Basira Press
Islamic pro-resistance research and analysis of both material & metaphysical issues facing our world. BasiraPress.org Donate: https://basirapress.org/donate/ Buy our book: https://basirapress.org/shop/books/firmest-handle-book/
Больше📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала Basira Press
Канал Basira Press (@basirapress) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 10 641 подписчиков, занимая 8 768 место в категории Религия и духовность и 3 444 место в регионе США.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 10 641 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 21 июня, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило 47, а за последние 24 часа — 57, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 4.57%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 3.25% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 485 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 345 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 17.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как enemy, authority, resistance, iran, shiite.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“Islamic pro-resistance research and analysis of both material & metaphysical issues facing our world.
BasiraPress.org
Donate: https://basirapress.org/donate/
Buy our book: https://basirapress.org/shop/books/firmest-handle-book/”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 22 июня, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Религия и духовность.
Загрузка данных...
| Дата | Привлечение подписчиков | Упоминания | Каналы | |
| 22 июня | +23 | |||
| 21 июня | +60 | |||
| 20 июня | +29 | |||
| 19 июня | +3 | |||
| 18 июня | +4 | |||
| 17 июня | +1 | |||
| 16 июня | +2 | |||
| 15 июня | +6 | |||
| 14 июня | +5 | |||
| 13 июня | +8 | |||
| 12 июня | +14 | |||
| 11 июня | +1 | |||
| 10 июня | +4 | |||
| 09 июня | +1 | |||
| 08 июня | +4 | |||
| 07 июня | +7 | |||
| 06 июня | +7 | |||
| 05 июня | +4 | |||
| 04 июня | +5 | |||
| 03 июня | +3 | |||
| 02 июня | 0 | |||
| 01 июня | +1 |
| 2 | 🇵🇸🇮🇷 Did Iran abandon Palestine?
Once in a lifetime debate is reposted on YouTube with a better quality. Do check it out and make sure share it as much as possible!
WATCH NOW 👈 | 250 |
| 3 | — 🇮🇷/🇨🇭/🇱🇧 NEW: The Iranian delegation is leaving Switzerland
The main progress that has been achieved: Israel has been forced to agree that it will partially withdraw from areas in Lebanon and hand them over to the Lebanese Army.
@Middle_East_Spectator | 169 |
| 4 | 🇬🇧BREAKING: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has resigned.
⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN | 198 |
| 5 | — 🇮🇷 NEW: The Strategic Deputy of President Pezeshkian has issued an order that nightly pro-Islamic Republic rallies should end after Ayatollah Khamenei’s burial ceremony in July, because they ‘threaten national cohesion’
The reason? Very predictable. They know the Iranian population is against the current negotiations.
In the statement of the Strategic Deputy, it explicitly says:
‘The gatherings could change the field dynamics towards creating blockages in the path of diplomacy.’
‘Some of these gatherings have turned into a lever to put pressure on the official structure (i.e. the government and negotiators)…posting a serious obstacle to making strategic and expedient decisions at critical moments.’
In other words, they want to use the people to protect the system during war time, but they don’t want those same people to be on the streets and freely expressing their critical opinion against the Pezeshkian / Qalibaf / Araqchi negotiations.
@Middle_East_Spectator | 177 |
| 6 | ✴️ Highlights from the speech of Hezbollah Secretary-General His Eminence Sheikh Naim Qassem at the Central Ashura Council:
– A ceasefire that grants “Israel” freedom of action is a continuation of the aggression, and we will not accept it.
– We did not accept this proposal throughout the fifteen-month period, nor after the 27 November agreement.
– Every time we adhered to the ceasefire, the enemy failed to do so.
– We are in the phase of breaking the “Israeli” project, and a ceasefire means a complete halt to the aggression, paving the way for the enemy’s withdrawal from our land.
– A ceasefire means a complete cessation of the aggression by air, land, and sea, an end to demolition operations, and no reinforcement, consolidation, or continued presence in the occupied areas.
Via Hezbollah Military Media Official Channel (which has some restrictions on Telegram in certain countries) | 444 |
| 7 | 🌐 Global Voice Network
A unified network of Telegram channels delivering reliable updates from across the world — all in one place.
🛰What you’ll find:
🔴Real-time global updates as events unfold
🔴In-depth coverage of geopolitical developments
🔴Thoughtful analysis on political and military affairs
🔴Content available in multiple languages for a wider reach
📊 Built on coordination, verification, and shared effort — bringing together voices from different regions into one structured network.
📢Stay ahead, stay aware, stay connected globally:
Join here | 462 |
| 8 | It was the IRGC and Iranian Navy closing the Strait of Hormuz as retaliation for aggression and war crimes in Lebanon, in violation of the MoU, who enforced the MoU.
The Zionists did not back down due to the smiles or English speaking abilities of diplomats. They backed down due to the threat of military retaliation. | 447 |
| 9 | 🔴 We are live: JOIN HERE 👈
Has Iran Left Gaza Alone? | Ahmad vs. Ehsan! | 379 |
| 10 | The Idlib Pit: Silence on a Crime and the Double Standards of #STG Supporters
An Idlib-based activist named "Mohammad Jabbas" has revealed something that deserves far more attention than it has received. A stone quarry in #Idlib governorate, on the road to Maarrat Masrin, was used as an execution site. Residents of the Shia towns of Kafriya and Al-Fua, along with anyone labeled a "shabiha", were thrown into it and killed. This was happening as early as 2012, a full year before the #Tadamon_massacre ever entered the public conversation.
But what sets this apart is not only the crime. It is how it was talked about. The activists Ansar Shahhoud, Ugor Ungor(Turkish), Hazem Al-Abdullah, Domar Al-Suleiman, and Mohannad Abu Al-Hassan exposed the Tadamon massacre at considerable personal cost.
Mohammad Jabbas, by contrast, spoke about the Idlib pit with pride, calling it "transitional justice at the hands of Idlib's heroes". That framing is not incidental. It reflects the same mindset behind today's casual boasting about sectarian killings, the same culture that produces phrases like "that pig was killed with a banana peel" without a hint of discomfort.
The responses to his posts confirmed everything. Dozens of commenters backed up the account, naming a man called "Abu Ahmad Al-Ahm" as the one who ran the executions and praying for his soul. Others said they were there and witnessed who "Shabiha" were thrown, flew and spoke about it as they were recounting something honorable, and fair.
There is no version of transitional justice that can be credibly built by those who are themselves implicated in the killing.
What is being called justice today is revenge, carried out by people whose own record over the past 14 years is one of horrific violence and terror. In that respect, they are not so different from the regime they claim to have opposed.
Which brings us to the question no one in these circles seems willing to answer. Where are the people within the "Revolution" camp willing to do what Ansar Shahhoud, Domar Al-Suleiman, and the others did (people who, it is worth noting, all come from minority communities) when it came to exposing Amjad Al-Yousef? Why has that kind of honesty been so entirely absent here?
Link to the original post which has not yet been deleted as of the time of writing this post:
https://www.facebook.com/share/199Qc1UKDL/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Join us on Instagram | Facebook | 447 |
| 11 | Нет текста... | 386 |
| 12 | 🇺🇸 Do not believe the fake rebranding of JD Vance
JD Vance has come out with seemingly critical views of the Zionist entity, in order to sell the idea that Netanyahu is "rogue" and acting on his own. This way, the US can claim plausible deniability with regards to the MoU with Iran and the US' violation of the first clause regarding Lebanon, as well as to stop the bleeding from the massive exodus from the Republican Party over the issue of support for "israel" in time for the upcoming midterms.
The idea of "israel" going "rogue" is out of the Zionist Brookings Institute think tank's "Leave It to Bibi" strategy of placing all blame on Netanyahu in order to wash the US' hands clean of anything the Zionist regime does.
The idea that Netanyahu acts as a bull in a china shop, dragging a helpless lamb like the US into war, goes against reality. The problem of "israel" is bigger than just Netanyahu, and the problem of Zionism and Jewish supremacy is bigger than just "israel."
Wealthy Jewish elites have been deeply involved in the US power structure since the days of the British colonies. The US was never "hijacked" — it was always this way and likely was created to be this big empire that would back up global Zionist aspirations in Palestine and elsewhere in the world.
The US and "israel" have some degree of autonomy and separation from each other, but that is minor. In the grand scheme, they operate as one.
No matter what longtime Zionist apologist Alex Jones of Disinfo Wars says to rehabilitate JD Vance and say that Vance tried to stop "israel" and that "israel" responded by carpet bombing Lebanon is nothing but pure PR to pretend like the US upheld its end of the MoU and to save the dying Republican Party.
JD Vance owes his career in politics to the Jewish supremacist head of Palantir, Alex Karp, as well as Palantir's main financier Peter Thiel.
Only if the current US system is abolished and replaced by a new system which isn't Satanic, should the US and "israel" be considered one entity. Both are arms of international Zionism, as the leader of Ansarallah has recently described them as.
@BasiraPress | 3 047 |
| 13 | 🇱🇧 🕊 Support displaced families in Lebanon!
The organizers say that donations have been slowing down yet the requests from the displaced keep coming in.
Donate here to make sure their funds are able to meet the increasing demand: https://chuffed.org/project/177007-fundraiser-for-aiding-displaced-people-from-southern-lebanon-beqaa-and-dahyeh-with-necessary-meds | 500 |
| 14 | 🇮🇷 A Muharram event focused on the parallels between Imam Hussain (a) and Martyr Malcolm X (ra) will be held at Midnight Books in Los Angeles
June 28th at 6:30PM
Our book is available there — pick up a copy while you're there! | 457 |
| 15 | 🇮🇷| ❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by Khanalizadeh
According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected.
After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it.
After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all.
He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis.
Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file.
This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions.
After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader.
The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions.
Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure.
The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit.
After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU.
The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks.
SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member.
Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented.
One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …).
Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU.
Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.”
The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework.
The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC.
@FotrosResistancee | 276 |
| 16 | 🇺🇸 US based Islamic scholar Sheikh Usama Abdulghani on the recent MoU between Iran and the USA
🚩 ResistanceTrench | Boost | 347 |
| 17 | ⚠️‼️ We welcome you to follow the Khaybar News Network, an international coalition of channels that support and showcase current affairs, events, updates and analysis on the Axis of Resistance.
🇸🇾 ⬜ ⚪ ⬛ 🌟🌟
⚫ 🎥 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 ❤️
🌟 🌟 🌟 😏 🖼 🌟
🌟 🌟 🔥 🔲 😁 🌟
KNN brings you a global alliance spanning a number of languages and represents multiple communities, all of whom are unified in their support for Palestine, the Islamic Resistance and the fight against colonial corruption.
Join Khaybar News Network
For the latest news and related topics, click the link above | 483 |
| 18 | 🚨 The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy announced the complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The IRGC Navy stated the closure is in response to the crimes committed by the zionist entity in Lebanon and the violation of ceasefire pledges by the United States. All vessels are warned against approaching the Strait of Hormuz, citing risks to their security. | 429 |
| 19 | 🥀😭 What is the sin of my child, slaughtered by an enemy's arrow?
♨️ The “Hussaini Infants” ceremony was held at the holy shrine to commemorate the martyrdom of Ali Al-Asghar (as).
📹 FatemeSadat Alavi
📥 The higher quality + text
🆔 @ImamRezaEN
📲 +989338604490 | 441 |
| 20 | "But if they break their pledges after their having made a treaty and revile your religion, then fight the leaders of unfaith—indeed, they have no [commitment to] pledges,—maybe they will desist." — Qur'an 9:12
This was the holy verse recited by the spokesman of the Iranian Khatam al-Anbiya HQ upon announcing the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. | 423 |
Уже доступно! Исследование Telegram 2025 — ключевые инсайты года 
