¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
Builders
Ir al canal en Telegram
Telegram-native tools, open source & independent tools.tg @tools_community
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Builders
El canal Builders (@builders) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 3 840 028 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 23 en la categoría Criptomonedas y el puesto 31 en la región Internacional.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 3 840 028 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 10 junio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -125 023, y en las últimas 24 horas de -2 998, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: Verificado (confirmado oficialmente por Telegram)
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 1.80%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener N/A% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 0 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 0 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Telegram-native tools, open source & independent
tools.tg
@tools_community”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 11 junio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Criptomonedas.
3 840 028
Suscriptores
-2 99824 horas
-31 1217 días
-125 02330 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
junio '26
junio '260
en 0 canales
mayo '260
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '260
en 15 canales
Get PRO
marzo '260
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '260
en 1 canales
Get PRO
enero '260
en 6 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '250
en 6 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '250
en 7 canales
Get PRO
octubre '250
en 22 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '250
en 17 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+68
en 4 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+43
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+48 964
en 2 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+350
en 8 canales
Get PRO
abril '250
en 8 canales
Get PRO
marzo '250
en 10 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+3 134
en 5 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+386
en 181 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+92 895
en 224 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+1 074 483
en 16 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+202 130
en 36 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+379 989
en 32 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+1 977 206
en 78 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+771 534
en 38 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+891 533
en 319 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+837 306
en 91 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+102 210
en 25 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+2 500 525
en 42 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+329 044
en 78 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+1 520 671
en 47 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+30 073
en 50 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+10 781
en 68 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+74 211
en 23 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 11 junio | 0 | |||
| 10 junio | 0 | |||
| 09 junio | 0 | |||
| 08 junio | 0 | |||
| 07 junio | 0 | |||
| 06 junio | 0 | |||
| 05 junio | 0 | |||
| 04 junio | 0 | |||
| 03 junio | 0 | |||
| 02 junio | 0 | |||
| 01 junio | 0 |
Publicaciones del Canal
Communities for Stickers
Access is now fully integrated with Sticker Pad. Launched a pack? Create a holder chat in one tap.
Already running:
– Aynami Rei (194 members)
– Not Wise :: Classics (110 members)
– Baron ICE GANG (495 members)
That's where the community lives. Go build yours.
Guide: how to create holder chat
🌐
| 2 |  Access: Recap
A lot has changed since the last snapshot.
More and more strong communities are choosing the tool to shape their groups.
Current stats:
– 2K active chats (+233%)
– 49K members connected (+96%)
Among the largest by asset value: Dogs Premium Holders, Pixel Strategy Whales, Snoop X BAYC Club, Groypers and $BUILD Diamond Hands.
Meanwhile, the technical side keeps evolving to make ownership verification stable and the flow seamless for both admins and members.
@builders | 0 |
| 3 | $BUILD is still in its early stage, where we are setting up contests for builders and shipping the first tools to the public.
The idea is to build an economy from real usage of valuable tools, similar to $HYPE and others (very few tho) that managed to create sustainable tokenomics.
At this stage, $BUILD have around 19k holders that got tokens via @earn, developer contests and the open market.
Once we prove the revenue -> buyback model works, we are going to shape the tokenomics which would actually work long term. Doing it too early might ruin the whole thing so we are not rushing with it.
For now, the best indicator of our progress is the consistency of launching contests, developing and shipping tools, and growing the user base, despite of the “bear market” and an overall silence across other projects in crypto, TON and Telegram | 0 |
| 4 | keep building 🫡 | 0 |
| 5 | Collab
A Telegram-native marketplace for buying and selling ads.
🔍 Discover channels or receive ad requests
💰 Secure payments with escrow
🎨 Approve and manage creatives
📊 Access verified Telegram stats
🤖 Automate posting and verification
Tool revenue supports the $BUILD ecosystem.
While the app is in development, the waitlist for channel owners is open
Add your channel, invite referrals and get early access with priority promotion and additional benefits.
@builders | 0 |
| 6 | Ads Marketplace Contest — Results & Insights
50+ submissions received.
We reviewed every entry: manual code review, product testing, and AI-assisted codebase analysis.
The spread was wide — from empty repos to solid MVPs.
Common issues we found:
1. Channel Stats
In our view, the best approach for channel analytics is MTProto’s method stats.getBroadcastStats — it gives you subscribers, avg views, Premium ratio, language breakdown, growth charts, all from one call. That said, we were open to other original solutions that could reliably deliver the same data — as long as the implementation was your own, not a call to an external analytics API.
In practice, most submissions claimed «verified channel stats» but only called getChatMemberCount via Bot API — which gives you subscriber count and nothing else.
2. Payments and Escrow
The most common area of weakness. Most projects did integrate with TON in some form, but the implementation quality varied a lot.
Some of the recurring issues:
– All deals sharing one wallet with no fund isolation — one security breach and everything is compromised
– Fund release and refund operations that aren’t safe to retry — if the service crashes mid-process, funds can be sent twice or never sent
– No locks or atomicity in background workers handling payments — race conditions leading to duplicate transactions
– Transaction verification that doesn’t actually check the blockchain
In general, any operation involving money needs to be designed for the worst case: crashes, retries, concurrent calls. This applies also to ad posting, not just escrow.
Some of these are understandable in an MVP context, but they still influenced how we evaluated the submissions.
3. Broken demos
Some demos weren’t functional, and self-deploy instructions were missing or incomplete. In those cases, hands-on product testing wasn’t conducted.
4. Overengineered Flows
Surprisingly common. Many projects added unnecessary complexity on top of the core deal flow – extra entities, extra verification steps, approval stages, duplicated logic. In some cases, both sides had to create separate entities before a deal could even start. Simpler would have been better.
5. AI-Generated Code Without Review
Nothing wrong with using AI as a development tool — most strong submissions did. The issue is when AI generates 90–100% of the code and no one reviews the result. Several projects had that pattern: boilerplate architecture, identical comments, extremely long and overcomplicated functions, code that doesn’t actually work when you run it. AI can speed things up significantly, but it shouldn’t fully replace the work of developer.
Thank you to everyone who participated — we appreciate the time and effort.
Even if you didn't win this time, we noticed your work.
Strong contributors stay on our radar for future opportunities, whether that's future contests or contributing to our open-source tools.
More news on the Ads Marketplace tool coming next week.
@builders
🌐 | 0 |
