KR

If you could fabricate letters in the Quran like ملك اليوم الدين, what else is there to say? Barefaced liar

This guy is a fail at all levels

He looks like a failed Darul Ulum student, who flipped to Salafism so he could promote his nonsense in those circles unhindered

This guy is an all-round disaster. I wonder how he has the gall to publish his rubbish

Grand mufti 😁

مالك اليوم الدين Amazing

He can't even write it properly. مالك اليوم الدين

If he can't remember Surat al Fatiha, could he not check a mushaf? Surely, he must have one in the midst of all those books he doesn't know how to read.

#neverforget ... Because I told you this [الدين] is a sifah [of اليوم]... This [الدين] is something that describes this [اليوم], so it's a sifah, and the sifah has to follow the i'rab of what it's describing - the mawsuf. Tayyib? Tayyib.

This guy's i'rab is a head-on collision trainwreck in an earthquake followed by a tsunami https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLgOxX04hXs&t=1891s There are so many errors here one might conclude this guy is actually an enemy of Arabic. Some lowlights: - The word امرئ is amr - Doesn't know the i'rab of ما نوى - Doesn't know the i'rab of يصيبها - Doesn't know the i'rab of يتزوجها - Error in the translation of إنما - Purposefully says الدنيا instead of دنيا - multiple times - Incorrectly claims إلى دنيا is khabar - Ignorantly reads يتزوجَها

He might have said أصحى الكتاب بعد كتاب الله The most woke book after the Book of Allah add.: Even then, it should be أسهل الكتب or أصحى الكتب, to make it grammatically legible even though the meaning is totally wrong, not أسهل الكتاب / أصحى الكتاب . When this guy commits errors, it's a downpour.

صحيح البخاري أسهل كتاب بعد كتاب الله It is indeed very easy if you've never read it.

Some Ahnaf are secretly gagging for their concocted Hanafi Hadith Method to be critiqued by some Orientalist or random deviant, so that they enjoy a sense of validation for their parasitic method and can turn their knives to them in order to give it a new lease of life. Right now, their knives are pointed only at the actual Muhaddithun - and they don’t know whom else to point them at. It’s an identity and methodological crisis in the noble science of Hadith they just cannot resolve.

I don't know about you, but if I was going to write about hukm bi-ghayr ma anzal Allah, I would definitely want to get an introduction from Dhiyab al Ghamidi, as he has previously demonstrated a profound command for the subtleties of this topic.

https://apps.apple.com/app/id1606318923 With full audio lessons. Makes sense for those who want to convert to Thuluth script or those starting out.

قال الشيخ حاتم العوني: إنّما برزَ مصطلحُ 'الفكر الإسلاميّ' ووصفُ 'المفكّر الإسلاميّ' عندما جمدَ الفقهُ الإسلاميّ، وانعزلَ عن الواقع، بل صادمَ الواقع. وإلّا فالفقيهُ حقًّا هو المفكّرُ الإسلاميّ صدقًا! فلم يظهرْ علينا ذلك المصطلحُ الجديد إلّا لمّا غابَ عن الفقهِ تجدُّدُه وتعايشُه مع الواقع. فلا تلومُوا مَن وَجدُوا في وصفِ المفكّرِ الإسلاميّ ما لم يَجِدُوه فيمَن تَسَمَّوا بالفقهاء، لأنّ أكثرَ مَن يظنُّهم الناسُ فقهاء ليسوا فقهاء، وإنّما هُم حملةُ فقهٍ.

I have seen Dr Akram Nadwi visiting the Ghamdi Center in Dallas and his photo with various individuals, including Ghamdi, his protoge, and YQ. I have read the explanation for his attendance in detail. I have defended him in the past. On this occasion, however, it is unfortunately unconvincing and not reassuring. Part of our faith is to voice disagreement even if it is to those whom you deeply respect. Dr Akram falls under that category of indviduals for me. So it pains me to say that this - in the very public and religious context that it was in - is not something any rational scholar or student should support. There is something called boundaries. May Allah keep us all steadfast, آمين.