Crypto Narratives
Ir al canal en Telegram
Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/ Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Crypto Narratives
El canal Crypto Narratives (@cryptonarratives1) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 21 600 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 5 261 en la categoría Criptomonedas y el puesto 1 826 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 21 600 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 25 agosto, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -63, y en las últimas 24 horas de -8, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 22.68%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 14.55% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 4 900 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 3 142 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 35.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como mstr, hype, chart, axs, eth.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/
Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain
Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 26 agosto, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Criptomonedas.
21 600
Suscriptores
-824 horas
Sin datos7 días
-6330 días
Archivo de publicaciones
21 600
+4
All the previous instances of pumps that were similar to the current one did resolve higher during this cycle
I'm betting on this time not being different
21 600
+2
Best major to use as a hedge short is XRP imo
It had a +70% squeeze after months of zombie price action
XRPBTC looks like a spike that is now already exhausted
21 600
By keeping STRC below par, the market is essentially forcing Saylor's hand into destroying bitcoin-per-share as well as making him unable to buy BTC
By creating a new "USD Cash" balance, he's now for the first time dipping his toes into explicit "market timing".
What he has done instead until now was basically buying BTC as soon as possible whenever he had cash, and then he was forced to de-lever (ie sell MSTR or BTC) at rather bad prices as a punishment for his fomo'ing at local highs.
The fact that he now has a USD Cash balance means he'll be able to try to time the market on his purchases and sales, which you can either see as good (if you think he'll be rather conservative) or catastrophically bad (considering his historical 'top blasting' urge)
https://x.com/saylor/status/2091859021456146659
21 600
Flipping your bias from bearish to bullish after you missed the opportunity of closing your shorts in profit is one of the hardest things to do
Psychological biases are the biggest enemies of the trader
21 600
LTF blow-off tops like that are often the signal for ALTBTC charts to shine, with BTC needing some time to consolidate after a giga-run
But it's even more bullish if BTC immediately goes up again
21 600
Reminder that BTC is a momentum asset, meaning it finds new buyers by going up
21 600
Lockout trend on BTC, chart looks like we'll have continuation before getting a pullback
21 600
$BTW is a $7bn FDV scam coin
When one of these appears, my question always is "can it reach the $20bn FDV club?"
Given the fact that the funding has been highly positive on that one, I'd say no.
Positive funding also implies that it's significantly less riskier to short, but there's always a risk of the funding rate flipping negative.
21 600
Congrats to Venice equity holders!
$VVV would be a no-brainer bid if there wasn't a token<>equity dual structure
But unfortunately there is one, and VVV is "only" buying back & burning $7M a year worth of tokens, against a $700M mcap and $40M annual emissions
https://x.com/ErikVoorhees/status/2089375845425287610
21 600
Unfortunately, Saylor is doubling down on his very bad idea to keep capping $STRC at $100.00
In his example, someone is shorting $10bn of STRC at $100 AND Strategy is able to keep issuing a ton of STRC at $100 at the same time, but that's not what's going to happen
Some people will be shorting a lot of STRC between $99 and $100, which will prevent the price from reaching $100 and incentivize holders to sell right below $100 too.
STRC not reaching $100 means Strategy has to keep deploying efforts and money to get it back to par, which in the current situation means selling BTC or MSTR at a 'low price' to buy STRC close to $100, ie the exact opposite of the trade he wants to do once STRC is at par.
The only thing that will push STRC decisively to $100 will be BTC pumping high enough, which also implies that when Saylor will be able to raise USD, BTC will be at a "high price" on a relative basis.
His reasoning is that he wants holders to be certain that STRC won't go above $100, which should reduce uncertainty and paralysis with regards to buying/selling STRC.
I think that's completely wrong because he's imagining that the ideal scenario will be STRC trading between $99 and $100, so he caps STRC at $100 to get closer to this idealistic scenario, but he doesn't realize that it's unrealistic and will never happen.
I's mathematically IMPOSSIBLE to reduce the volatility of STRC down to 1%, the volatility swings will always be around 10%, but now instead of having this volatility between $95 and $105, he's forcing it to be between $90 and $100.
So the holders will have the uncertainty/paralysis anyway, but they'll have it at a lower price and with a much worse r/r profile than if he didn't cap STRC at par.
I'm going to write a full article on this topic because it's important and I'm surprised he's doubling down on this.
https://x.com/TNorth/status/2089509833699369363
21 600
$SNDK is up +50% with basically zero drawdown
One could theoretically still argue that this is a dead cat bounce, but my opinion is instead that memory top callers are definitely going to be proven wrong
The easier trade that you could take with higher size is now done though, more than half the July sell-off has been retraced, levering up here is not the way to go
21 600
In trading, trying to make money too fast is the main reason you won't make money at all
21 600
Some unlocks starting soon apparently on $MON
More generally, as long as the market is dead, I don't really see why this wouldn't bleed down to $1bn FDV
(MEGA is already trading at $300M FDV...)
21 600
Pretty insane compression on $ZEC, I struggle to have a firm opinion on how this resolves
