Folkish Worldview

When you press Christians hard enough, they'll retreat to something like "well, Christianity united the white race" or "Christianity built Europe". But when they make this argument they're accepting the pagan frame. One of the most basic differences between Christianity and paganism is that Christians think your politics should follow your morality and religion. This has crept into the discourse, so that they accuse pagans of being "race idolators" or of having a "political religion", as though that's a problem. But pagans say that's just how religion works. We say that morality is a branch of politics. When they say we're "race idolators" they're shooting themselves in the foot. For pagans, political language is identical with religious language, an identification that Christians reject. Paganism is literally a political religion: the religion of the polis, or the folk. This isn't a bug but a feature. When Christians speak in the language of service to the race, that Europeans were "never better" than under Christendom, they are speaking pagan political language. They are invoking our theology against us, which is a battle they will lose in the long run. When Christian identitarians say that their religion is good because it's good for our race, this forces people to think in pagan theological terms whether they understand it or not. Under the surface these Christians have become spiritually pagan, even if they remain superficially Christian. The match between whiteness and a specific religion is a structural feature of paganism, and paganism alone. @folkishworldview