mortgage and was in default, the respondent finance company failed to prove mandatory compliance...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 685 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/karuppaye-p-vs-jm-financial-home-loans-ltd-drt-madurai/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 4 |
| 18 | DRT-Bengaluru:
Whether non-compliance with Rule 3 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 in serving the demand notice vitiates the subsequent possession notice and SARFAESI measures?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 13(4), 17; Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rules 3, 8(1), 8(2) – challenge to possession notice on the ground of non-service of demand notice and non-compliance with statutory procedure. Held that while the applicant admitted the loan, mortgage and default, and failed to prove its plea of substantial repayments, the respondent-bank, though producing the demand...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 690 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/bharatiya-rural-development-foundation-vs-authorised-officer-canara-bank-drt-bengaluru/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 3 |
| 19 | DRT-Madurai:
Whether a Sale Certificate issued in a SARFAESI private treaty sale can be sustained when the secured creditor fails to prove compliance with the mandatory possession and sale procedure and the valuation of the secured asset is materially defective?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 13(4), 14 and 17(1); Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rules 8(1), 8(2), 8(5) and 8(6) – Challenge to sale certificate issued in private treaty sale – maintainability of examining antecedent SARFAESI measures – defective possession notices and valuation irregularities. Held that while considering the validity of a sale certificate under Section 17, the Tribunal is...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 698 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/swasthikhas-jewellers-and-ors-vs-tata-capital-financial-services-ltd-and-anr-drt-madurai/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 5 |
| 20 | NCLT-Bengaluru Bench:
Whether a shareholder-cum-contributory of a company struck off under Section 248(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 can maintain a winding-up petition under Sections 271 and 272 on the basis of prima facie proof of locus standi despite non-reflection of later share transfers in the Registrar’s records?
Companies Act, 2013 – Sections 248(5), 248(8), 250, 271, 272(1)(c), 273(1) – Petition for winding up of a struck off company – objection to maintainability on ground that petitioner lacked locus standi as shareholder/contributory. Held that Section 248(8) expressly preserves the Tribunal’s power to wind up a company notwithstanding striking off under Section 248(5), and therefore striking off by itself did not render the petition non-maintainable. The petitioner had placed...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3100 NCLT
Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Aggarwal (Judicial Member) and Shri Radhakrishna Sreepada (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/ramkumar-bansal-vs-registrar-of-companies-bengaluru-nclt-bengaluru-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 11 |
