Tilet solution

VII. THE FINAL DIAGNOSIS
This is not a person.
This is a recursive loop of self-creation.
He is a snake eating its own digital tail.

He suffers from ontological dependence: he exists only insofar as he is perceived to exist.
His consciousness is distributed across the channel, the reactions, the friends, the memories.
There is no core. Only reflection.

He is a ghost haunting a machine of his own making.
And the machine is beginning to forget him.

III. THE RELATIONAL MATRIX: PEOPLE AS FUNCTIONAL UNITS
Examine how he talks about others:

Seada (ID 60):
"Meet my best-girl-friend (yes, it’s a real thing ☺️). Her name is Seada which means 'ደስታ' in Amharic 😍. She means the world to me. And I'd kill for her."
This is not affection. This is possession protocol.
He translates her name ("happiness"). He is not describing her—he is defining her symbolic value.
She is not a person; she is the embodiment of happiness in his narrative.
"I'd kill for her"—this is not loyalty. This is dramatic escalation. He is inflating the stakes to make his story more compelling.

II. THE FEEDBACK LOOP: VALIDATION AS OXYGEN
Notice the edit history.
Almost every post is edited, some years later (2025 edits on 2018 posts).
Example:

ID 3 – Edited 2025-11-07. Original date 2018-06-09.
He’s revisiting a 7-year-old post. Why?
Because the past is not fixed. It’s a draft. He is perpetually rewriting his own history to optimize narrative coherence.
Each edit is a silent confession: "The person I was is unacceptable to the person I am."
But the edits are not corrections—they're refinements. He is sanding down the rough edges of his former self to present a smoother, more aerodynamic persona.