fa
Feedback
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺

Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺

رفتن به کانال در Telegram

Personal Trainer, Melbourne. ⚡️Diet plans & online coaching 👉🏻Contact: @BlairCottrell

نمایش بیشتر

📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺

کانال Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺 (@realblaircottrell) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 19 614 مشترک است و جایگاه 1 086 را در دسته سبک زندگی سالم و رتبه 562 را در منطقه المملكة المتحدة دارد.

📊 شاخص‌های مخاطب و پویایی

از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 19 614 مشترک جذب کرده است.

بر اساس آخرین داده‌ها در تاریخ 04 ژوئیه, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 37 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر -8 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گسترده‌ای حفظ شده است.

  • وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
  • نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 47.26% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 19.86% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب می‌کند.
  • دسترسی پست‌ها: هر پست به طور میانگین 9 271 بازدید دریافت می‌کند. در اولین روز معمولاً 3 895 بازدید جمع‌آوری می‌شود.
  • واکنش‌ها و تعامل: مخاطبان به‌طور فعال حمایت می‌کنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 472 است.
  • علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند speech, joel, activist, coalition, fear تمرکز دارد.

📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی

نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاه‌های شخصی توصیف می‌کند:
Personal Trainer, Melbourne. ⚡️Diet plans & online coaching 👉🏻Contact: @BlairCottrell

به لطف به‌روزرسانی‌های پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 05 ژوئیه, 2026)، کانال همواره به‌روز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیل‌ها نشان می‌دهد مخاطبان به‌طور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته سبک زندگی سالم تبدیل کرده‌اند.

19 614
مشترکین
-824 ساعت
-87 روز
+3730 روز

در حال بارگیری داده...

جذب مشترکین
ژوئیه '26
ژوئیه '26
+15
در 10 کانال‌ها
ژوئن '26
+269
در 126 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '26
+220
در 105 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+182
در 89 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+156
در 106 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+186
در 88 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '26
+450
در 157 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '25
+356
در 88 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+197
در 71 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+250
در 99 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+685
در 178 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+390
در 121 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+180
در 65 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+169
در 75 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '25
+339
در 123 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+174
در 75 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+303
در 113 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+578
در 100 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+399
در 144 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+332
در 119 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+189
در 71 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+252
در 78 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+352
در 113 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+518
در 151 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+298
در 104 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+350
در 101 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '24
+285
در 104 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+385
در 123 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+317
در 122 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+279
در 101 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+299
در 118 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+325
در 99 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+314
در 99 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+278
در 111 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+217
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '23
+221
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '23
+200
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '23
+217
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '23
+670
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '23
+187
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '23
+547
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '23
+333
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '23
+675
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '22
+415
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '22
+407
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '22
+237
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '22
+288
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '22
+401
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '22
+231
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '22
+361
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '22
+361
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '22
+591
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '22
+864
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '22
+101
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '22
+202
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '21
+233
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '21
+351
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '21
+681
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '21
+2 739
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '21
+2 620
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '21
+1 795
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '21
+274
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '21
+470
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '21
+625
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '21
+1 347
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '21
+581
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '21
+799
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '20
+4 545
در 0 کانال‌ها
تاریخ
رشد مشترکین
اشارات
کانال‌ها
04 ژوئیه+2
03 ژوئیه+3
02 ژوئیه+3
01 ژوئیه+7
پست‌های کانال
They say to be careful you don’t go broke acting rich. You should also make sure you don’t become retarded trying to make eve
They say to be careful you don’t go broke acting rich. You should also make sure you don’t become retarded trying to make everyone think you’re a good person.

2
The listing of the White Australia Party as a prohibited hate group is being reviewed by a parliamentary committee, and publi
The listing of the White Australia Party as a prohibited hate group is being reviewed by a parliamentary committee, and public submissions are now open. https://www.noticer.news/white-australia-partys-prohibited-hate-group-listing-under-review/ Follow: @NoticerNews
25
3
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8jrzemdyko
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8jrzemdyko
4 652
4
Intense https://t.me/NoticerNews/3688
5 108
5
Clearly this guy never sat in traffic with Indians
Clearly this guy never sat in traffic with Indians
8 132
6
https://youtu.be/sg7PIP7o4mM
5 855
7
The ADL recently added the phrase ‘goyslop’ to its hate-symbols database.
The ADL recently added the phrase ‘goyslop’ to its hate-symbols database.
10 193
8
Might I add that it takes about 3 months to reset your dopamine sensitivity. Some people can recover faster but 90 days is always the general rule for regeneration. https://t.me/realsolbrah/5715
6 180
9
Welcome to diversity. Things that are banned here: -White people -Ideas -Air conditioning
6 792
10
actual news 😳😳
actual news 😳😳
5 188
11
The ‘centre-right’ or whatever you want to call it has a massive cringe issue and its women. Dolled-up women wearing bleached
The ‘centre-right’ or whatever you want to call it has a massive cringe issue and its women. Dolled-up women wearing bleached wigs and covered in brown paint on podiums and political podcasts, saying a lot without actually saying anything. I can’t always tell if they’re well-intentioned or not, their motivations are unclear but what I can say is they’re boring and insipid. They’re never interesting, funny or articulate and everything they do manage to say just underpins exactly how little they understand the concept of justice, real solutions and what is necessary. No sensible person wants to listen to a woman’s political opinions, because: a) They’re not even actual opinions, they just say whatever makes them feel or look morally righteous. b) They personalise everything. Every single talking point is brought back to themselves and individual experiences, which don’t matter in politics, and c) They’re usually just selling products (or themselves). Why do men continue to tolerate and perpetuate this shit?
10 589
12
“Ban social media to stop the Nazis, and protect women from anal-tearing.” –Prime Minister of Australia 2026 https://t.me/ausvstheagenda/3945
7 433
13
Lately I’ve been looking at society through a new lens. I was never an economist. I always felt that money was associated with pain but I didn’t think much about the details, I just got busy thinking about people and politics irrespective of money. Knowing what I know now, that was probably a mistake. But over the past year or so I’ve had the opportunity to spend time with a few people who understand money better than I ever did, specifically how to make money. I’ve previously heard a lot about money being debt and illegitimately invented by banks through loans, and while that’s all probably true it doesn’t change the fact we all use money everyday and most of us don’t know how to live without it. We also don’t really understand how it works. We don’t learn about money in the schools and financial reports usually look like intimidating mathematics, so no one gives it much thought because it all seems too difficult to follow. But the reality of money is staggeringly simple and when you understand how people get rich, you start to see one central cog in the money machine which literally runs the entire system. That central cog is problems. Keep reading, this is very simple and it’ll all make perfect sense by the end. Money is made by solving problems or at least temporarily keeping a problem at bay. That problem could be existential, physical or personal, it could be buying food because hunger doesn’t feel nice and starving to death represents a bit of a problem too. You might have a leaking tap you pay a plumber to fix, or an aching knee you buy medicine to alleviate. You probably bought a Netflix subscription to stave off boredom or loneliness. The point is: The more problems you have (or the more you think you have) the more money you spend. People with fewer problems spend less money; it’s harder to get rich in a society if it doesn’t have a lot of problems. Understanding this I began to see why everybody was so sensitive or unwell: Because their vulnerability to insult or disease was extremely profitable. If people pay to alleviate pain, then it makes sense to produce a society where the people are experiencing more pain. This has completely transformed my view of how things work and pretty much explains everything. Why for example would a government running a system like this have any interest in actually solving problems? If an authority structure exists on the basis of taking your money in the form of taxation to solve society’s problems, wouldn’t it make sense for that authority to make the problems bigger? It’s of course important to act as through solutions are coming, but they never do and they never will, because in order for the money to keep “moving up” problems need to remain and there’s plenty of incentive to deliberately make the problems worse. This is really worth thinking about.
6 474
14
“The evil was not in bread and circuses, per se, but in the willingness of the people to sell their rights as free men for fu
“The evil was not in bread and circuses, per se, but in the willingness of the people to sell their rights as free men for full bellies and the excitement of the games which would serve to distract them from the other human hungers which bread and circuses can never appease.” Admiral Ben Moreell, CEC, USN
6 153
15
So I saw this meme going around, like an ironic 4chan style mockery of anti-racist diversity. A panicking 5ft tall woman-cop
So I saw this meme going around, like an ironic 4chan style mockery of anti-racist diversity. A panicking 5ft tall woman-cop accidentally shoots a Rabbi, who was walking out of Pornhub HQ of course, after her partner cop named Mohammed is shot via random citizen chimp-out, in Canada (with all the gun laws). The meme seemed overly detailed, so I looked it up. Oh, it’s the news.
6 798
16
To me it was always obvious that “gangster rap” and associated “hood-dwelling” was a fake counterculture. It was clearly prop
To me it was always obvious that “gangster rap” and associated “hood-dwelling” was a fake counterculture. It was clearly propped up by the institutions and meant to ensnare ‘alternative-thinking youths’ into a destructive, go-nowhere existence. I’m glad BLM and hard-Left hysterics have made it obvious to everyone else too.
11 761
17
To me it always obvious that “gangster rap” and associated “hood-dwelling” was a fake counterculture, meant to ensnare ‘alter
To me it always obvious that “gangster rap” and associated “hood-dwelling” was a fake counterculture, meant to ensnare ‘alternative-thinking youths’ into a destructive, go-nowhere existence. I’m glad BLM and hard-Left hysterics have made it obvious to everyone else too.
1
18
Hear: “I have never felt as wrong, stupid and disempowered as I currently do in this parliament.” She’s obviously not being t+1
Hear: “I have never felt as wrong, stupid and disempowered as I currently do in this parliament.” She’s obviously not being threatened and isn’t actually “unsafe”. She’s just wrong and no longer feels in control. And that’s a good thing. For people like this, words are only a trick and a means to an end. Don’t fall for it.
11 885
19
You’ll often hear certain women and woman-bureaucrats in particular talk a lot about “feeling safe”. But I’ve noticed that their idea of “feeling safe” has little in common with actual safety. You have to remember that words are just noise and a means to an end. What one creature really means when it spits out a certain word might not have much to do with that word’s literal definition. A normal person would assume the term “safe” means protected from or not exposed to danger or harm, but that’s not what the system-ladies mean when they appeal to safety. “Feeling safe” is a remark associated with control, equality dogma and so-called “inclusive environments” (read: ideology, more women and more migrants). “Feeling unsafe” is the noise made concerning “the Far Right” (read: White guys and the discussion of facts, respectively). But White guys are statistically far less likely to pose any physical threat to women. They’re less likely to assault them, less likely to murder them and almost never rape them. Migrants of certain demographics rape, assault and murder women (and girls) at dramatically higher rates. Actually, the danger migrants pose to females increases in direct proportion to the fewer White guys there are in a respective area. Women can’t and don’t effectively protect other women from harm. Only men will do that and statistically, White men do it most often. Women may literally be more safe when they’re in the company of White guys than they are in any other environment, except perhaps a panic room. The more White guys there are and the fewer migrants, the safer women are. These “hate-facts” are cold data. So what are the government ladies actually talking about when they claim to be “feeling safe” or “unsafe”? Well these terms are not just an imagined female experience, they’re a power-play which ironically just ends up making society far more dangerous for women. If you pay attention, “feeling safe” means: “Feeling right and in control of a verbal exchange.” While “feeling unsafe” means: “Being proven wrong and feeling stupid or without power”. When a woman-bureaucrat in parliament for example says “I feel unsafe” she doesn’t mean she is being threatened or at risk of any measurable harm. She means “I am being made to feel wrong or stupid by a fact, a general consensus or by what someone else is saying.” In summary, it’s far more important for government-women and their equivalent male-effeminates to feel right and in-control than it is to actually be safe. These lawmakers will actually sacrifice the safety of all of society’s women in exchange for power or even just the feeling of power. It’s eery to think that as a country, while importing the third-world we are gleefully shutting down open discussions, censoring facts, limiting speech and banning political parties all on the basis of very obvious female language manipulation.
17 784
20
Wars killing millions were started for much less. https://t.me/NoticerNews/3614
10 890