⚡️⚡️Truth Seekers⚡️⚡️

Subscribe to our backup channel in case anything was to ever happen to this one. Thank you to everyone for helping us get to 2600 subscribers here. https://t.me/NSDAPLovedChrist2

“Except for the Fascist revolution in Italy, no other similar kind of historical action can compare to the National Socialist endeavour in its internal discipline and order.” -Adolf Hitler (1933)

"As to the attitude towards the Church — the Führer's attitude was a generous one, at the beginning absolutely generous. I should not like to say that it was positive in the sense that he himself was a positive or convinced adherent of any one confession, but it was generous and positive in the sense that he recognized the necessity of the Church. Although he himself was a Catholic, he wished the protestant Church to have a stronger position in Germany, since Germany was two-thirds Protestant. ⟨...⟩ With the Catholic Church the Fuhrer ordered a concordat to be concluded by Herr (Franz) Von Papen. Shortly before that agreement concluded by Herr Von Papen I visited the Pope myself. I had numerous connections with the higher Catholic clergy because of my Catholic mother, and thus — I am myself a Protestant —I had a view of both camps." — Hermann Göering, Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal ("Blue Series"): Volume 9 @SSTruthSeekersSS

Hitler receiving the sabre of Charlemagne in Nuremberg (1938) On the orders of Adolf Hitler, the imperial relics were brought to Nuremberg in 1938, where they were displayed in the Katharinenkloster. During the Second World War they were stored in the Historischer Kunstbunker to protect them from aerial bombardment. The Imperial regalia were found there by American soldiers in 1945 and returned to the Hofburg in 1946.

What is a Crypto-communist? A crypto-communist is either an individual or an ideology that indirectly advocates for Marxian socialism and/or Stalinist totalitarianism. Many of the proponents of this category outwardly claim to be opposing Communism but inwardly they're merely pawns for the former USSR. Prominent examples of this category include but are not limited to: - National Anarchists - Anarcho-syndicalists - Revolutionary-type Socialists - Strasserists & Eurasianists - Maoists & National Bolsheviks - Sorelianists - Stalinists & Russia supporters - etc. These types all have the same end goal: advancing communism through deceiving Nationalists by means of the veils listed previously. A wise suggestion would be to blacklist every sort of these types and their affiliates immediately. @SSTruthSeekersSS

The Birth of Neo-Paganism in the USSR “In the Soviet period, this [slavic] “paganism” justified the Communist regime, helped authorities to struggle against the monotheist religions and recognized atheism as a special sort of faith (Shneider 1993. Also see: Falikov 1989). A passion for paganism was growing side by side with an interest in folk culture, and propagandists intentionally taught people that pagan faith and rituals had to be viewed as valuable cultural heritage strictly connected to ethnic identity. The Communist authorities not only tolerated these attitudes, but even deliberately promoted them in the face of the coming 1000th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus’. Suffice it to say that in some regions of the USSR directors of the collective farms were obliged to arrange festivals charged with pagan spirit. ⟨…⟩ Mass Soviet propaganda about Russia’s pagan heritage was a success, as the very nature of the atheist way of life in the USSR encouraged pagan and occult attitudes (Dunaev 1998). A sociological survey of non-traditional religions carried out in the 1980s demonstrated that new, post-atheist denominations were growing like mushrooms between the 1970s and 1980s.” Citation: Borowska, P. (2017). Atheist Secularism and its Discontents. A Comparative Study of Religion and Communism in Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(6), 992–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1347391 @SSTruthSeekersSS

What's curious about Codreanu's murder is that he and the other legionaries that night weren't executed by a shot to the head, which would've been way more practical, since the authorities shot their corpses to make it look like they were gunned down while trying to escape anyways. They were tied in a peculiar way, with their hands tied to the bench behind them and their legs to the lower part of the bench in front of them. They were then garroted to death from behind by a gendarme with a rope thrown over their head. Prince Sturdza in his memoirs remarks that this is how the Talmud instructs Jews to execute goyim (this part was left out of the heavily censored English translation of his memoirs). This can only lead to the conclusion that Codreanu's murder wasn't just a political assassination, but also a Talmudic ritual sacrifice. Вѣчьнаꙗ памѧть!

⟨ orbem certe dicimus terrae, globumque verticibus includi fatemur. neque enim absoluti orbis est forma in tanta montium excelsitate, tanta camporum planitie, sed cuius amplexus, si capita cunctarum liniarum conprehendantur ambitu, figuram absoluti orbis efficiat — id quod ipsa rerum natura cogit, non eisdem causis quas attulimus in caelo. namque in illo cava in se convexitas vergit et cardini suo, hoc est terrae, imdique incumbit, haec ut solida ac conferta adsurgit intumescenti similis extraque protenditur ⟩ “We do undoubtedly speak of the earth's sphere, and admit that the globe is shut in between poles, Nor yet in fact do all these lofty mountains and widely spreading plains comprise the outline of a perfect sphere, but a figure whose circuit would produce a perfect sphere if the ends of all the lines were enclosed in a circumference. This is the consequence of the very nature of things, it is not due to the same causes as those we have adduced in the case of the heaven; for in the heaven the convex hollow converges on itself and from all sides rests upon its pivot, the earth, whereas the earth being a solid dense mass rises like an object swelling, and expands outward.” — Pliny The Elder: Natural History. With an English translation in Ten volumes. Volume I - Praefatio, Libri I, II. by H. Rackham, M.A. Harvard University Press, 1949. pp.170-175.

“I STRICTLY FORBID any disturbance or tactlessness at religious events of all denominations (e.g. also at processions of the Catholic Church). A tactful attitude is also a matter of course when churches are visited for historical or artistic reasons. Just as I make sure that, in accordance with the orders of the Führer's deputy, no one suffers any disadvantage or even ridicule because of his own religious worldview, I forbid myself to allow a member of the SS to harass or ridicule another person because of his religious beliefs. Just as the German has never been in favor of compulsion of conscience, the religious convictions and views of his neighbor are just as sacred and inviolable to him. I will expel members of the SS who violate these principles from the SS as soon as I learn of them.” — Heinrich Himmler, BArch NS 19/3902, pp. 58 (15 September 1934)

The myth of Mussolini’s Jewish mistress and “Kosher fascism” Many often site the story of Mussolini’s supposed Jewish mistress (Margherita Sarfatti) as an attempt to delegitimize the moral integrity of the Italian Fascist regime and to push the narrative that Mussolini was a hypocrite that was unconcerned with any Jewish question or Fascist ideal. This story of the Jewish mistress is repeated by anti-fascists and misinformed nationalists alike. Her presence as a journalist in the early years of the Fascist regime is often used by some to highlight the supposed Jewish influence in Italian fascism, usually as another angle of slander to display Italian Fascism as an inconsistent and hypocritical ideology. Regarding this supposed affair with Margherita Sarfatti, this is a claim which derives from Sarfatti herself. Apart from her own accusation, there is no evidence whatsoever of her being Mussolini’s mistress. Sarfatti was an embittered Jewess who after the Italian anti-Semitic laws of 1938 leveled accusations of adultery against Mussolini and outrageously attributed to herself the role of having "created Fascism". Sarfatti's role in Fascist history is, due to her Jewish background, greatly exaggerated by modern writers. In her years as a supporter of the Fascist Party she contributed nothing to Fascism outside of editing a newspaper favorable to Fascism and to the Party, a role no more important than what was performed by hundreds of other writers and newspaper editors. Her only legitimate claim to fame, her authorship of a biography favorable towards Mussolini and to Fascism (The Life of Benito Mussolini, 1925), which by that time was an already established and widely accepted ideology, the product of Mussolini's genius, and nothing to do with Sarfatti.   Her own exaggerated claims as regards her role in shaping Fascism, and her slanderous assertions of carrying on an early love affair with Mussolini, are the product of strong bitterness towards Mussolini and the Fascist Party for enacting anti-Semitic laws in 1938. Additionally, already in 1932 she had been fired and not allowed to write articles in Fascist newspapers. All this, together with Sarfatti's delusion of an early "Kosher Fascism" of which she considered herself to be a part of, and of a later supposedly "corrupt Fascism", which she felt betrayed by, and falsely claimed was the product of German National Socialist influence.   Sarfatti's exaggerated, mythical, and slanderous claims regarding her role in Fascist history (such as claiming to have written articles in Mussolini's name, claiming to have been the theorist behind the March on Rome, claiming to have been Mussolini's personal adviser who helped shape Fascist ideology, etc.) and libels against Mussolini's character (such as claiming to have had love affairs with him during his marriage) are found mainly in her own post-war writings and testimonies, and it is primarily from these that modern writers base their own libels, exaggerations and gossip, treating them as if they were dogma. It is also worth noting that Sarfatti had converted to Christianity and was baptized Catholic in the 1920's, although her doctrinal orthodoxy and sincerity can be debated, especially given her behaviour. Her later actions puts her Jewishness and insincerity on full display. Mussolini himself alluded to the accusations of his extramarital affairs in his book "Story of a Year” from 1944: "Suddenly, the floodgates of gossip were thrown open, and the five percent of truth was embroidered with wild fancies of all sorts which, however, did not fail to excite the curiosity of the mob... It was necessary to make an end of me, first of all by a silence of the grave, and then by ridicule… 'Keep on slandering, some of the mud will stick.' And there is no doubt that some did stick." The tale of Mussolini’s supposed Jewish mistress has no legitimacy whatsoever, and is on-par with the tales of Hitler supposedly having sexual relations with his niece or being partially Jewish: completely slanderous and baseless propaganda.

https://jewishstandard.timesofisrael.com/donald-trump-is-the-messiah/amp/ Donald Trump is the [Jewish] messiah. By LARRY YUDELSON Near the end of the 80-minute cellphone recording of the dinner, Parnas presents Trump with what he says is a gift from “the head rabbi of Ukraine” and some rabbis in Israel. He explains that according to gematria, the letters in Trump’s name add up to 424, which is the same total as the letters in the Hebrew word for messiah. The gift, which apparently refers to the numerology, cannot be seen on the recording, so it is not clear what it is. “It’s like a miracle,” Fruman is heard telling Trump on the recording. Parnas goes on to explain that the messiah is “the person that has come to save the whole world. So it’s like you’re the savior of the Ukraine.” [...] While Kushner can no doubt explain gematria, if he were to actually crunch the numbers he might have trouble matching what Parnas described with the numerology of mashiach, which totals 358.

"The SS organization had been built by Himmler based on the principles of the Jesuit Order. The statutes of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola formed a pattern that Himmler assiduously tried to copy . ABSOLUTE OBEDIENCE was the supreme rule; Each and every order had to be accepted without question. [...] Himmler's title of "Reichsführer SS" as supreme head of the SS was intended to be the counterpart to the Jesuits' "General of the Order", and the ENTIRE STRUCTURE of the leadership was adopted from these studies of the Church's hierarchical order." — ᛋᛋ-Oberführer Walter Schellenberg, Ref: The Labyrinth: Memoirs Of Walter Schellenberg, Hitler's Chief Of Counterintelligence, pp.15

Mussolini did not fill the Italian military with “Fascist cronies” It has been claimed by many that Mussolini made an effort to fill the Italian military with his own Fascist “cronies” without concern for merit. This idea that the Italian military was ran by incompetent fascist cronies is often used as an explanation for any perceived Italian incompetence or military inadequacy, and as an explanation for the Italians being ill-prepared for World War II. The idea that inadequate fascist generals were at fault for Italy being ill-prepared for World War II is completely incorrect. Firstly, with the slightest amount of research, you will find that a large portion of the military leaders were not even fascist, mostly being holdovers from the pre-fascist era, as Mussolini did not have full military powers and only received shared military powers with the king after March 30, 1938, as the “First Marshal of the Empire.” As Mussolini was not the head of state, his ability to influence the military was limited, and he was only given military powers in 1938, a mere two years before the war would begin. The challenge to completely reform the military high command was is a daunting task to say the least, and Mussolini most definitely was not capable of replacing everyone was loyal fascists, an action that the king, who was still the head of state, and who still shared military powers with Mussolini, would never have agreed to. It is true, however, that there was a significant number of loyal fascists who rose in the ranks of the military under Fascism, however, this is hardly a surprise given the fact that many of the committed Fascists were ex-soldiers (something that the fascist regime was very proud of) so it’s only natural that these former soldiers would seek positions in the military complex. However, whatever struggles that the Italian military faced in World War II had absolutely nothing to do with fascist influence or nepotism, in fact we effectively have firsthand accounts of the contrary. The most highly esteemed units of the Italian army were that of the MVSN or Blackshirts, specifically the elite special forces of Battaglioni M. These units were composed entirely of men ideologically devoted to Fascism. These elite units were filled with and commanded by devoted fascists, and were often compared to the Waffen SS for their elite and professional nature in every campaign they partook in. If “fascist nepotism” was the reason for any struggles that the Italian military faced, we should not expect this sort of performance from units that were entirely composed of loyal fascists. In fact, it seems that if loyalty was an issue for the Italian military, it surely wasn’t the issue of men being chosen out of loyalty to Fascism and without merit, rather the problem appears to be with generals who were holdovers from the pre-fascist era that had absolutely no loyalty to the regime or the military objectives of their country. Most of these generals would defect to the allies in 1943. In August 1941, Mussolini would go as far as to say this in a conversation with Hitler: ”Tell me what you would do if you had officers who had doubts about the regime and its ideologies... and who said, while you spoke about your ideology or reason of State, that they are monarchists and that they owe loyalty only to the King?” In conclusion, the narrative that “fascist nepotism” caused Italy’s military failures completely falls apart with the slightest amount of research and is nothing more than postwar revisionist propaganda.

Around minute 39 into this video he begins complaining about Fascist Italy teaching children to walk in military formation, to shoot rifles, and for boys to be brave and manly (or “ruthless” in his words.) He then tries to make a connection to this perceived “ruthless” mindset of fascism and the Italian treatment of its colonies during various pacification campaigns, specifically mentioning Somalia. Now it is beyond my comprehension how this is connected in anyway (teaching White kids to shoot rifles means Black people die in Africa somehow) In his attempt to villainize the Italians for their pacification campaign he completely ignores the fact that various other colonial powers engaged in similar, if not harsher pacification campaigns using similar methods. The Italians are often ridiculed for using mustard gas in certain pacification campaigns, when various other colonial powers were also using mustard gas. The British for example used chemical weapons in the 1920 revolt in Iraq and were producing chemical weapons well into the late 1930s. He tries to argue that the Italians were extremely harsh to the native Africans, but he completely neglects the massive investments that the Italians were making in modernizing the colonial economies (investments larger than any other colonial power) The Italians also actively collaborated with local African rulers before and after the Ethiopian campaign, one only needs to search the names of Abba Jofir, Hailu Tekle Haymanot, and Haile Selassie Gugsa as examples. He also mocks the Italians for public spending throughout this video while simultaneously ignoring the fact that a large portion of this public spending was actually spent in the colonies in order to economically develop them. I will make more posts regarding claims made in this video soon.

I don’t usually do this, but it’s been brought to my attention that a certain liberal loving monarchist has decided to make a nearly hour long video attempting to delegitimize Italian Fascism with some of the most disingenuous arguments I believe I’ve seen on the subject. Since this guy has a degree of credibility in these circles, expect me to make several posts responding to his disingenuous arguments.

The old chat was banned again. Spread the new link. https://t.me/AryanGuild1

On this day in 1889, Adolf Hitler was born. Happy Birthday to the Führer! Sieg Heil! 🌚

Original audio: an SS officer playing the organ in the remains of a Church in France

"There was a great movement among them, well-represented in Vienna, and which strongly confirmed the national character of Jewry: this was Zionism. From outward appearances, it seemed as if only part of the Jews championed this movement, while the great majority disapproved of or even repudiated it. But a close examination showed that those appearances were deliberately misleading. They emerged from a fog of theories that were produced for reasons of expediency, if not outright deception. The so-called liberal Jews did not reject the Zionists as if non-Jews, but only as brother Jews with an impractical or even dangerous way of promoting Jewry. There was no real conflict in their inner nature. This fictitious conflict between the Zionists and the liberal Jews soon disgusted me; it was thoroughly false, and in direct contradiction to the moral dignity and immaculate character on which that people had always prided itself." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf Chapter II