Machine Learning with Python
Learn Machine Learning with hands-on Python tutorials, real-world code examples, and clear explanations for researchers and developers. Admin: @HusseinSheikho || @Hussein_Sheikho
Ko'proq ko'rsatish📈 Telegram kanali Machine Learning with Python analitikasi
Machine Learning with Python (@codeprogrammer) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 67 819 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Taʼlim toifasida 2 404-o'rinni va Hindiston mintaqasida 5 049-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 67 819 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
05 Iyun, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 77 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa 9 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 2.60% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 2.50% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 1 767 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 1 695 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 6 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent insidead, learning, degree, evaluation, algorithm kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Learn Machine Learning with hands-on Python tutorials, real-world code examples, and clear explanations for researchers and developers.
Admin: @HusseinSheikho || @Hussein_Sheikho”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 06 Iyun, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Taʼlim toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
from pydantic import BaseModel
class User(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
This example uses Pydantic to define a simple data model with validation rules. Cerberus, on the other hand, uses a dictionary-based approach to define validation rules.
from cerberus import Validator
schema = {
'name': {'type': 'string'},
'age': {'type': 'integer'}
}
v = Validator(schema)
Marshmallow is particularly useful for serializing and deserializing data, making it a good choice for working with APIs.
from marshmallow import Schema, fields
class UserSchema(Schema):
name = fields.Str()
age = fields.Int()
Pandera is designed specifically for validating pandas DataFrames, making it a good choice for data science and machine learning workflows.
import pandera as pa
schema = pa.DataFrameSchema({
'name': pa.Column(pa.String),
'age': pa.Column(pa.Int)
})
Great Expectations takes a more holistic approach to data validation, focusing on the expectations and constraints of the data rather than just the schema.
from great_expectations import DataContext
context = DataContext()
These libraries can be used in a variety of contexts, from simple data validation to complex data pipelines.
📌 Conclusion
In conclusion, the five Python data validation libraries discussed in this article can help ensure the accuracy and consistency of your data. By choosing the right library for your use case, you can simplify your data validation workflow and improve the reliability of your models. Whether you are working with APIs, DataFrames, or complex data pipelines, there is a library on this list that can help. #DataValidation #Python #DataScience #MachineLearning #DataQuality #DataIntegrity
🔗 Read more:
https://www.kdnuggets.com/5-python-data-validation-libraries-you-should-be-usingreversed() in Python - what supports it and what doesn't
The function reversed() is built-in in Python, but it doesn't work with all data types
✓ Lists - it works
reversed([1, 2, 3]) returns an iterator
list(reversed([1, 2, 3])) → [3, 2, 1]
✓ Tuples - it also works
reversed((1, 2, 3)) can be easily iterated
✗ Sets - not supported
reversed({1, 2, 3}) → TypeError
Why? Sets don't have a fixed order, so they can't be "reversed"
If you need to reverse a set:
list(reversed(list({1, 2, 3})))https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-with-the-anthropic-api▶️ Introduction to Model Context Protocol (MCP)
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/introduction-to-model-context-protocol▶️ Claude in Amazon Bedrock
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-in-amazon-bedrock▶️ Claude in Google Cloud (Vertex AI)
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-with-google-vertex▶️ Advanced MCP
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/model-context-protocol-advanced-topics▶️ Claude Code in Practice
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/claude-code-in-actiontags: #courses #ai ➡ https://t.me/CodeProgrammer
if obj == None, use if obj is None
In Python, when you write:
obj == None
you're not directly checking if obj is the value None. Instead, you're asking if the object is equal to None.
Yes, in many cases, the result will be the same as for the code:
obj is None
But the behavior of these two variants is different, and this difference is important.
When you use:
obj == None
Python calls the __eq__ method on the object. That is, the object itself decides what it means to be "equal to None". And this method can be overridden.
If obj is an instance of a class in which __eq__ is implemented so that when compared with None, it returns True (even if the object is not actually None), then obj == None may mistakenly give True.
Example:
class Weird:
def __eq__(self, other):
return True # Always asserts that it's equal
obj = Weird()
print(obj == None) # True
print(obj is None) # False
Here, it can be seen that obj == None returns True due to the custom behaeqf the __eq__ operator in the class.
Therefore, when using obj == None, the result is not always predictable.
On the other hand, when you write:
obj is None
you're using the is operator, which cannot be overridden. This means that the result will always be the same and predictable.
The is operator checks the identity of objects, that is, whether two references point to the same object. Since None is a singleton (the only instance), obj is None is the correct and most efficient way to perform such a check.
❤️ Therefore, it is always recommended, and this is best practice, to use obj is None instead of obj == None for predictability and efficiency.
👉 https://t.me/DataScienceQ
Endi mavjud! Telegram Tadqiqoti 2025 — yilning asosiy insaytlari 
