The Marauder Project

Gn Season 1, Episode 2 - Joe Pera Takes You to Breakfast

Pondering the Longhouse

You aren't the Doom Slayer. You pretend you can slay demons but tremble at the idea of doing a 400 meter dash. You're a mega based chad because you blast tren but you can't imagine going a week without porn. You're supposedly fulfilling the golden physique of your ancestors but immediately get out of breath when someone asks you to do more than a dozen reps. You're easy to kill, easy to corrupt, quick to betray, and quick to pump your own ego. Humble yourself daily, deny your passions, and train harder.

Yes, the sin of pride is one hell of a retarded drug.

Pattern comparisons, kryptek was being used as opfor pattern by these fellows.

The demonization of eggs persists even to the modern day despite having been debunked in the mainstream long ago. A very clear example of this is looking at the nutritional facts on a carton of eggs and seeing that the cholesterol content of one egg is supposedly 57% of an adult's daily consumption for cholesterol. Doing even the most simplest and mainstream research shows this isn't true. The following images are screenshot's from Harvard Health's article on the topic which admits that the liver synthesizes around 1000mg of cholesterol a day even if you eat none in your diet, and will downscale automatically its own production based on your dietary consumption. Considering that you only absorb 50% of the cholesterol content of food via digestion, you would need to eat a dozen eggs or more a day to deplete you're liver's baseline synthesis. This also doesn't factor that eggs and cholesterol generally are super foods, acting as hormone precursor with effects nearing anabolic steroids when consumed daily.

So much to be revealed in tiny cartoons.

Sometimes we develop abstract political opinions that are completely inapplicable to personal life and it begs the question, if having that opinion is of no practical or moral benefit personally, then why even have it? For example, it would not surprise you that many in our sphere are incredibly critical (using polite words) of the nation of Israel, and how they operate generally. In their most recent hostage rescue raid, they rescued 4 of their hostages after inflicting nearly 300 civilian casualties on the locals who were tactically placed around the hostages by Hamas. Of course, this is decried by many people for obvious reasons - that injuring or killing civilians in a military operation represents a horrible moral problem. However, I also know that if something were to happen in my personal life where my own people were being held hostage, and the most effective way of retrieving them unharmed is to strike with the utmost brutality and violence by overwhelming and destroying the enemy as best I might, I would definitely do it. What am I expected to do, abandon my people? Of course there are moral implications that will always be considered in hindsight, but my main point here is that perhaps we try so hard to have a controversial opinion toward the people we disagree with that we actively adopt positions that we are completely unhelpful to us in any practical way.