en
Feedback
Nox venator

Nox venator

Closed channel

في وَحدةِ الانكفاء وَحدةُ اقتران.

Show more
470
Subscribers
No data24 hours
No data7 days
No data30 days
Posts Archive
photo content

International salafism failed because, except for it’s jihadist-universalist constitution, because it established a referential dependance upon the saudi’s dictated orientations, and thus they deprived their selfhoods of individuated sovereignty, and were thus minimised essentially to being intermediary apparatuses of a pragmatic-utilitarian statehood which they categorically designated as a quasi-infallible central entity of their comprehensive nomos The european far-right is simulating the same pattern with russia, whose calculative-utilitarianism exceeds in it’s modalistic totality that of the saudi’s, and even more terrifying, as the russians would not refrain from engulfing europe to a funeral pyre to re-assert the separative spatiality from their “heartland” whose existential boundaries are instantiated in finality in poland and austria and bulgaria “slavophile respublika orthodoxa” , and from that a tellurocratic hell shall be erected with a concealing darkness extending to the rhine The ontology of the “Cartesian dasein” fused with Michael Moorcock’s “chaos as a primordial potency of creative instantiation” is not a conceptual apparatus which can be delegated to an entity proclaiming “cohesive friendship” in the paradigmatic structure of a “multipolarity” These are the metaphysics not of platonic monadism forms or even the so nominally designated “ perennial traditionalism” , those are the metaphysics of attributing a ontological authentic originality to contingent multiplicity, metaphysics of deathness of the intellective spirit and it’s intrinsic dispositional alignment, in which the gestell of degeneracy is adsorptively integrated
“Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.“
Yet the contemporary european, in his unrelenting desperation, is like a camel whose thirst shall incentivise his optical receptors to regard every murky sludge as a gracious oasis .

photo content

What is more audaciously insolent in the context of abhorrent transgressions against sophistication conceptualisations than to consider one’s own teleological desirability is to equip them in attribution to the un-contemplative recipient , that of the assertive conformity of the primitively unrefined selfhood with their thematic encompassing totality?

وعَلى كُلٍ، فريدريخ اصبح مَحطة ملاذ لجوء لكل مُنحط سافِل يُريد ان يُعزز نزعاته الوجدانية الناتجة عن استشعاره للقهر الخُضوعي ويَنبثق من خلالها الى هيدونية سَفيهة قد تَكون بمُضاجعة الذات مزاجيا قَبل الغير حيث الاوبيرمينش اصبح مُجرد عَبد للنزعات الوجدانية او التَقلبات المزاجية او الغرائِز الطبائِعية.

مفهوم الشَر العَدمي لا يَصح ثيولوجيا مع الاديان الابراهيمية، فهذا مفهوم افلاطوني قائم على اساس ان موناد هيليوس هو الوُجود المُطلق {وليس الكلي} ، بالتالي تجليات المُثل الفَيضية اقتضاء منه في الدرجات الدُنيا تتذبذب استعداديا تبعا لقُربها النِسبي من العَدم الكُلي اوغسطين استدخل هذا الاعتبار لان عنده الاينيرجياس الثالوثية قائمة على اساس الحُب بين الهايپوستاسيس المُتعالي {مدري هاي ثيولوجيا لو دراما مكسيكية} لكنه مُكافح بنصوص العَهد القديم التي تُصرح بوضوح ان ياهويه ابتغى اراديا تَخليق الشَر، وهذا متوافق مع مفهوم كون العِلة الاولى ذات عقلائِية بالتالي لها سُلطة تسيُدية بالتالي استخدام وتوظيف هذا المفهوم اسلاميا ومسيحيا هو من ارهاصات خسارة الاصالة العُنفوانية للابراهيمية على انها {نِد للوُجود التعددي في المراتِب السببية} وضمن الكثير من العقلنات الارتجالية التي فرضتها اللوگوس الاپولينية على النَزعة الماجِية {باصطلاح اوسوالد سپينگلير}

تعالي حبيبي "النيتشوي" اصدمك ما وراء الخير والشر (Jenseits von Gut und Böse), §251 “اليهود هم بلا شكّ أقوى وأصلب وأنقى الأعراق الموجودة اليوم في أوروبا.” („Die Juden sind ohne jeden Zweifel das stärkste, zäheste und reinste Geschlecht, das in Europa lebt.“) المصدر: KSA 5, S. 198. ما وراء الخير والشر, §250 “ما الذي تدين به أوروبا لليهود؟ أشياء كثيرة، حسنة وسيئة، وأهمّها شيء يجمع بين الخير والشر: الأسلوب العظيم في الأخلاق، الرهبة والعظمة في المطالب اللامتناهية والمعاني اللامتناهية.” („Was Europa den Juden verdankt? – Vieles, Gutes und Böses, und vor allem eins von der Art des Besten und des Schlimmsten: den großen Stil in der Moral, die Furchtbarkeit und Majestät unendlicher Forderungen …“) المصدر: KSA 5, S. 197–198. ضدّ المسيح (Der Antichrist), §24 “إنّ اليهود هم أكثر الشعوب جدارة بالإعجاب في تاريخ العالم، لأنهم، وهم في أسوأ الظروف، لم يكفّوا عن تأكيد وجودهم، ولم يضحّوا بكيانهم في سبيل رغبات الانتقام والعدم.” („Die Juden sind das merkwürdigste Volk der Weltgeschichte, weil sie, gestellt in die schlechtesten Bedingungen, nie aufgehört haben, ihr Dasein zu bejahen …“) المصدر: KSA 6, S. 189. في أصل الأخلاق (Zur Genealogie der Moral), المقالة الأولى §7 “كلّ جهود العالم ضدّ النبلاء، الأقوياء، أصحاب السلطة، لا تساوي شيئاً مقارنة بما أنجزه اليهود ضدّهم … اليهود، ذلك الشعب الكهنوتي، استطاع أخيراً أن يفرض قيمه على أعدائه ومنغّصيهم.” („Alle Weltanstrengungen gegen die Aristokraten, die Mächtigen, die Herrscher, sind im Vergleich zu dem, was die Juden gegen sie getan haben … die Juden, dieses priesterliche Volk … konnten letzten Endes nur durch eine radikale Umwertung der Werte Genugtuung gegenüber ihren Feinden und Bezwingern erlangen.“) المصدر: KSA 5, S. 117–118. رسائل نيتشه إلى أصدقاءه 1887 “سيُنظر إليّ على أنني مناهض لليهود، في حين أنه لا يوجد أحد يعارض هذه الحركة أكثر مني.” („Es wird mein Schicksal sein, als Antisemit zu gelten – während in Wirklichkeit niemand dieser Art von Bewegung radikaler entgegensteht als ich.“) المصدر: Nietzsche: Briefe, KSA 8, S. 389.

Voice message02:13

Voice message06:03

حول نيتشة:

a women intrinsically or hysterically restrained and confiend from a being a vehicular agency of erotic promiscuousness indic
a women intrinsically or hysterically restrained and confiend from a being a vehicular agency of erotic promiscuousness indicated mechanical artificialism , and an absence of spiritual exuberant vividness as a substantive multitude And thus she become the indicative actuality of civilisational exhaustion of vigorous virility and heedful openness toward Being Yet if this is not regulated by the archetypal femininity of passive cohesion, she degenerates into rudimentary profanity, an absence of enframing essence Thus she become of no compatible reconciliation with he immutable natural dynamic synthesis .

a women intrinsically or hysterically restrained and confiend from a being a vehicular agency of erotic promiscuousness indic
a women intrinsically or hysterically restrained and confiend from a being a vehicular agency of erotic promiscuousness indicated mechanical artificialism , and an absence of spiritual exuberant vividness as a substantive multitude And thus she become the indicative actuality of civilisational exhaustion of vigorous virility and heedful openness toward Being Yet if this is not regulated by the archetypal femininity of passive cohesion, she degenerates into rudimentary profanity, an absence of enframing essence Thus she become of no compatible reconciliation with he immutable natural dynamic synthesis .

In the confrontational struggle against the technical enflaming of the technical nihilist , only the arbitrary seeks sheltering refuge in collective primitivism , rather, the transcendent aspires to the pure immutability of the form, and from it’s divine daemon can there only be organic authenticity not only of the configured form, but of the cultivatable substantiveness

The sophisticated eloquence of a politician is an indicative variable which is profound , it is the exhibitive proclamation of systematic organisation and perceptual cognition of the selfhood and the alternate , and it’s absence indicates plebeian nihilism, and the concealment of the constituent actuality of reality from the perspectival capacity The rhetorical eloquence or it’s degeneration are what dictates if the language and it’s possessor are the sheltering refuge and the house of Being, or it’s abandonment and slaughter house. Sophisticated eloquence is unfit for plebeian democracy, as it demands a prior cohesive silence and a heedful attentiveness to what is to be thought in the process of proclaimed utterance , and the contemporary democracy demands a continuous becoming of polluting noises which bombard the eagerly receptive ear of the voter with the sensation of grounded authenticity through arbitrary puritanical animosity, a process which exhibits how the contemporary technical man is ardently dedicated to attribute his influx nihilism of aesthetic dramatics under a sensation of willing-to-will “Das eigentliche Sagen ist aus dem Schweigen geboren. Nur wer gehört hat, kann sagen.“ — Martin Heidegger, Unterwegs zur Sprache, p. 161 (GA 12)

photo content

“White segregated settlements” in “abomerika” are an awkward phenomenon, collective identities are not artificially synthesises as the machined and perceptible teleological desirability, rather they are given an organic gelassenheit, in which a collective identity assert’s it’s absorptive-acquisitive capacity in accordance to it’s historiological cyclicalism, then it pursue a magian or Apollonian or Faustian form of existential logos, or an intermediate moderation or a derivative alteration, such projects are doomed to inevitable faluire , for they are retrospectively modernist, and they cannot endure without the sustainablity of modernity, and their respective confinement cannot fulfil the prerequisites of this intrinsic modernity embedded in it’s archetypal amalgamation + structurally their koine is tribalistic-fraternities, and no “social” can be established from their individualised racialism , not even the apparatus of the nuclear family can fulfill it And any tribalism will not be enabled to endure the anthropological reality Neither are they with the Heraclitian-influx, nor the Parmenidian alethia, nor platonic archtypal transcendentalism { capacity for the acquisition of the alien as between the naroods} And history hysterically laughs .

The absurdist nihilism of contemporary deregulated neo-liberal capitalism coerces dialectical marxism to be correspondingly correct not as a historic-hermeneutic, but as i humanstic phenomenology .

“Know that my protective armor is the mobilization of my defiance to the wretched fiend Yet neigh compromising the fairness of my perception. And that my sword is the surmounted contemptuousness of my absolutist adversary, without it depriving cognised compassion from my heart. And that my dagger lies in the exertion of my struggling rootdness , With no permit towards expending the vigor robustness of my corpus. And know that any enemy who extinguishes his disciplinary cohesion by abandoning his own nobility in pursuit of temporal victory, has inflicted upon himself encompassing defeat and lost sight of the eternal triumphant.

an american conservative , what ever his conceptual substance or his doctrinal orientation maybe, repetitively degenerates unto a technical-mechanical beast, as is embedded in the constitutive fabric of his historic world-Being, and thus, I would prefer with a fervent dignity any dialectical communist and establish a fraternal association with him over a billion of these amalgamated historiological abhorrences.

“AMERIKA IST, WENN DIE PRIVATEN MÄCHTE DER WIRTSCHAFT FREIE BAHN FÜR IHRE EROBERUNG GROßER VERMÖGEN WOLLEN. KEINE GESETZGEBUNG SOLL IHNEN IM WEGE STEHEN. SIE WOLLEN DIE GESETZE SELBST MACHEN, IN IHREM INTERESSE, UND SIE BEDIENEN SICH DAZU EINES SELBSTGESCHAFFENEN WERKZEUGS, DER DEMOKRATIE, DER BEZAHLTEN PARTEI.“
— OSWALD SPENGLER, DER UNTERGANG DES ABENDLANDES, BAND II