Global Intel Watch
Ir al canal en Telegram
⚠️ Внимание: многие жаловались, что этот аккаунт выдаёт себя за официальный.
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Global Intel Watch
El canal Global Intel Watch (@geopoliticalblog) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 26 833 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 2 088 en la categoría Política y el puesto 1 447 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 26 833 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 12 febrero, 2025, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -603, y en las últimas 24 horas de 0, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 0%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener N/A% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 0 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 0 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“⚠️ Внимание: многие жаловались, что этот аккаунт выдаёт себя за официальный.”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 13 febrero, 2025), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Política.
26 833
Suscriptores
Sin datos24 horas
-1127 días
-60330 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
febrero '25
febrero '250
en 0 canales
enero '250
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '240
en 4 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+30
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '240
en 6 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+13
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+23
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+16
en 10 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+163
en 28 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+2 378
en 275 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+582
en 71 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+572
en 139 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+7 652
en 276 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+913
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+844
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+3 519
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+6 742
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+959
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+1 080
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+3 121
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+601
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+2 279
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+2 405
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+1 589
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '22
+2 951
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '22
+1 765
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '22
+7 098
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '22
+2
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '21
+3
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '21
+2
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '21
+6
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '21
+7
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '21
+9
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '21
+9
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '21
+25
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '21
+9
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '21
+541
en 0 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 11 febrero | 0 | |||
| 10 febrero | 0 | |||
| 09 febrero | 0 | |||
| 08 febrero | 0 | |||
| 07 febrero | 0 | |||
| 06 febrero | 0 | |||
| 05 febrero | 0 | |||
| 04 febrero | 0 | |||
| 03 febrero | 0 | |||
| 02 febrero | 0 | |||
| 01 febrero | 0 |
Publicaciones del Canal
Repost from Global Intel Watch
🇫🇷 - If the French state won’t help protect catholic churches from being burned, then I think catholics have a right to defend their heritage and to protect their churches. Its a god given right.
| 2 | 🇫🇷 - Edouard Philippe says running for president - Le Monde | 0 |
| 3 | 🇺🇸🇪🇺 - Someone like Trump or other strictly populist politicians in the West will never stop immigration because stopping or reducing legal immigration is something that has major economic consequences, and to handle such files you need highly competent politicians who are able to face headwinds and to have a clear plan.
More often than not, "No to immigration" is a slogan RW parties use but will never want to actually enforce because that would imply confronting the financial elite.
Thus, doctrinal clarity and consistency is needed. As is highly competent people that would be able to produce clear plans on how would Western economies change after a massive downscale of immigration. | 0 |
| 4 |  🇺🇸 - | 0 |
| 5 | 🇺🇸🇪🇺 - What I'm trying to explain is that being in a cold war requires a clear doctrine and a good sense of what causes unnecessary risks for the stability of the broader West.
No, the interests of a few arms manufacturers shouldn't force the West to refrain from doing the necessary scale up in arms manufacturing.
No, the fear of angering the rich shouldn't stop politicians from being cautious on austerity cycles because, you know, in a cold war context you need the population to support the current state of affairs and limit the possibility for growth of radical opposition. | 0 |
| 6 | Do you think Western govts, because of the situation of cold war, should be more cautious when doing austerity cycles to avoid potential backlash serving the interests of Eastern powers? | 0 |
| 7 | Should politicians tell private sector "Look, we’re in a cold war, it will be difficult during these years to just give you everything you want because we’ll have to balance it with national and Western interest"? | 0 |
| 8 |  🇷🇺🇺🇦 - Why wokeness doesn't work as a policy:
You have one guy arguing over the obvious fact that coexistence with Russia is necessary to avoid nuclear war, which is well established fact since decades.
Then, you have another guy that says "But you lack emotional awareness!" and tries to claim the higher ground. Not a journalist from some local MSM, not a politician from some center-right party: an academician.
That's why the West is losing: its trading reason for emotion. And emotion leads to bad policy making.
That's because people in charge are people from the middle class with comfort but little actual historical knowledge, and those type of people love having absurd ideas they know doesn't work because they have the luxury to. Take how middle class bourgeois in France always oppose any effort to increase security for the everyday man as an example.
The problem is that even them would be impacted in case of nuclear war. But I guess that would respect their emotions... right? | 0 |
| 9 | 🇪🇬🇪🇹🇺🇸 - I predict the West's policy on this will be balanced by
1) the fact they don't want Egypt to grow too powerful... because there is a neighbor that Egypt have that wouldn't necessarily agree to such a scenario 🇮🇱 so expect a limit on the level of intensity the West will agree too for a potential Egyptian win.
2) Mediatically, their own rhetoric would likely compel them to give at least some condemnation of Ethiopia's behavior. | 0 |
| 10 | 🇪🇬🇸🇴🇪🇹 - I have a lot of respect for Egypt and on paper they are favorite but they are pretty much untested as far as expeditionary war is concerned. My prediction is that the war will be up to Egyptian logistic officers to win. | 0 |
| 11 | Different question: Who do you expect to win such a conflict? | 0 |
| 12 | Who do you support? | 0 |
| 13 | What kind of GF would you want? | 0 |
| 14 | Was Trump protected by... | 0 |
| 15 | 🇺🇸🇷🇺 - If we take for granted that the formal abolishment of the right of conquest was is response to the rise mass ethnic cleansing during conquests, then the logical conclusion is that wars aiming to create puppet states constitute, in fact, a restoration of the right of conquest in its original sense, which means as a right to change the rulers, but not the peoples, of conquered territories. | 0 |
| 16 | 🇺🇸🇷🇺 - Regarding the right of conquest.
During the Cold War, the general rule was that the right of conquest was abolished. As always, there exceptions, notably in former Mandatory Palestine, in East Timor etc, but it was broadly respected.
After the end of the cold war, the exceptions to the general rule of the end of the right of conquest got a lot more frequent: Kosovo, the successive tacit partitions of Syria, Libya and Yemen following the end of their civil wars, Crimea, Iraq, Afghanistan and finally 2022 with Ukraine.
But why was the right of conquest abolished in the first place?
Before the industrial revolutions, war were mainly an elite things. Nobles were doing the fighting, even if as always civilians casualties existed.
This means that the impacts of any result of war and peace was mainly upon nobles and sometimes the clergy. However, when the industrial revolution hit, the masses got involved. There were the napoleonic wars, the US civil war, WW1 and then WW2 which had the draft. All of this meant that govts, if they wanted to survive the war effort, needed to justify the war to their population. Thus, nationalism got stronger and, in the end, it caused a lot more of ethnic cleansing and genocides.
And turns out that, when 1945 arrives, and the allied troops discover the concentration camps, there was an international outcry. First of all, there were only 2 major powers remaining, both of which were nominally anti-imperialist, and then, guess what, people were sick of war. Hence the formal legal abolition of the right of conquest. | 0 |
| 17 |  🇩🇪 - There was stuff going on in Germany today:
Bash in Berlin spoiler | 0 |
| 18 | Do you think any scenario where Ukraine doesn't recover its full territorial integrity at the end of the war would mean a de facto restoration of the Right of conquest, which was abolished after WW2? | 0 |
| 19 | Who had the most intense and self destructive ideological divisions... | 0 |
| 20 | 🇫🇷🇬🇧 - Obviously I don't actually support re-colonization, and the poll should be seen as more of a meme than anything else.
BUT
I do wonder if some level of increased Western oversight shouldn't be on the table for some Third World countries. Botched independence in the Third World has caused tremendous suffering to people out there who suffers from endless coups and civil wars. Even Edward Luttwak said that decolonization happened too soon.
Like, a country like Lebanon, if we're serious, like, couldn't some level of involvement by France's administration be a net plus? I'm just asking the question. | 0 |
