اکنون در دسترس! پژوهش تلگرام ۲۰۲۵ — مهمترین بینشهای سال 
0/0
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام 0/0
کانال 0/0 (@error0error) در بخش زبانی عربی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 10 558 مشترک است و جایگاه 8 791 را در دسته دین و مذهبی و رتبه 7 291 را در منطقه المملكة العربية السعودية دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 10 558 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 26 ژوئن, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 287 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 6 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 18.33% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 6.09% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 1 934 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 643 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 0 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“0/0 = undefined
A labyrinth of ideas,
A diary of curiosities
Bot: @contactzero_bot”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 27 ژوئن, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته دین و مذهبی تبدیل کردهاند.
10 558
مشترکین
+624 ساعت
+427 روز
+28730 روز
آرشیو پست ها
10 558
Nationalist sentiment was not in short supply; lots of that was sloshing around in the Middle World at this time. The trouble was, most of the new nation-states were rather artificial. Afghanistan, for example, had been created by Russia and Britain. Iran, until recently, had been a loose conglomeration of disparate parts, an empire, not a country. Turkey was a nation-state because Atatürk said so. As for India, where does one even begin?But the most problematic region for nationalism was the Arab heartland.
10 558
It’s easy to forget that the organization of the world into countries is less than a century old. In fact this process was not fully completed until after World War II. Between 1945 and 1975, some one hundred new countries were born, and every inch of earth finally belonged to some nation-state or other.
10 558
Geographically, many of the “nations” that the liberation movements strove to liberate were defined by borders the imperialist powers had drawn: so even in their struggle for liberation they were playing out a story set in motion by Europeans.
10 558
In principle, the League of Nations endorsed the idea of self-rule in the Arab world, but in practice, it implemented the Sykes-Picot agreement, dividing the area into zones called “mandates,” which were awarded to Britain and France. The document setting up these mandates called them territories “inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world” and said “the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their . . . experience . . . can best undertake this responsibility.” In short, it spoke of Arabs as children and of Europeans as grown-ups who would take care of them until they could do grown-up things like feed themselves.
10 558
The composition of vast books is a laborious and impoverishing extravagance. To go on for five hundred pages developing an idea whose perfect oral exposition is possible in a few minutes! A better course of procedure is to pretend that these books already exist, and then to offer a resume, a commentary.
More reasonable, more inept, more indolent, I have preferred to write notes upon imaginary books. Such are “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius,” “An Examination of the Work of Herbert Quain,” “The Approach to Al-Mu’tasim.”
— Jorge Luis Borges
10 558
Those who forged the United States—politicians, historians, philosophers, writers, thinkers, and citizens in general—asserted a nationalist idea quite distinct from the ideologies spawned in Europe. Instead of seeking nationhood in a common religion, history, traditions, customs, race, or ethnic identity, they proposed that multitudes of individuals could become “a people” by virtue of shared principles and shared allegiance to a process. It was a nationalism based on ideas, a nationalism that anyone could embrace because, in theory, it was a nation any person could become a member of, not just those who were born into it.
— Destiny Disrupted
10 558
In aesthetics, for example, an Indian and a German might disagree about what was beautiful, but this didn’t mean one side was right and the other wrong. Each judgment reflected a volksgeist (German for 'spirit of the people') and was true only insofar as it truly expressed the volksgeist. A value judgment could rise no higher than the level of the nation. Herder wasn’t saying one nation was better than another, just that they were different, and that one nation couldn’t be judged by the values of another.
Herder's follower, a German philosopher named Fichte, suggested that some volks (German for 'nations') might actually be superior to others. Specifically, he suggested that Germans were better than others.
— Destiny Disrupted
10 558
Repost from N/a
you're not a 'night owl' you're actually doing something called "revenge bedtime procrastination" which is where you stay up really late after work/school/ college because it's your way of reclaiming time that you feel was taken from you throughout the day and this is you trying to feel like you have a little bit of control over your life.
