现已上线！2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
Builders
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 Builders 的分析概览
频道 Builders (@builders) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 3 842 464 名订阅者，在 加密货币 类别中位列第 23，并在 国际 地区排名第 31 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 3 842 464 名订阅者。
根据 10 六月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -125 023，过去 24 小时变化为 -2 998，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 已认证（Telegram 官方确认）
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 1.80%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 N/A% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 0 次浏览，首日通常累积 0 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 0。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“Telegram-native tools, open source & independent
tools.tg
@tools_community”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 11 六月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 加密货币 类别中的关键影响点。
3 842 464
订阅者
-2 99824 小时
-31 1217 天
-125 02330 天
数据加载中...
吸引订阅者
六月 '26
六月 '260
在0个频道中
五月 '260
在2个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '260
在15个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '260
在1个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '260
在1个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '260
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '250
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '250
在7个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '250
在22个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '250
在17个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+68
在4个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+43
在1个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+48 964
在2个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+350
在8个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '250
在8个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '250
在10个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+3 134
在5个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+386
在181个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+92 895
在224个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+1 074 483
在16个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+202 130
在36个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+379 989
在32个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+1 977 206
在78个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+771 534
在38个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+891 533
在319个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+837 306
在91个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+102 210
在25个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+2 500 525
在42个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+329 044
在78个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+1 520 671
在47个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+30 073
在50个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+10 781
在68个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+74 211
在23个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 11 六月 | 0 | |||
| 10 六月 | 0 | |||
| 09 六月 | 0 | |||
| 08 六月 | 0 | |||
| 07 六月 | 0 | |||
| 06 六月 | 0 | |||
| 05 六月 | 0 | |||
| 04 六月 | 0 | |||
| 03 六月 | 0 | |||
| 02 六月 | 0 | |||
| 01 六月 | 0 |
频道帖子
Communities for Stickers
Access is now fully integrated with Sticker Pad. Launched a pack? Create a holder chat in one tap.
Already running:
– Aynami Rei (194 members)
– Not Wise :: Classics (110 members)
– Baron ICE GANG (495 members)
That's where the community lives. Go build yours.
Guide: how to create holder chat
🌐
| 2 |  Access: Recap
A lot has changed since the last snapshot.
More and more strong communities are choosing the tool to shape their groups.
Current stats:
– 2K active chats (+233%)
– 49K members connected (+96%)
Among the largest by asset value: Dogs Premium Holders, Pixel Strategy Whales, Snoop X BAYC Club, Groypers and $BUILD Diamond Hands.
Meanwhile, the technical side keeps evolving to make ownership verification stable and the flow seamless for both admins and members.
@builders | 0 |
| 3 | $BUILD is still in its early stage, where we are setting up contests for builders and shipping the first tools to the public.
The idea is to build an economy from real usage of valuable tools, similar to $HYPE and others (very few tho) that managed to create sustainable tokenomics.
At this stage, $BUILD have around 19k holders that got tokens via @earn, developer contests and the open market.
Once we prove the revenue -> buyback model works, we are going to shape the tokenomics which would actually work long term. Doing it too early might ruin the whole thing so we are not rushing with it.
For now, the best indicator of our progress is the consistency of launching contests, developing and shipping tools, and growing the user base, despite of the “bear market” and an overall silence across other projects in crypto, TON and Telegram | 0 |
| 4 | keep building 🫡 | 0 |
| 5 | Collab
A Telegram-native marketplace for buying and selling ads.
🔍 Discover channels or receive ad requests
💰 Secure payments with escrow
🎨 Approve and manage creatives
📊 Access verified Telegram stats
🤖 Automate posting and verification
Tool revenue supports the $BUILD ecosystem.
While the app is in development, the waitlist for channel owners is open
Add your channel, invite referrals and get early access with priority promotion and additional benefits.
@builders | 0 |
| 6 | Ads Marketplace Contest — Results & Insights
50+ submissions received.
We reviewed every entry: manual code review, product testing, and AI-assisted codebase analysis.
The spread was wide — from empty repos to solid MVPs.
Common issues we found:
1. Channel Stats
In our view, the best approach for channel analytics is MTProto’s method stats.getBroadcastStats — it gives you subscribers, avg views, Premium ratio, language breakdown, growth charts, all from one call. That said, we were open to other original solutions that could reliably deliver the same data — as long as the implementation was your own, not a call to an external analytics API.
In practice, most submissions claimed «verified channel stats» but only called getChatMemberCount via Bot API — which gives you subscriber count and nothing else.
2. Payments and Escrow
The most common area of weakness. Most projects did integrate with TON in some form, but the implementation quality varied a lot.
Some of the recurring issues:
– All deals sharing one wallet with no fund isolation — one security breach and everything is compromised
– Fund release and refund operations that aren’t safe to retry — if the service crashes mid-process, funds can be sent twice or never sent
– No locks or atomicity in background workers handling payments — race conditions leading to duplicate transactions
– Transaction verification that doesn’t actually check the blockchain
In general, any operation involving money needs to be designed for the worst case: crashes, retries, concurrent calls. This applies also to ad posting, not just escrow.
Some of these are understandable in an MVP context, but they still influenced how we evaluated the submissions.
3. Broken demos
Some demos weren’t functional, and self-deploy instructions were missing or incomplete. In those cases, hands-on product testing wasn’t conducted.
4. Overengineered Flows
Surprisingly common. Many projects added unnecessary complexity on top of the core deal flow – extra entities, extra verification steps, approval stages, duplicated logic. In some cases, both sides had to create separate entities before a deal could even start. Simpler would have been better.
5. AI-Generated Code Without Review
Nothing wrong with using AI as a development tool — most strong submissions did. The issue is when AI generates 90–100% of the code and no one reviews the result. Several projects had that pattern: boilerplate architecture, identical comments, extremely long and overcomplicated functions, code that doesn’t actually work when you run it. AI can speed things up significantly, but it shouldn’t fully replace the work of developer.
Thank you to everyone who participated — we appreciate the time and effort.
Even if you didn't win this time, we noticed your work.
Strong contributors stay on our radar for future opportunities, whether that's future contests or contributing to our open-source tools.
More news on the Ads Marketplace tool coming next week.
@builders
🌐 | 0 |
