17th SOG

Navy EOD Ethos I am a United States Navy EOD Technician, a warrior, professional Sailor and guardian of life. I willfully accept the danger of my chosen profession and will accomplish all duties my great country asks of me. I follow in the wake of those who have served before me with uncommon valor. I was born from the bombs and mines of the blitzkrieg. I have cleared the world’s sea lanes and fought in the jungles, deserts and mountains around the globe. I will never disgrace the Navy EOD Warriors of the past and will uphold their honor and memory, both on and off the battlefield. I am a quiet professional! I strive to excel in every art and artifice of war. I adapt to every situation and will overcome all obstacles. I will never fail those who depend upon me. I maintain my mind, body, and equipment in the highest state of readiness that is worthy of the most elite Warrior. I will defeat my enemies’ spirit because my spirit is stronger. I will defeat my enemies’ weapons because I know my enemies’ weapons better. I will complete every mission with honor, courage, and commitment. Though I may be alone and completely isolated, I will trust my teammates and my country. I will never give up and I will never surrender. Where most strive and train to get it right, I will relentlessly train so I never get it wrong. I am a United States Navy EOD Technician.

I'm currently working on one of the most significant articles that will soon be published. Recently, an insightful individual shared some thought-provoking statistics: “If US 340 million Americans actually decided to stand up to 542 politicians whom used us, lied to us gained wealth from us, killed us, indoctrinated us, abused our children, enslaved our youth, removed Christ from everything and painted God, fearing liberty loving patriots is terrorists” - PunishDem1776 I have written a plan to address these challenges in We the People, part 6. But there is one more important lesson to learn—the American elections. This topic has been a subject of discussion for three years. Were the 2020 elections stolen? Did Biden truly win? With this upcoming article, we aim to ensure that cheating and mismanagement never occur again. However, it is crucial for each of you to understand the system. There is an often-overlooked component within our election system that requires an overhaul. We need to step forward and fill these positions, taking control of the battleground. The Democratic party has excelled at this, and it's time for us to do better. I have faith that we can and will. This is part 7 of "We The People," The American Elections, and without a doubt, will be the most important article you'll read.

By now, most of you are well aware of the appalling treatment of our country's children. To say they are being mistreated is an understatement—it is an unimaginable atrocity. The way our children are being treated is not only despicable but also profoundly evil. As we raise awareness and many individuals contribute their part to help save them, it is imperative that we take action to remove and replace the government responsible for putting our children in such dire circumstances. We must stand up, learn, and dedicate our time to remove and replace the leaders who have brought our children to this state of despair and horror. We can no longer tolerate this injustice; we must act decisively by replacing the leaders who passively observe without taking any meaningful action. Your vote is a powerful weapon—one that can bring about substantial change. It is difficult to even utter the words "our children deserve better" because it should be a given. However, we can no longer endure the current stagnant leadership that fails to prioritize our most cherished, our most loved, our most important, our country’s future, our beloved children. It’s time, “We the People, Nothing Can Stop Us, We are Coming!”

While by no means exhaustive (no mention of an investigation into big pharma’s role in the autism/ADHD/etc. plague in our kids, for example), this CNN article is a pretty solid review of Trump’s current policy platform. CNN! https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/08/politics/trump-campaign-promises/index.html

I find myself engrossed in profound research for my upcoming article on American elections. Allow me to emphasize the utmost importance of a fundamental action we, as responsible citizens, ought to undertake: comprehending and familiarizing ourselves with our local government and its intricate mechanisms. This entails understanding the roles and responsibilities of both elected and appointed positions, as well as discerning their impact on our respective communities. Consequently, I would encourage the creation of a comprehensive inventory, prioritizing these positions based on their influence over our specific needs, ranging from the most significant to the least. Furthermore, it is imperative to strategize the removal and replacement of individuals who fail to fulfill their obligations. However, it is crucial to avoid undertaking this endeavor alone; the synergy of collective effort is paramount. By joining forces with others, whether it be a pair or a group of ten, the potential for effecting change is boundless. Remember, one should never succumb to feelings of defeat or surrender. Such sentiments have no place in our pursuit of a better future.

3 And; B. Division of Powers: The U.S. Constitution divides powers between the federal government and the states. If the federal government or treaty provision, much like UN Charter, or a “second constitution”requires action that the federal government does not have the constitutional authority to take, that provision may not be enforceable in U.S. law. The same principal applies to: The United Nations Charter. Which is an international treaty, and like other international treaties, it forms part of the "supreme Law of the Land" in the United States under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2). This means that U.S. courts are bound to enforce the provisions of the Charter. However, it is “subject to certain constitutional limitations.” Much like the same Constitutional limitations the Federal government has. Although Article VI, Clause 2 establishes the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, and U.S. treaties as "the supreme law of the land, “ the treaty cannot conflict with the Constitution, if it does, the Constitution prevails. BECAUSE “subject to certain constitutional limitations” such as, 1. Judicial Review: This is the principle that the judiciary can review and nullify legislative and executive actions if they are found to be unconstitutional. This principle, although not explicitly stated in the Constitution, was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison. 2. Non-Self-Executing Treaties: Some treaties or treaty provisions are deemed "non-self-executing," meaning they do not become enforceable U.S. law upon ratification. Instead, they require implementing legislation to be passed by Congress. This principle is reflected in various court decisions and legal doctrines. 3. Individual Rights (this is the kicker): The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain individual rights, such as freedom of speech and religion. If a treaty provision conflicts with these rights, the constitutional rights would take precedence in U.S. courts. This principle is reflected in the Bill of Rights and other constitutional amendments, as well as in a vast body of case law. 4. Division of Powers (another kicker): The U.S. Constitution divides powers between the federal government and the states. If a treaty provision requires action that the federal government does not have the constitutional authority to take, that provision may not be enforceable in U.S. law. This principle is reflected in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and in various court decisions. These principles are deeply ingrained in U.S. law and guide the interpretation and application of all laws and treaties in the United States. They ensure that the U.S. remains a constitutional republic where government action is limited by law and individual rights are protected. Just because there has been two cases where the Justice made poor rulings as in the two cases it has ruled in regarding the UN Treaty, does not mean the Supreme Courts are bought and paid for. I would argue, if such decisions were made today, the constitution would be for sure upheld with the justices we have now. This is why its crucial that you participate in civic duties and elect the right individuals, who in turn appoint the right individuals.

2. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871: Governance of Washington D.C. The Organic Act of 1871 played a pivotal role in shaping Washington D.C. as a federal territory, setting up a local government structure for the city. However, it's crucial to understand that this act did not convert D.C. into a business corporation. Rather, it designated D.C. as a municipal corporation, which is a form of local government, distinct from a private, profit-seeking corporation. Importantly, while D.C. is a federal district, it does not equate to being the federal government itself. The federal government is a broader entity that encompasses all three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial, operating nationwide, not confined to the geographical boundaries of D.C. Before the Act of 1871, the District of Columbia was governed by two municipalities, Washington and Georgetown, each with their own local governments. The rest of the district was under the control of the federal government. The Act of 1871 consolidated these three entities into one, creating a single municipal government for the entire District of Columbia. What authority did Congress have to do this? The Organic Act of 1871, like any other act of Congress, was created under the legislative powers granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution provides that "The Congress shall have Power... To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States...". This clause, often referred to as the "District Clause", gives Congress the authority to exercise exclusive legislation over the District of Columbia, which includes the power to establish a local government for the District. The Organic Act of 1871 was an exercise of this constitutional authority. In terms of specific laws that were used as a basis for the Organic Act of 1871, it's important to note that the Act itself is a law, passed by Congress and signed by the President. The Act would have been drafted by members of Congress (and their staff) who would have used existing laws, legal principles, and their understanding of the Constitution as a guide. For municipal corporations, congress had references such as; “Rules and orders for the regulation of the corporation when met in Common Council, 1800–1809” Philadelphia had already established a municipal corporation, 1800 to 1809 However, the specific laws or legal texts that they used are not typically recorded or referenced in the Act itself. It's also worth noting that the Organic Act of 1871 was not the first law to establish a government for the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801, for example, provided for the administration of the District by a mayor appointed by the President. The Organic Act of 1871 replaced this appointed mayor with a governor and council elected by the residents of the District. This change would have been based on the principles of constitutional republic, which are fundamental to the U.S. system of government and are enshrined in the Constitution. This is why there is only one constitution. You cannot have the US constitution create another constitution that supersedes it The federal government, to which the constitution creates and has supreme authority over, cannot create another constitution. Especially when; A. Individual Rights are violated: The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain individual rights, such as freedom of speech and religion. If the federal government or treaty provision, much like UN Charter, conflicts with these rights, the constitutional rights would take precedence in U.S. courts. This principle is reflected in the Bill of Rights and other constitutional amendments, as well as in a vast body of case law.

1 The United States of America is not a corporation nor does it have two constitutions. Here’s why. We have to start with the Constitution which established the federal government: The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, meaning that it takes precedence over all other laws in the United States, including federal laws. The Constitution CANNOT be incorporated. This principle is established in Article VI of the Constitution, which states: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." In other words, if a federal law were somehow passed that contradicted the Constitution, that law would be considered unconstitutional and could be struck down by the courts. This is a key aspect of the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution, which ensures that no branch of government can overstep its authority. 1. U.S. Constitution, Article I: Establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the U.S. Congress, which makes the laws of the nation. 2. U.S. Constitution, Article II: Establishes the executive branch of the federal government, which is vested in the President of the United States, and includes duties such as executing federal law, appointing federal executive, diplomatic, regulatory, and judicial officers, and directing foreign and domestic policy. 3. U.S. Constitution, Article III: Establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, the Supreme Court and other federal courts, which interpret and apply the law in federal legal cases. 4. U.S. Constitution, Article IV: Discusses the relationship between the states and the federal government. It also outlines the obligations of the states to each other. 5. U.S. Constitution, Article V: Describes the process for amending the Constitution. 6. U.S. Constitution, Article VI: Establishes the Constitution, and all federal laws and treaties of the United States made according to it, to be the supreme law of the land, and that "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the laws or constitutions of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." 7. U.S. Code, Title 1, Chapter 2, §106b: Discusses the process for adopting amendments to the Constitution. 8. U.S. Code, Title 4, Chapter 4, §101: Requires every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, to take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States

Fact 8 - Corporation, Government and Municipal Corporations A corporation, a government, and a municipal corporation are all distinct entities, each with its own unique characteristics and functions. 1. Corporation: A corporation is a legal entity created by individuals, stockholders, or shareholders, with the purpose of conducting business. It operates according to its articles of incorporation and bylaws, with a defined structure that includes a board of directors and officers. Its primary goal is to generate profits for its shareholders. 2. Government: A government is a system or group of people governing an organized community, often a state. In the case of the United States, the federal government is established by the Constitution, which outlines the structure of the government and the rights and responsibilities of its branches and officials. The primary purpose of the government is not to generate profits, but to provide services and protections to its citizens, maintain order, and uphold the rights and freedoms outlined in the Constitution. 3. Municipal Corporation: A municipal corporation is a type of public corporation created by a city, town, or other municipality. It is a legal entity separate from the citizens it serves and has the power to perform specific governmental functions at the local level, such as zoning, public transportation, and waste management. While it has a corporate status, its primary purpose is not to generate profits but to provide services to its residents. It operates under a charter granted by the state, which outlines its powers and responsibilities. In summary, while these entities may share some characteristics, they are fundamentally different. A corporation is primarily profit-driven, a government is service-oriented with a focus on maintaining order and protecting citizens' rights, and a municipal corporation, while having a corporate status, is a local governmental entity focused on providing specific services to its residents.

Fact 7 - Corporation: Corporation: A corporation is a legal entity, acting as a single unit separate from its owners, with the ability to sue, be sued, lend, and borrow. It's primarily governed by state laws, which dictate its formation, operation, and dissolution. Some aspects, like securities regulation, are under federal law. A key benefit of a corporation is limited liability, protecting shareholders' personal assets beyond their investment in the corporation. However, traditional corporations face double-taxation, as they're taxed at the corporate level and shareholders are taxed on dividends. According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, a corporation is an entity that acts as a single, fictional person. It can sue, be sued, lend, and borrow. Corporations are primarily authorized and governed by state law, with many states following the Model Business Corporation Act provided by the American Bar Association (ABA). These state corporation laws typically require articles of incorporation to document the corporation's creation and to provide provisions regarding the management of internal affairs. The first corporation in the sense we understand it today — a business entity recognized as a person under the law — was the Bank of North America, which was chartered in 1781 to fund the American Revolutionary War. As for government corporations, the first significant one in the U.S. was the federally chartered Second Bank of the United States, established in 1816. However, the modern era of federal government corporations really began in the 20th century with entities like the Tennessee Valley Authority, created in 1933. While primarily governed by state law, certain aspects of corporations are governed by federal law. In particular, the Securities Act of 1933 requires most corporations offering stock to file with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and to regularly disclose financial statements and other executive information. The authority to grant corporations is typically vested in the states, and each state has its own laws governing the formation, operation, and dissolution of corporations. A corporation is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from its owners (shareholders). It is created by filing articles of incorporation with the state's secretary of state and is governed by its bylaws, which are the rules and regulations enacted by a corporation for its own governance. Key characteristics of a corporation include: 1. Shareholders: These are the owners of the corporation. They hold shares of the corporation's stock, and their ownership stake is proportionate to the amount of stock they own. 2. Board of Directors: The shareholders elect a board of directors, which has the responsibility of managing the corporation's business and affairs. 3. Officers: The board of directors appoints officers (such as a CEO, CFO, etc.) who manage the day-to-day operations of the corporation. 4. Limited Liability: Shareholders have limited liability for the corporation's debts and obligations. This means that shareholders are not personally responsible for the corporation's debts; their liability is limited to the amount they have invested in the corporation. 5. Articles of Incorporation: This is the document that establishes the existence of a corporation. It is filed with a state government and includes information such as the corporation's name, purpose, duration, and the number of shares it is authorized to issue. 6. Bylaws: These are the internal rules and procedures for the conduct of a corporation. They set forth the structure of the corporation and govern the relationships among the corporation, its directors, officers, and shareholders

Fact 6 - The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871: Governance of Washington D.C. The Organic Act of 1871 played a pivotal role in shaping Washington D.C. as a federal territory, setting up a local government structure for the city. However, it's crucial to understand that this act did not convert D.C. into a business corporation. Rather, it designated D.C. as a municipal corporation, which is a form of local government, distinct from a private, profit-seeking corporation. Importantly, while D.C. is a federal district, it does not equate to being the federal government itself. The federal government is a broader entity that encompasses all three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial, operating nationwide, not confined to the geographical boundaries of D.C. Before the Act of 1871, the District of Columbia was governed by two municipalities, Washington and Georgetown, each with their own local governments. The rest of the district was under the control of the federal government. The Act of 1871 consolidated these three entities into one, creating a single municipal government for the entire District of Columbia. The Act of 1871 did not change the status of the United States or turn it into a corporation. Instead, it changed the local government structure of the District of Columbia. The term "corporation" in this context refers to a municipal corporation, which is a term used to describe a local governing body, such as a city or town. It does not imply that the United States became a business corporation. Furthermore, the Act of 1871 was later replaced by the Act of 1874, which abolished the territorial government and put the District of Columbia back under direct federal control. Then, in 1973, Congress enacted the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, providing for an elected mayor and city council for the District. In conclusion, the Act of 1871 was a significant piece of legislation in the history of the District of Columbia's governance, but it did not turn the United States into a corporation. The United States remains a federal republic, as established by the Constitution.

Fact 5 - Federal Corporations: The federal government does have entities that are classified as "federal corporations." These are created by Congress to undertake commercial activities on behalf of the government. They are established to provide a public service and are often independent or government-owned corporations. Here are some examples of federal corporations: 1. United States Postal Service (USPS): An independent agency of the federal government responsible for providing postal service in the United States. 2. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA): A federally owned corporation in the United States created by congressional charter in May 1933 to provide navigation, flood control, electricity generation, fertilizer manufacturing, and economic development in the Tennessee Valley, a region particularly affected by the Great Depression. 3. Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB): A non-profit corporation created by an act of the United States Congress and funded by the federal government to promote public broadcasting. 4. Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation): A passenger railroad service that provides medium and long-distance intercity service in the contiguous United States and to nine Canadian cities. 5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): A United States government corporation providing deposit insurance to depositors in U.S. commercial banks and savings institutions. 6. Federal Home Loan Banks (FHL Banks): A system of 11 U.S. government-sponsored banks that provide reliable liquidity to member financial institutions (not individuals) to support housing finance and community investment. Misunderstanding the nature of the U.S. government and its relationship with federal corporations can lead to missed opportunities. Here are a few examples: 1. Participation in Governance: If people believe that the government is a corporation, they might feel dis-empowered and less likely to participate in democratic processes like voting, running for office, or engaging in public discourse. Understanding that the government is a public institution, accountable to the people, can encourage more active participation. 2. Influence over Federal Corporations: Federal corporations are created by the government to serve public interests. If people understand this, they might be more likely to advocate for their interests within the framework of these corporations. For example, they might campaign for better service from the Postal Service or for specific programming from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 3. Policy Advocacy: If people misunderstand the nature of the government, they might also misunderstand its policies, including those that regulate corporations. This could hinder effective advocacy for policy changes. 4. Legal Rights and Protections: Misunderstanding the government could lead to a lack of awareness about the legal rights and protections that the government provides to its citizens.

Fact 4 - Define the United States: The term "United States" and "Government" are defined in various ways across different sections of the U.S. Code, often depending on the context in which they are used. These U.S. Code definitions collectively establish the United States as a sovereign entity with jurisdiction over certain territories and clarify the structure of the U.S. Government, including its executive, judicial, and legislative branches. They also define the nature of government corporations and their relationship to the U.S. Government. Here's a breakdown: 1. 18 U.S. Code § 5: This code defines the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, emphasizing its sovereignty over all places and waters, continental or insular, under its jurisdiction. This includes all states, territories, and possessions of the United States. 2. 5 U.S. Code § 103: This code defines a "Government corporation" as a corporation owned or controlled by the U.S. Government, highlighting the government's ability to establish entities to carry out specific functions. It also distinguishes between corporations owned by the government and those merely controlled by it, indicating the varying degrees of government involvement in different entities. 3. 5 U.S. Code § 5921: This code further defines the term "Government" as the Government of the United States, reinforcing the concept of the U.S. as a sovereign entity. It also provides geographical definitions of the United States, distinguishing between the continental U.S. and its territories and possessions. 4. 5 U.S. Code § 2101: This code defines the "civil service" as all appointive positions in the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of the U.S. Government, excluding positions in the uniformed services. This highlights the structure and scope of the U.S. Government. 5. 36 U.S. Code § 151710: This code clarifies that the U.S. Government is not liable for any debts, defaults, acts, or omissions of a corporation, and that the full faith and credit of the Government does not extend to any obligation of the corporation. This underscores the legal distinction between the U.S. Government and the corporations it owns or controls. These codes collectively establish the United States as a sovereign entity with its own territorial jurisdiction, government structure (including executive, judicial, and legislative branches), and the ability to create and control corporations. They also clarify the legal distinction between the U.S. Government and the corporations it owns or controls.

Fact 3 - Contextual Interpretation of Law: Context is crucial in interpreting the law. Legal texts, including statutes, regulations, and court decisions, do not exist in a vacuum. They are part of a larger legal system and must be understood in relation to that system. Here's how context plays a role in interpreting the law: 1. Statutory Context: The words of a statute must be read in their context with the other provisions of the statute. This includes not just the immediate section or subsection, but the entire statute or act. The goal is to interpret the statute as a harmonious whole. 2. Historical Context: The history of a statute or a legal rule, including its original enactment, amendments, and how it has been interpreted over time, can provide important context. This is often referred to as legislative history. 3. Purpose and Policy: Courts often look at the purpose or policy behind a law to help interpret it. This can include the problem the law was intended to address, the goals it was meant to achieve, and the values it reflects. 4. Precedent: How courts have interpreted a law in the past provides important context. Precedent, or prior judicial decisions, guide future interpretations of the law. 5. Legal Tradition and Principles: Laws are interpreted in the context of broader legal principles and traditions. For example, in criminal law, there is a principle that ambiguity in criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of the defendant (the rule of lenity). 6. Factual Context: The specific facts and circumstances of a case can influence how laws are interpreted and applied. This is particularly true in common law systems where the facts of a case can help shape the interpretation of the law. Lawyers use context in all these ways to argue for particular interpretations of the law. They might point to the statutory context, historical background, purpose and policy, precedent, legal principles, and the facts of the case to support their interpretation. Courts also use context in these ways when they interpret the law. They aim to interpret the law in a way that is consistent with the text, history, purpose, precedent, and the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

Fact 2 - The Constitution: The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, meaning that it takes precedence over all other laws in the United States, including federal laws. The Constitution CANNOT be incorporated. This principle is established in Article VI of the Constitution, which states: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." In other words, if a federal law were somehow passed that contradicted the Constitution, that law would be considered unconstitutional and could be struck down by the courts. This is a key aspect of the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution, which ensures that no branch of government can overstep its authority. 1. U.S. Constitution, Article I: Establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the U.S. Congress, which makes the laws of the nation. 2. U.S. Constitution, Article II: Establishes the executive branch of the federal government, which is vested in the President of the United States, and includes duties such as executing federal law, appointing federal executive, diplomatic, regulatory, and judicial officers, and directing foreign and domestic policy. 3. U.S. Constitution, Article III: Establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, the Supreme Court and other federal courts, which interpret and apply the law in federal legal cases. 4. U.S. Constitution, Article IV: Discusses the relationship between the states and the federal government. It also outlines the obligations of the states to each other. 5. U.S. Constitution, Article V: Describes the process for amending the Constitution. 6. U.S. Constitution, Article VI: Establishes the Constitution, and all federal laws and treaties of the United States made according to it, to be the supreme law of the land, and that "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the laws or constitutions of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." 7. U.S. Code, Title 1, Chapter 2, §106b: Discusses the process for adopting amendments to the Constitution. 8. U.S. Code, Title 4, Chapter 4, §101: Requires every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, to take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States.

1. The U.S is not a corporation. Facts matter. The Crown Owning the United States: The Treaty of Paris, which ended the American Revolutionary War, does not contain any provision or language that suggests that Britain retained any sovereignty or ownership over the United States. In fact, Article 1 of the Treaty of Paris explicitly states: "His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independent States; that he treats with them as such, and for himself his Heirs & Successors, relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety, and Territorial Rights of the same and every Part thereof." This means that the British King recognized the United States as free, sovereign, and independent states, and that he and his successors gave up all claims to the government, propriety, and territorial rights of the United States and every part of it.

" It is imperative that we grasp the fundamental dynamics of US local government—the organizational structure, sources of power, and governing bodies. With this knowledge in our arsenal, we can devise effective strategies and operations that account for the specific nuances and influences of our local communities. Our series fearlessly confronts the pervasive issues of corruption, crime, and election fraud. While acknowledging their existence, we caution against painting them with broad strokes of despair. Mechanisms are in place to deter such actions, but eternal vigilance remains the price we must pay. We implore you to approach allegations of deception with discernment, for a comprehensive understanding of the situation is vital."