Machine Learning with Python
Learn Machine Learning with hands-on Python tutorials, real-world code examples, and clear explanations for researchers and developers. Admin: @HusseinSheikho || @Hussein_Sheikho
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Machine Learning with Python
El canal Machine Learning with Python (@codeprogrammer) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 67 819 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 2 404 en la categoría Educación y el puesto 5 049 en la región India.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 67 819 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 05 junio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 77, y en las últimas 24 horas de 9, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 2.60%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 2.50% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 767 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 1 695 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 6.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como insidead, learning, degree, evaluation, algorithm.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Learn Machine Learning with hands-on Python tutorials, real-world code examples, and clear explanations for researchers and developers.
Admin: @HusseinSheikho || @Hussein_Sheikho”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 06 junio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Educación.
from pydantic import BaseModel
class User(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
This example uses Pydantic to define a simple data model with validation rules. Cerberus, on the other hand, uses a dictionary-based approach to define validation rules.
from cerberus import Validator
schema = {
'name': {'type': 'string'},
'age': {'type': 'integer'}
}
v = Validator(schema)
Marshmallow is particularly useful for serializing and deserializing data, making it a good choice for working with APIs.
from marshmallow import Schema, fields
class UserSchema(Schema):
name = fields.Str()
age = fields.Int()
Pandera is designed specifically for validating pandas DataFrames, making it a good choice for data science and machine learning workflows.
import pandera as pa
schema = pa.DataFrameSchema({
'name': pa.Column(pa.String),
'age': pa.Column(pa.Int)
})
Great Expectations takes a more holistic approach to data validation, focusing on the expectations and constraints of the data rather than just the schema.
from great_expectations import DataContext
context = DataContext()
These libraries can be used in a variety of contexts, from simple data validation to complex data pipelines.
📌 Conclusion
In conclusion, the five Python data validation libraries discussed in this article can help ensure the accuracy and consistency of your data. By choosing the right library for your use case, you can simplify your data validation workflow and improve the reliability of your models. Whether you are working with APIs, DataFrames, or complex data pipelines, there is a library on this list that can help. #DataValidation #Python #DataScience #MachineLearning #DataQuality #DataIntegrity
🔗 Read more:
https://www.kdnuggets.com/5-python-data-validation-libraries-you-should-be-usingreversed() in Python - what supports it and what doesn't
The function reversed() is built-in in Python, but it doesn't work with all data types
✓ Lists - it works
reversed([1, 2, 3]) returns an iterator
list(reversed([1, 2, 3])) → [3, 2, 1]
✓ Tuples - it also works
reversed((1, 2, 3)) can be easily iterated
✗ Sets - not supported
reversed({1, 2, 3}) → TypeError
Why? Sets don't have a fixed order, so they can't be "reversed"
If you need to reverse a set:
list(reversed(list({1, 2, 3})))https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-with-the-anthropic-api▶️ Introduction to Model Context Protocol (MCP)
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/introduction-to-model-context-protocol▶️ Claude in Amazon Bedrock
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-in-amazon-bedrock▶️ Claude in Google Cloud (Vertex AI)
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-with-google-vertex▶️ Advanced MCP
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/model-context-protocol-advanced-topics▶️ Claude Code in Practice
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-code-in-actiontags: #courses #ai ➡ https://t.me/CodeProgrammer
if obj == None, use if obj is None
In Python, when you write:
obj == None
you're not directly checking if obj is the value None. Instead, you're asking if the object is equal to None.
Yes, in many cases, the result will be the same as for the code:
obj is None
But the behavior of these two variants is different, and this difference is important.
When you use:
obj == None
Python calls the __eq__ method on the object. That is, the object itself decides what it means to be "equal to None". And this method can be overridden.
If obj is an instance of a class in which __eq__ is implemented so that when compared with None, it returns True (even if the object is not actually None), then obj == None may mistakenly give True.
Example:
class Weird:
def __eq__(self, other):
return True # Always asserts that it's equal
obj = Weird()
print(obj == None) # True
print(obj is None) # False
Here, it can be seen that obj == None returns True due to the custom behaeqf the __eq__ operator in the class.
Therefore, when using obj == None, the result is not always predictable.
On the other hand, when you write:
obj is None
you're using the is operator, which cannot be overridden. This means that the result will always be the same and predictable.
The is operator checks the identity of objects, that is, whether two references point to the same object. Since None is a singleton (the only instance), obj is None is the correct and most efficient way to perform such a check.
❤️ Therefore, it is always recommended, and this is best practice, to use obj is None instead of obj == None for predictability and efficiency.
👉 https://t.me/DataScienceQ
¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
