470
Subscribers
No data24 hours
No data7 days
No data30 days
Posts Archive
470
Ends do not justify the means, or may do, irrelevant
For there is a preliminary domain which is phenomenologically concealed
The procedural patterns are not mere intermediary vehicles, but are active causative agents in the constitution of the intuitive mentality by which perspectival inclinations through which a teleological purpose is dictated , for a an abundant shedder of blood rarely can confined his indulgence, as this procedural reality demands a continual embrace of it’s abnormally alien essence, and the only adequate sustainer of sanity amidst it’s seismic waves is a sentimental tendency which emanates from the circumstantial predicaments forged by the process, and there a transformative degeneration occurs
for humans since the initial precedents of their governance upon existence have possessed an insatiable appetite for a singular elementary force , that of existential legitimacy
And he who wields a particular blade in protracted extension shall desire to absorptively integrate it into his own Being’s identity , for humans are beings of participatory relationality
So the the adequate inquisition should be not “do ends justify the means”
But , by which sophisticated trickery against our fragile susceptibility can we established a shielded fortitude from the intermediary tool absorbing is into it’s necessitated sentimental inclinations, how can we not relinquish our dominion over a instrument and be protectively guaranteed from it’s causative discursiveness ?
How can we be cast into the image of deranged criminality while preserving seperativness from it’s illicitly imperceptible inclination, let alone retrospective conceptualisation of a reality in which we are identitarianly grounded in nihilistic absurdism ?
What robust tenacity is that such immutable fortitude is required ?
470
The most perspectively encompassing form of Being is not that of ecstatic euphoria upon the rudimentary profanity of the satiation of instinctual tendencies with processes of redundant repetition of the sameness , a modality of a singular instance artificially perpetuated in temporal extension, but is that of navigating the voyage of the unpredictable worldliness of providential destiny and it’s seismic waves , for transcendent men do not submissively capitulate to it’s timid stagnancy , but with robust vehemence bring henceforth to it the tranquil instantiation of principles of Being through which the whims of eternity are traversed , endowing substance with essence , bringing Being unto relative latency and bleak potentiality, in which the mere act of authentic voyage is a theurgic litany of engulfing exuberance not deprived of cognitive virtue and intuitive conception .
470
{"تامل النجوم البعيدة معي، رُبما تَقع عيننا على {تيرا} من بينها ، ذَلك الكوكب الذي يُتناقل توارُثاً سردُ حكايةِ اننا استقدمنا انفسنا مَنه، لكن ما قيمةُ المصدر الاصلي ان لَم نَعُد نتعاطى مَعه؟ ، حتى لو امتلكتُ القدرة على ان استعيدَ تواصُلنا معه، حتى لو كان ذلك ليستوفي عطش الانتماء الذي يتغلغل فينا، فساعرض بضراوة عن ذَلك، اذ من الافضل ان تُشكل بيئة انتماء جديدة لنا و سيطرة سيادية على مُجريات تشكُلها وان كانت جُزئية، افضل من ان نُقيد بنواتِج تاريخٍ لم نُساهم في تَشكيله من قَبيلِ المفاهيم الاعتباطية والنزعات العاطفية التي شكلوها، انه لمن الافضل باطلاق بان يُنطلق من الصفر المَحض بَدل المُناورةِ في بَحر انتماءِ لا تُعلم لا شوائِبُه ولا محدوديات سواحِله ولا اعماقُ قعره، ولو كان هنالك مبدئ كوني ، فسيكون متجذرا في الواقع وسنتوصَل اليه باستقلاليةٍ عن ما يُشتق من تاريخِ الاف السنين من اندافعية الانسان"}
~ أبو إيزيكيل بن نيوث الكاليباني، لايون إِيل جونسون ،پرايمارك إيل أنجيليكوس مورتيس.
470
Political philosophy with no metaphysical groundedness is the phenomenology of administrative nihilism and the ontology of causative dissonance, and that is the most grievous transgression of Schmitt.
470
A statehood deprived of a principle of sovereign governance in anticipatory legality can with men of procedural acuteness instantiate an improvisational augmentation and adaptatively endure , yet a statehood with no henadic transcendentalism is condemned to mere temporal contingency , and a statehood whose being emanates not with the rays of eternal immutability cannot causally substantiate it’s claim to the heraldry of absolutist sovereignty, for it’s fragile mortality is it’s ontological essence , and thus it shall relinquish the absoluteness of it’s categorical dictate in the organic distinction of the consolidated qualitativeness of the most primordial act of assertive governability, that of war , for how can a atomist fragment subservient in origination to circumstances proclaim it’s emergence as an absolutist mitigator of it’s providential destiny ?
If the statehood resembled no fragment of instantiated divinity, then it is a state whose finality is embedded in it’s essential identity .
470
Misguided in bleakness is he who fallaciously asserts that the fairness of justice is actualised by recursive organicity
And decadently abhorrent is he who refrained in adamance from carving it tangible immutability upon the wretched wickedness with letters whose illuminating litany is that of vehement terror
For the tranquil serenity is bought by a constraint of finitude inflicted beyond the cognitive desirability of it’s mitigator .
470
Morphological monotheism and the defiance of corporeal anthropomorphism of the gods “as henadic participatory congregators of Being rather than individualised pantheons” not only in theological transcendentalism but also ritualistic theurgy did not begin only in Jerusalem and Mecca
But in Athens
470
Damascius regarded sight-observing as a intuitive theurgic practice in it’s selfhood , it begets tranquil solitude with no alienated insulation, a divine mystery, imperceptible yet intelligible
470
The most degrading blight of man is his ardent refusal to comprehend that his finitude prohibits him from possessing a cognitive perception of all that is intelligible , incapable of not reducing existence to mere manipulable category, the perception not of corresponding cognition, but that of taking man’s hysteric paranoia as a microcosm and projecting it unto existence as a macrocosm , a evil inversion of platonism
A world deprived of platonic virtuous cognition , and deprived of the ecstatic temporality of the übermensch, an inverted structure of the magian and the maximised directionlessness of faust .
470
الهايدگريين يحاولون يمثلون مصداقيا الگيلاسينهايت والتَحرُر من قولبة التَقننة الي تقلب الوُجود من تعددية امكانيات اقترانية الى تأطُر استغلالية بمُقتضى الانتهاز المُباشر والدنيا محترگ عرض عرضها بخريط نيك لاند والپوست-هيومانست*
زيزيك على الصَفحة المُغايرة:
470
احترگت لشتك دومزيل من يوم بديت تخرط بسوالف ال comparative-mythology {ولو الرَجُل تراجع عنها كُليا قبل مماته بكُتبه الاخيرة واستوعب كمية الاعتباط التَخميني الي فيها}
470
Iamblichus in De Mysteriis:
“Those who imagine the divine craves human death misunderstand the nature of the cosmos.”
Enneads IV.4.6:
“That which is divine within man cannot be offered as a commodity to the gods; they ask not for violence but for contemplation.”
Porphyry
“Ceremonies that require the blood of the living are marks not of piety, but of ignorance of the true divine.”
Porphyry , Letter to Anebo
“Those who shed human blood think they honor the divine; rather, they reveal ignorance of the One, who desires reason and virtue, not slaughter.”
Proclus Elements of Theology §11:
“The first principle of the Good is incorruptible; therefore, acts that destroy rational beings offend the natural order.”
Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus:
“Rituals should aim at the purification and ascent of the soul. To destroy life in the hope of pleasing the gods is a misapprehension of divine nature.”
Were these Neoplatonist christian slave-morality propagators ?
Lmao
470
Just so you comprehend the inauthentic larping of the “pagan reconstructists”
His proclamation regarding the disdainful contempt of human sacrifices emanating purely from subjective-sentimentalism of christian morality “the misinterpretation of Nietzsche rears it’s preposterous ugly head again” is firstly an indicative variable of the metaphysical inauthenticity and the superstition absurdity of these aesthetic larpers , and i mean inauthenticity here as constituting the orianted conceptualisations in accordance to what is in irreconcilable incompatibility of the previous elementary domain “christianity” rather than a independent systemised apparatuses whose substantive constitution emenated from their axiomatic prioris and subsidiary elements directly, and secondly it is laughably ironic , when we consider the culminating pinnacle of the hellenic metaphysical tradition
470
Syndicalist fascism is far closer to the organically authentic conception of nation than the german national socialist slop
A national statehood embodying the coherent communal Geist and cognitive impulse in which individuality is elevated beyond fragmented atomist is transcendentally superior to the biological determinism of the inferiority complex prevailing over the calculative-materialism of the nazi absurdities of pseudoscientific rhetorical plebeianism combined with sentimental victimhood .
470
Anthropomorphic misprojection unto the technical intrinsic finitude and it’s exhaustive discursiveness
Technical capacities have a finitude imbedded in the conceptual substratum of the instruments themselves
For approximative elucidation , battle ships reached their conclusive finalities after the establishment of aircraft militaristic doctrines of synchronous air bombardment, thus the fundamental concept of a battle ship was rendered obsolete by the relational reality of tactical feasibility and it’s own nature
Add to that phone, phones have in practicality reached the conclusive finality of their capacities in regard to their primary substance , and all the innovations are now marginally subsidiary , for further elucidation, a camera cannot get any clearer in a distinguishably utilitarian sense , yet their zoom can
Thus phone have simply reached their finalities as a concept
Now add to that AI
An industrial automation of comprehensive totality encompassing serial task-sequences is fundamentally futile
As AI’s algorithmic-representational capacities are confined to linguistic-descriptive modalities, and productive automation require spatial perceptuality and circumstantial improvisation which AI is structurally incapable of
Yet the delusion of the normative observer and even the capitalist investor emanates from their perception of AI as an individuated selfhood , thus they equate it with the multiplicity of possibilities permitted by the individuated selfhoods of humans , which is a phenomenological-ontological error at essence
Technologies start with the capacity for the fulfilment of unprecedented utilities , then they culminate with complementary efficiency with the culmination of the improvement of subsidiary characteristics , then reach the finality of functional saturation, then plummet into finitude when the human audacity attempts to delegate functionalities external to the apparatus’s nature for it to fulfill.
470
99.999% of populist science and the subsequent grotesque ideological tendencies emerging from it is based on the quantitive-representational form rather than qualitative-systemisation of empiricism, and they fall for it like herded sheep whose perceptions are manipulatively fractured, simply because people are fucking idiots and do not desire to study metaphysical epistemology.
