Builders
Telegram-native tools, open source & independent tools.tg @tools_community
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Builders
تُعد قناة Builders (@builders) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 3 840 028 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 23 في فئة العملات المشفرة والمرتبة 31 في منطقة دولي.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 3 840 028 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 10 يونيو, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -125 023، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -2 998، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: موثّقة (مؤكدة رسمياً من تيليجرام)
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 1.80%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً N/A% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 0 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 0 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 0.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“Telegram-native tools, open source & independent
tools.tg
@tools_community”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 11 يونيو, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة العملات المشفرة.
جاري تحميل البيانات...
| التاريخ | نمو المشتركين | الإشارات | القنوات | |
| 11 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 10 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 09 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 08 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 07 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 06 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 05 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 04 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 03 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 02 يونيو | 0 | |||
| 01 يونيو | 0 |
| 2 | Access: Recap
A lot has changed since the last snapshot.
More and more strong communities are choosing the tool to shape their groups.
Current stats:
– 2K active chats (+233%)
– 49K members connected (+96%)
Among the largest by asset value: Dogs Premium Holders, Pixel Strategy Whales, Snoop X BAYC Club, Groypers and $BUILD Diamond Hands.
Meanwhile, the technical side keeps evolving to make ownership verification stable and the flow seamless for both admins and members.
@builders | 0 |
| 3 | $BUILD is still in its early stage, where we are setting up contests for builders and shipping the first tools to the public.
The idea is to build an economy from real usage of valuable tools, similar to $HYPE and others (very few tho) that managed to create sustainable tokenomics.
At this stage, $BUILD have around 19k holders that got tokens via @earn, developer contests and the open market.
Once we prove the revenue -> buyback model works, we are going to shape the tokenomics which would actually work long term. Doing it too early might ruin the whole thing so we are not rushing with it.
For now, the best indicator of our progress is the consistency of launching contests, developing and shipping tools, and growing the user base, despite of the “bear market” and an overall silence across other projects in crypto, TON and Telegram | 0 |
| 4 | keep building 🫡 | 0 |
| 5 | Collab
A Telegram-native marketplace for buying and selling ads.
🔍 Discover channels or receive ad requests
💰 Secure payments with escrow
🎨 Approve and manage creatives
📊 Access verified Telegram stats
🤖 Automate posting and verification
Tool revenue supports the $BUILD ecosystem.
While the app is in development, the waitlist for channel owners is open
Add your channel, invite referrals and get early access with priority promotion and additional benefits.
@builders | 0 |
| 6 | Ads Marketplace Contest — Results & Insights
50+ submissions received.
We reviewed every entry: manual code review, product testing, and AI-assisted codebase analysis.
The spread was wide — from empty repos to solid MVPs.
Common issues we found:
1. Channel Stats
In our view, the best approach for channel analytics is MTProto’s method stats.getBroadcastStats — it gives you subscribers, avg views, Premium ratio, language breakdown, growth charts, all from one call. That said, we were open to other original solutions that could reliably deliver the same data — as long as the implementation was your own, not a call to an external analytics API.
In practice, most submissions claimed «verified channel stats» but only called getChatMemberCount via Bot API — which gives you subscriber count and nothing else.
2. Payments and Escrow
The most common area of weakness. Most projects did integrate with TON in some form, but the implementation quality varied a lot.
Some of the recurring issues:
– All deals sharing one wallet with no fund isolation — one security breach and everything is compromised
– Fund release and refund operations that aren’t safe to retry — if the service crashes mid-process, funds can be sent twice or never sent
– No locks or atomicity in background workers handling payments — race conditions leading to duplicate transactions
– Transaction verification that doesn’t actually check the blockchain
In general, any operation involving money needs to be designed for the worst case: crashes, retries, concurrent calls. This applies also to ad posting, not just escrow.
Some of these are understandable in an MVP context, but they still influenced how we evaluated the submissions.
3. Broken demos
Some demos weren’t functional, and self-deploy instructions were missing or incomplete. In those cases, hands-on product testing wasn’t conducted.
4. Overengineered Flows
Surprisingly common. Many projects added unnecessary complexity on top of the core deal flow – extra entities, extra verification steps, approval stages, duplicated logic. In some cases, both sides had to create separate entities before a deal could even start. Simpler would have been better.
5. AI-Generated Code Without Review
Nothing wrong with using AI as a development tool — most strong submissions did. The issue is when AI generates 90–100% of the code and no one reviews the result. Several projects had that pattern: boilerplate architecture, identical comments, extremely long and overcomplicated functions, code that doesn’t actually work when you run it. AI can speed things up significantly, but it shouldn’t fully replace the work of developer.
Thank you to everyone who participated — we appreciate the time and effort.
Even if you didn't win this time, we noticed your work.
Strong contributors stay on our radar for future opportunities, whether that's future contests or contributing to our open-source tools.
More news on the Ads Marketplace tool coming next week.
@builders
🌐 | 0 |
متاح الآن! بحث تيليغرام 2025 — أهم رؤى العام 
