TruthHammer 🙏🇺🇸 (DM's & Channel Spam are FAKERS.)

Politicians spend a lot of time saying how important confidence in our elections is. But way more time doing nothing to make them believable.

Liberals and media are now putting pressure on Spencer Pratt to concede. The thing to watch now, is if he will fight this, or back down.

My guess is they succeed in pushing Pratt off the November ballot, and Pratt sues, and loses in lower court, and loses on appeal to District Court. SCOTUS is the wild card. Will other cases they are already looking at get resolved, and does that give Pratt grounds for appeal that can’t get tossed out so easily? IDK, but my expectation is HIGH for the Pratt case bringing awareness to many, and LOW for it to be resolved in his favor.

Gee, I wonder why Trump would do this? Israel for last. The spastic people do NOT control the timing, and do NOT control what the end state posture of our diplomacy policy will be. If you've paid attention, then for years you have heard me articulate a fair and rational posture. Arms-length. Not our enemy, not our bestie. End the foreign aid. Remove dual citizens from Congress. They make a mess, they clean it up. We will always treat Israel with respect due to the DEEP spiritual connection most people believe exists between that land and its decedents with our ancient Biblical heritage. *Actual deep facts about the modern nations connection to ancient Israel aren't relevant to modern political realities. You aren't capable of political nuance if you don't understand this point. Same applies to the topic of actual lineage vs apparent lineage. Some truths go far beyond the political realm we are dealing with here, and can only be understood on an individual level based on personal spiritual journey... so yeah, there's a lot I'm not saying to avoid muddying the waters on this commentary about the official legal relationship between two nations, and certain cultural beliefs that are going to affect it whether you agree those beliefs are well founded or not.

I tried ignoring this topic, but sadly many fell for the BS. Section 224 of the NDAA is nothing but a proposal framework for joint development and sharing of specific military technologies. Anyone who knows what a corporate Master Services Agreement is will understand. It’s a template for how any cooperative projects must be managed. If you’re blackpilled and believe Israel controls the world, you are against ANY cooperation of any kind, and will inflate this with wild exaggeration to mislead and scare people. If you notice all the times Trump is trying to push Israel back into its lane, you might notice these types of agreements were already happening randomly with little oversight, and now they have to go through a channel and must all operate in a consistent way. A channel that makes it easier to say no when needed, instead of two years later finding out a harmful project is already underway, and mysteriously only sharing tech and data in one direction. (Hint: the people who benefited from unmonitored agreements, are having a field day stirring up the blackpilled to denounce this). But don’t take my word for it. Just read section 224 and none of the retarded claims about merging our militaries are there.

You just can’t do certain things with leakers and obstructionists in your ranks.

Just followed me a few days ago. Hopefully I can get him to report my voter & Congress education topic on his podcast.

As an accountant trained in audit design, I’m excited to see Pulte, a man who knows about ALL of the mortgages & finances, also having access to connect the dots across intelligence files. 💀👉 Let’s find out who can’t explain their money. Some version of this is largely correct.

Almost a million people have been exposed to this idea since I researched it. Keep it up. I would never presume to say what Trump will do, but educating people on the options that do exist for Congress to act, doesn’t hurt, no matter how hard some of have given up and black pilled. The FACT is, that a GOP controlled Congress DOES NOT HAVE TO SWEAR OUR MARXIST CHEATER ENEMIES INTO OFFICE, and most people didn’t know this.

If other channels you’re on haven’t shared this yet (or made their own version of equivalent info…) it’s time to ask them why.

It’s funny that some people think I’m being too optimistic, when this is the closing paragraph of my essay… “But ultimately YOU are the only thing that can make Congress have the spine required to seize this opportunity. Clearly Trump is teeing it up to make this possible. The Republic is being given a chance to save itself, and needs to step up.”

Let’s be realistic… Congress will never have the balls to use their power in way that would bring this much public backlash… UNLESS an even louder faction is demanding it. The People will only have themselves to blame if it doesn’t happen. That’s just how Congress works.

I strongly encourage people to steal this content and use it in their own posts. No credit requested or wanted. Just get the knowledge into the public awareness.

Ask yourself “do I believe Trump’s ego is big enough that he would seek a path to achieve a super majority and leave a legacy of passing urgently needed constitutional amendments?” Don’t say he can’t find a way to force the GOP to do it… but we’ll see.

The numbers above are extreme and it would certainly not play out that way. Some states will comply rather than risk their members of Congress not being sworn in, and being unable to vote. Some states have stated they will NOT comply, and those states are all Democrat controlled... so it becomes pretty obvious that any members of Congress not seated are going to cause the balance of control to swing strongly towards Republicans. 🔥After January 3, 2027 the Trump admin could have a Super Majority in House and Senate. They can pass regular legislation unopposed and even Constitutional Amendments that would still need to be ratified by 38 States before they can take effect. But let's be realistic about something that concerns us all. Even with a clear path to seize a powerful majority and force states to run compliant elections... will Republicans do it? The hope needed might be found in the newer more fired up slate of Congress already lining up for 2026 elections. Redistricting is already expanding Republican leads in the House. Many powerful RINOs are on their way out. But ultimately YOU are the only thing that can make Congress have the spine required to seize this opportunity. Clearly Trump is teeing it up to make this possible. The Republic is being given a chance to save itself, and needs to step up.

For years I have believed Trump's ultimate plan for his legacy is to both drain the DC swamp AND to pass Constitutional Amendments that will correct suicidal defects in some of our institutions... but I never saw exactly how he could accomplish that with so much resistance from both Dems and RINOs. 👀👉A way has suddenly become clear even if it would require Republicans to be more aggressive than they have been willing to be in the past, and it seems that Trump has already taken initial steps to set it up. There is a looming battle between certain states, and the federal government, over the issue of voter eligibility, and whether the states can be forced to comply with federal law. Up to 30 states are currently dragging their feet, or outright refusing, to prove their voter rolls are compliant with federal requirements about citizenship, with many lawsuits pending. Courts are so far refusing to block Trump Executive Order 14399 outright requiring states to verify federal election voter eligibility, and imposes requirements on the USPS for handling mail in ballots, however on 8 occasions lower courts have so far ruled against the DOJ trying to get voter rolls from California, Oregon, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, Arizona, Maine, Wisconsin. None of these cases have gone to the US Supreme Court yet. If this Order is ultimately upheld, then it and existing federal election law, set up conditions where some state elections may be deemed invalid. If the controversial idea of ending the Senate filibuster is often described as a "nuclear option", then what's coming in January 2027 and January 2029 could be both vastly more powerful and vastly more controversial, yet well within the constitutional power of Republicans at that time... because the Republican controlled House and Senate will have no obligation to accept the results of non-compliant state elections. Let me repeat this point. If a state runs an election that is known to be non-compliant with federal election laws, then the House & Senate have the authority to CHOOSE NOT TO seat their respective new members until a new election is run that COMPLIES WITH THE LAW. See Article I, Section 5 authority. In today's highly polarized political climate ask yourself... what factors would encourage Republicans to seize this power sitting in their hands, versus what factors would encourage them to dilute their own power and swear their ideological enemies into office? Many arguments and counter arguments are possible for those trying to predict what Republicans WILL do. I am merely showing what they may be in a position to do. 👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. House may refuse to seat any new Representative from states that will not comply. These 30 states have about 280 House Reps up for election in 2026... so the number of sworn in Representatives could legally drop as low as 155 in 2026. Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case) Only 78 House Reps would be needed for simple majority vote business in 2027. IN 2027 ONLY 104 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE. 👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. Senate may refuse to seat any new Senator from states that will not comply. These same 30 states have about 30 Senators up for election with roughly 15 in 2026 and 15 in 2028... so the number of sworn in Senators could legally drop to 85 in 2026 and 70 in 2028. Again, Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case) Only 43 Senators would be needed for normal majority vote business in 2027, and only 36 in 2029. IN 2027 ONLY 57 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE.