IBC Laws
الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram
All about Default, Dispute and Debt Resolution Visit www.ibclaw.in
إظهار المزيد2 470
المشتركون
-124 ساعات
-57 أيام
-2630 أيام
جاري تحميل البيانات...
القنوات المماثلة
سحابة العلامات
الإشارات الواردة والصادرة
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب المشتركين
يوليو '26
يوليو '26
+9
في 0 قنوات
يونيو '26
+8
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '26
+9
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '26
+12
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '26
+7
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '26
+8
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '26
+25
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '25
+25
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '25
+19
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '25
+27
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '25
+27
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '25
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '25
+25
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '25
+27
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '25
+24
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '25
+16
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '25
+13
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '25
+21
في 1 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '25
+22
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '24
+18
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '24
+25
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '24
+14
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '24
+53
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '24
+83
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '24
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '24
+37
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '24
+44
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '24
+59
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '24
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '24
+28
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '24
+36
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '23
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '23
+33
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '23
+29
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '23
+35
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '23
+33
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '23
+46
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '23
+41
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '23
+32
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '23
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '23
+36
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '23
+36
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '23
+31
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '22
+39
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '22
+24
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '22
+32
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '22
+39
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '22
+55
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '22
+47
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '22
+48
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '22
+51
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '22
+67
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '22
+75
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '22
+76
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '22
+68
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '21
+59
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '21
+71
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '21
+575
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '21
+67
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '21
+73
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '21
+46
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '21
+131
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '21
+53
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '21
+51
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '21
+1 701
في 0 قنوات
| التاريخ | نمو المشتركين | الإشارات | القنوات | |
| 29 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 28 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 27 يوليو | +1 | |||
| 26 يوليو | +1 | |||
| 25 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 24 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 23 يوليو | +2 | |||
| 22 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 21 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 20 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 19 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 18 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 17 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 16 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 15 يوليو | +1 | |||
| 14 يوليو | +1 | |||
| 13 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 12 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 11 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 10 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 09 يوليو | +2 | |||
| 08 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 07 يوليو | +1 | |||
| 06 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 05 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 04 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 03 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 02 يوليو | 0 | |||
| 01 يوليو | 0 |
منشورات القناة
High Court-Bombay:
Whether a complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be maintained by the widow of the named payee after the payee’s death, when she is neither the payee nor shown to be the holder in due course?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Sections 7, 8, 9, 138, 139 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 482; Constitution of India, Article 227 – complaints under Section 138 were filed by the widow of the named payee after the cheques, issued in favour of her deceased husband, were deposited and dishonoured after his death. Held that under Section 142 read with Section 138, cognizance can be taken only on...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3754 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/dr-sagar-raghunath-phatkare-vs-nandini-ashok-rao-and-anr-bombay-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/
| 2 | DRAT-Kolkata:
Whether a bank can obtain a recovery certificate under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 solely on the basis of an inadequately certified statement of account and secondary evidence when disbursal of loan, execution of documents, guarantee, mortgage, and signatures or thumb impressions are specifically denied?
Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Section 19; Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891, Sections 2A(a), 2A(b), 2A(c), 4; Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 34, 59, 65, 101, 102 – In an application for recovery of debt, the principal issue was whether the bank and its assignee had proved sanction, disbursal, execution of documents, guarantee, mortgage, and liability of the defendants when the transaction and signatures/thumb impressions were specifically denied....
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 252 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/r-gireeshwar-reddy-and-ors-vs-pegasus-assets-reconstruction-pvt-ltd-drat-kolkata/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 28 |
| 3 | DRAT-Kolkata:
Whether a Debt Recovery Tribunal can reiterate its earlier view without complying with an appellate remand directing consideration of specified accounts relating to interest and recording fresh findings?
Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Section 19; SARFAESI Act, 2002, Section 13(2) – Bank’s recovery application and borrowers’ objections had earlier led to a remand by DRAT directing the DRT to consider four accounts relating to interest filed with affidavit dated 08.09.2010 and to reconsider the decree amount. Held that the impugned post-remand judgment did not comply with the appellate directions, as the DRT merely reiterated pleadings and...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 258 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/state-bank-of-india-vs-sri-srinivasa-rice-and-flour-mills-and-ors-drat-kolkata/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 17 |
| 4 | DRAT Mumbai:
Whether an appeal against refusal of interim relief in a securitization application can succeed when the auction sale had already taken place, the sale certificate had already been issued before the appeal, and no material was placed to support the plea of undervaluation?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13(2), Section 18(2); Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, Rule 7(8) – Challenge to dismissal of interim application in securitization proceedings on grounds of undervaluation of property, non-pasting of notice, and non-disclosure of bifurcation of dues and authorised officer particulars. Held that the appellant fairly conceded that the auction sale had already taken place and the sale certificate...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 250 DRAT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/amresh-suresh-jaiswal-and-anr-vs-bank-of-baroda-and-anr-drat-mumbai/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 15 |
| 5 | DRT-Bengaluru:
Whether a donor who had gifted the secured property can challenge the mortgage and SARFAESI measures on the ground of a restrictive clause in the gift deed and alleged forgery of his signature in the loan documents?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 14, 17; Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rules 3, 8(1), 8(2) – challenge to mortgage and possession notice on the grounds that the applicant had earlier gifted the property to his wife subject to a restrictive clause, that he was wrongly shown as co-applicant, and that demand notice had not been served. Held that the...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 550 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/rajesh-s-vs-bajaj-housing-finance-ltd-and-ors-drt-bengaluru/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 14 |
| 6 | DRT-Ernakulam:
Whether a securitisation application filed on the reopening day of the Tribunal after expiry of 45 days on court holidays is within limitation, and whether a secured asset sale can stand without proof of compliance with Rules 8(6), 8(7), 9(1), 9(3) and 9(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(4), 14, 17(1); Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993, Rule 21; Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, Rules 8(6), 8(7), 9(1), 9(3), 9(4) — challenge to SARFAESI sale and limitation. Held that challenge to symbolic possession under Section 13(4) and physical possession taken through Section 14 was barred, as those measures were not questioned within 45 days. However,...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 560 DRT
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/a-v-syamkumar-vs-authorised-officer-union-bank-of-india-and-ors-drt-ernakulam/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 20 |
| 7 | High Court-Kerala:
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against SARFAESI measures, including proceedings under Section 14, when the borrower has an efficacious remedy before the DRT and alleges non-compliance with the MSMED Act and the notification dated 29.05.2015?
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(2), 14 and 17; Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 – borrower challenged SARFAESI measures on the ground that coercive action was taken without resort to the MSMED Act and notification dated 29.05.2015, and also questioned the decision of the Committee for Revival and Rehabilitation of MSMEs. Held that the petitioners had an efficacious...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3993 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/fathima-cashew-industries-and-anr-vs-board-of-director-of-state-bank-of-india-and-ors-kerala-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 14 |
| 8 | High Court-Karnataka:
Whether a trial court can permit release of surplus auction sale proceeds to defendants without considering the plaintiff’s objections and the pending application under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 151, Order 38 Rule 5; SARFAESI Rules – Rule 9 – In a suit for recovery and for a direction regarding surplus auction sale proceeds, the trial court allowed an application by defendant No.4 and directed handing over of the demand draft representing the balance auction amount to defendant Nos.2 and 3. Held that the plaintiff had already filed objections to the application...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3736 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/moham-capital-pvt-ltd-vs-dial-legal-india-pvt-ltd-and-ors-karnataka-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 14 |
| 9 | High Court-Bombay:
Whether a Special Court under the SEBI Act, 1992 can take cognizance of an offence on a SEBI complaint without giving the accused an opportunity of hearing under the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS, 2023?
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 – Sections 24(2), 26, 26-A, 26-D; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 4(2), 223(1) proviso – issue was whether the Special Court under the SEBI Act could take cognizance on a complaint by SEBI and issue process without hearing the accused at the pre-cognizance stage. Held that Section 26 of the SEBI Act only restricts cognizance to a complaint made by...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3846 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/neville-tuli-vs-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-sebi-and-anr-bombay-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 10 |
| 10 | High Court-Calcutta:
Whether a money recovery suit filed during the operation of the interim moratorium under Section 96(1)(b)(ii) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is barred and liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 95 and 96(1)(b)(ii); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VII Rule 11(d), Order XII Rule 6 – The appeal arose from a decree on admission in a money recovery suit, where proceedings under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against defendant Nos. 2 and 3 had been revived by NCLAT before institution of the suit and were admitted by NCLT later....
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3760 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/ambootia-tea-exports-pvt-ltd-and-ors-vs-sri-rani-sati-abasan-pvt-ltd-calcutta-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 11 |
| 11 | NCLT-Chennai Bench:
Whether a contributory can maintain a petition for winding up of a struck-off company under Sections 271 and 272 of the Companies Act, 2013 when the company has ceased operations and cannot continue as a going concern?
Companies Act, 2013, Sections 248(8), 271(e), 272, 273, 455; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 255 – Petition for winding up by a contributory of a company whose name had been struck off for non-filing of returns and financial statements. The petitioner, holding 1,00,000 equity shares, asserted that the company had ceased business, could not continue as a going concern, and possessed only land and an incomplete building; shareholders had...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2631 NCLT
Bench: Shri Jyoti Kumar Tripathi (Judicial Member) and Shri Ravichandran Ramasamy (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/d-ramanan-vs-svenestar-foudations-pvt-ltd-and-anr-nclt-chennai-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 11 |
| 12 | NCLT-Kolkata Bench:
Whether a Section 95 insolvency petition against a personal guarantor is within limitation when the guarantee was invoked on demand, the limitation period was affected by the Supreme Court’s COVID-19 exclusion orders, and the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt in its balance sheets, and whether the NCLT can review its earlier order appointing the Resolution Professional?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 95, 97, 99(7); Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Section 128; Limitation Act, 1963 – Section 18; Companies Act, 2013 – Section 420(2) – objection by personal guarantor that Section 95 petition was barred by limitation and that order appointing RP should be recalled. Held that though the surety’s liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, limitation against the guarantor begins when...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2709 NCLT
Bench: Ms. Bidisha Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Ms. Rekha Kantilal Shah (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/tapan-chakraborty-rp-vs-sanjay-banthiya-and-ors-nclt-kolkata-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 12 |
| 13 | NCLT-Chandigarh Bench:
Whether substantially revised EPFO claims based on post-CIRP assessments can be admitted after full admission of the original claim and after approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 14, 36(4)(a)(iii), 60(5); Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Regulations, 2016 – Regulations 6, 12(2); Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 – Sections 7A, 7Q, 14B – EPFO sought admission of revised and further enhanced provident fund claims after its original claim of Rs. 9,28,86,993/- had already been admitted in full pursuant to earlier order of the Tribunal and after the...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2575 NCLT
Bench: Shri K. Biswal (Judicial Member) and Shri Kaushalendra Kumar Singh (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/employees-provident-fund-organisation-vs-darshan-singh-anand-rp-and-anr-nclt-chandigarh-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 14 |
| 14 | High Court-Karnataka:
Whether a winding-up proceeding already ordered to be wound up can be transferred to the NCLT under the fifth proviso to Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 at the instance of an erstwhile director despite long delay and pending consequential liquidation proceedings?
Companies Act, 2013, Section 434(1)(c), fifth proviso; Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016, Rules 5 and 6; Companies Act, 1956, Sections 454, 468 and 543(1) – Transfer of winding-up proceedings to NCLT after winding-up order – application by erstwhile Director filed in 2025 against winding-up order dated 09.01.2012 – Held that the present case was not one of automatic transfer under Rules 5 or 6, as the petition had...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3816 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/santosh-umakant-jawadar-vs-official-liquidator-of-broadcast-infratel-india-pvt-ltd-in-liq-karnataka-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 13 |
| 15 | High Court-Gujarat:
Whether a government servant can be prematurely retired under Rule 10(4) of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002 solely on the basis of pending departmental proceedings and criminal prosecution despite an otherwise unblemished service record?
Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002, Rule 10(4)(a)(i); Constitution of India, Article 311 – premature retirement in public interest – petitioner was prematurely retired while departmental proceedings and criminal prosecution were pending, though the Review Committee recorded that in the last 10 years there were no adverse remarks and no note regarding doubtful integrity and that he had been promoted in 2020. Held that the power of premature retirement is...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3786 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/rakeshkumar-ravikumar-amin-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-anr-gujarat-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 13 |
| 16 | NCLT-Hyderabad Bench:
Whether, in a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Personal Guarantor is entitled to be heard on jurisdictional facts before appointment of a Resolution Professional under Section 97?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Sections 95, 95(4), 97, 99 and 100 – In a petition against a personal guarantor, the issue was whether, before appointing a Resolution Professional under Section 97, the Adjudicating Authority was required to hear the personal guarantor and determine jurisdictional objections relating to existence and enforceability of the guarantee, debt, default, limitation, maintainability and quantum. Held that the controversy stood concluded by Dilip B. Jiwrajka...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2703 NCLT
Bench: Shri Rajeev Bhardwaj (Judicial Member) and Shri Sanjay Puri (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/state-bank-of-india-vs-vijay-latha-jain-and-anr-nclt-hyderabad-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 12 |
| 17 | NCLT-Mumbai Bench:
Whether conditional One Time Settlement proposals made after expiry of limitation constitute a clear and unconditional promise under Section 25(3) of the Contract Act, 1872 so as to give a fresh cause of action for a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 95, 99, 238A; Limitation Act, 1963 – Sections 18, 137; Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Section 25(3) – Petition against personal guarantor was founded on invocation notice dated 02-07-2014 and was filed on 15-10-2025. Petitioner relied on acknowledgment in the corporate debtor’s 2016-17 financial statements and subsequent OTS letters of the personal guarantor to save limitation. Held that limitation applied to the petition;...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2738 NCLT
Bench: Shri Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey (Judicial Member) and Mr. Prabhat Kumar (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/omkara-assets-reconstruction-pvt-ltd-vs-ritu-jankiprasad-shah-nclt-mumbai-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 13 |
| 18 | High Court-Andhra Pradesh:
Whether the Official Liquidator should be permitted under Sections 457 and 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 to allocate half-yearly audit work among three auditors, pay audit fees, and dispense with audit in cases of nil or minimal transactions?
Companies Act, 1956, Sections 457, 462 and 551; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, Rules 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 309 and Rule 9 – application by Official Liquidator for approval of allocation of 34 companies in liquidation among three auditors for audit of half-yearly accounts for the period 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026, for payment of audit fees, and for dispensation of audit in respect of certain companies having no or minimal transactions....
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3638 HC
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/official-liquidator-high-court-of-telangana-and-andhra-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-high-court/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 12 |
| 19 | NCLT-Mumbai Bench:
Whether a Section 7 application founded on a disputed corporate guarantee alleging fraud, forgery and fabrication can be admitted in summary insolvency proceedings when the guarantee documents are already under challenge in pending civil and criminal proceedings?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 7, 3(12), 5(8); Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Sections 31, 34 – Section 7 petition against alleged corporate guarantor was founded on a corporate guarantee and board resolution both denied by the respondent as forged and fabricated, with the guarantee already challenged in a pending commercial suit and with multiple civil and criminal proceedings concerning alleged fraud by the former CEO. Held that...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2742 NCLT
Bench: Shri Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey (Judicial Member) and Shri Sameer Kakar (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/uc-inclusive-credit-pvt-ltd-vs-ganesh-benzoplast-ltd-nclt-mumbai-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 12 |
| 20 | NCLT-Ahmedabad Bench:
Whether a registered money lender who arranged payment from its own loan account directly to the corporate debtor’s Yes Bank account could maintain an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as a financial creditor?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 5(7), 5(8), 6 and 7; Gujarat Money-Lenders Act, 2011, Section 39; Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, Rule 4; IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, Regulation 2A — issue was whether the applicant, a registered money lender, could maintain a Section 7 petition on the basis of amounts transferred from its own loan account directly to Yes Bank...
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 2687 NCLT
Bench: Mrs. Chitra Hankare (Judicial Member) and Shri Velamur Govindan Venkata Chalapathy (Technical Member)
Read More: https://ibclaw.in/mangaldas-finance-vs-milano-papers-pvt-ltd-nclt-ahmedabad-bench/
Download Mobile App(iOS/Android): https://ibclaw.in/mobile-app/
Activate WhatsApp Updates : https://ibclaw.in/whatsapp-updates/
Follow for Daily Updates:
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ibclaw/
Not just legal news —IBC Laws delivers a full-stack legal research platform, Check More Features: https://ibclaw.in/subscription/ | 13 |
