17th SOG
Open in Telegram
Official Telegram home for the 17th Special Operations Group 17sog.substack.com
Show moreThe country is not specifiedThe category is not specified
859
Subscribers
No data24 hours
No data7 days
No data30 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '23
September '23
+2
in 0 channels
August '23
+1
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+5
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+54
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+86
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+34
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+54
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+53
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+82
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+835
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 23 September | 0 | |||
| 22 September | 0 | |||
| 21 September | 0 | |||
| 20 September | +1 | |||
| 19 September | 0 | |||
| 18 September | 0 | |||
| 17 September | +1 | |||
| 16 September | 0 | |||
| 15 September | 0 | |||
| 14 September | 0 | |||
| 13 September | 0 | |||
| 12 September | 0 | |||
| 11 September | 0 | |||
| 10 September | 0 | |||
| 09 September | 0 | |||
| 08 September | 0 | |||
| 07 September | 0 | |||
| 06 September | 0 | |||
| 05 September | 0 | |||
| 04 September | 0 | |||
| 03 September | 0 | |||
| 02 September | 0 | |||
| 01 September | 0 |
Channel Posts
As for the claim that some conspiracy theorists make, pointing to a corporate entity registered in Delaware as "proof" that the United States is a corporation. This claim often refers to a specific entity named "United States Corporation Company" or something similar, which is or was registered in Delaware.
Here's why this claim does not hold up to scrutiny:
1. Corporate Naming: Just because a private entity chooses a name that includes the words "United States" does not mean it has any connection to the federal government. Corporations can choose a wide variety of names, provided they comply with the naming laws of the jurisdiction in which they are registered.
2. Lack of Legal Connection: There is no legal connection between the U.S. federal government and a private corporation registered in Delaware or any other state with a name resembling "United States Corporation Company." The existence of such a corporation does not change the constitutional structure or legal status of the U.S. government.
3. Misunderstanding of Corporate Law: The claim misunderstands how corporate law works. Corporations are legal entities that can be formed by individuals or other corporations for various purposes, such as conducting business or holding assets. The existence of a corporation with a particular name does not imply any broader legal or governmental structure.
4. Constitutional Federal Republic: The United States operates as a constitutional federal republic, not a corporation. Its governance structure is defined by the U.S. Constitution, and its legal status is well-established in law and history.
The existence of a corporation registered in Delaware with a name that includes "United States" is not evidence of any broader conspiracy or hidden legal structure. It's a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of corporate law and does not provide any support for the claim that the United States is a corporation.
| 2 | This is not even debatableβ¦. | 189 |
| 3 | Now then, letβs look at the next smoking gun section, section 16;
Section 16.
And be it further enacted, That the District shall never pay, assume, or become responsible for the debts or liabilities of, or in any manner give, loan, or extend its credit to or in aid of any public or other corporation, association, or individual.
Almost seems as if Congress at the time knew the possibility of something like what the US corporation theory speculates could happen, and specifically inserted language to prevent it. Insane right!?
Hereβs a detailed breakdown:
1.Prohibition on Assuming Debts:
This section explicitly prohibits the District of Columbia from paying, assuming, or becoming responsible for the debts or liabilities of any corporation, association, or individual. This is a clear legal boundary that separates the financial responsibilities of the District from those of other entities.
2.Restriction on Extending Credit:
The section also forbids the District from giving, loaning, or extending its credit to aid any public or private corporation, association, or individual. This reinforces the autonomy of the Districtβs financial management and ensures that it does not become entangled in the financial affairs of other entities.
3.Local Scope:
Like previous sections, this provision applies specifically to the government of the District of Columbia. It does not have broader implications for the structure or nature of the U.S. government as a whole.
4.Contradiction to Corporate Theory:
By explicitly prohibiting the District from assuming or extending credit to other corporations, this section contradicts the notion that the U.S. itself could be a corporation owned or controlled by other entities. The legal language is clear and unambiguous in maintaining the independence and integrity of the Districtβs financial responsibilities.
Section 16 of the Organic Act of 1871 further undermines the claim that the United States is a corporation by setting clear financial boundaries for the District of Columbia. It emphasizes the Districtβs autonomy and responsibility in managing its own financial affairs, separate from other corporations or entities.
The specific and targeted nature of this provision, along with its clear legal language, leaves no room for interpretations that would support the erroneous claim that the United States is a corporation. It stands as a testament to the principles of financial integrity and independence that are foundational to the U.S. system of government. | 439 |
| 4 | Letβs move onto the next smoking gun section,
Section 9:
βAnd be it further enacted, That members of the legislative assembly, before they enter upon their official duties, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: " I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and will faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about about to enter; and that I have not knowingly, or intentionally paid or contributed anything, or made any promise in the nature of a bribe, to, directly or indirectly influence any vote at the election, at which I was chosen to fill the city office, and have not excepted, nor will I accept, or receive, directly, or indirectly, any money, or other valuable thing for any vote, or influence that I may give or withhold on any bill, resolution, or appropriation, or for any other office act.β Any member, who shall refuse to take the oath hearing prescribed, shall forfeit his office, and every person who shall be convicted of having sworn falsely to, or of violating his, said, oath, shall forfeit his office, and be disqualified thereafter from holding any office or profit or trust in set district and shall be, deemed guilty of perjury, and upon conviction shall be punished accordingly.β
Hereβs a detailed breakdown:
1.Oath to Support the U.S. Constitution:
The section mandates that members of the legislative assembly for the District of Columbia must swear an oath to support the Constitution of the United States. This is a clear affirmation of the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution over the local government of the District, and it aligns with the principles of federalism that underpin the U.S. governmental system.
2.Ethical Conduct:
The oath also includes a commitment to ethical conduct, including a rejection of bribery and corruption. This reflects the democratic values that are foundational to the U.S. system of government and is consistent with the principles of public service and integrity.
3.Penalties for Violation:
The section outlines penalties for refusing to take the oath or for violating it, including forfeiture of office and disqualification from holding future office. This reinforces the seriousness of the oath and the commitment to upholding the Constitution and laws of the United States.
4.Local Scope:
Like Section 1, this section pertains specifically to the government of the District of Columbia. It does not have broader implications for the structure or nature of the U.S. government as a whole.
Section 9 of the Organic Act of 1871 further dismantles the notion that the U.S. is a corporation by emphasizing the primacy of the U.S. Constitution and the ethical duties of public officeholders within the District of Columbia. It reinforces the continuity and integrity of the U.S. constitutional system and underscores the local and limited scope of the Act. | 357 |
| 5 | There has been much speculation on the Organic Act of 1871, and that it somehow put the United States in a corporate status. I am going to post this organic act, word for word, and break down each section and show how the US in fact NOT a corporation.
Section 1, Section 9 and Section 16 are smoking gun sections that completely shatters this theory to shredsβ¦ Letβs look at and break down section 1:
CHAP. LXII. -
An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia.
Section 1:
βBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all that part of the terri lory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.β
1.Scope of the Act:
The language clearly states that the Act pertains solely to the territory within the limits of the District of Columbia. It does not extend to the entire United States, and thus cannot be construed as transforming the entire nation into a corporation.
2.Creation of a Municipal Corporation:
The Act establishes the District of Columbia as a βbody corporate for municipal purposes.β This is a legal term referring to the creation of a local government entity with certain powers, such as the ability to enter into contracts and to sue and be sued. It does not imply the creation of a commercial corporation in the sense that is often associated with the term.
Title 1, Section 1 of the United States Code states:
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise [...] the words "county," "municipality," "township," "town," "city," "school district," "municipal corporation," or "political subdivision" include every incorporated place, whether incorporated as a city, town, village, or otherwise, and a county or parish, including a city and county having a consolidated city and county government, and any agency, department, division, or instrumentality thereof.Β Β Β
3.Consistency with the Constitution:
The Act explicitly states that the powers granted to the District of Columbia must not be βinconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.β This reinforces the subordination of the Districtβs government to the federal Constitution, negating any notion that the Act somehow supersedes or alters the fundamental structure of the U.S. government.
4.Municipal Purposes:
The reference to βmunicipal purposesβ further underscores the local and limited nature of the Act. It is concerned with governance at the city level, not with the transformation of the national government into a corporate entity.
Section 1 of the Organic Act of 1871 serves as a βsmoking gunβ that refutes the claim that the U.S. is a corporation by clearly delineating the limited scope and purpose of the Act. It establishes a form of local government for the District of Columbia, consistent with the U.S. Constitution, and does not in any way imply or enact a transformation of the United States into a commercial corporation. The language of the Act is precise and unambiguous, leaving no room for the speculative interpretations that have given rise to this misconception. | 395 |
| 6 | https://open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/we-the-people-step-3-analyzing-local?r=1mrf90&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web | 220 |
| 7 | https://twitter.com/threadreaderapp/status/1692424937493901696?s=20 | 265 |
| 8 | https://17sog.substack.com/p/unraveling-united-states-theories | 636 |
| 9 | Huh? | 279 |
| 10 | The cycle of action/reaction has dropped essentially to zero.
Garland appoints Weiss in an obvious move to muddy the water with regard to Hunter and his dad.
Before the business day is over, politicians and talking heads on the right are already on screens pointing out flaws in the move.
β’ Weiss was not a βTrump appointeeβ, he was selected by the two Democrat home state Senators.
β’ Weiss, a government employee, cannot legally be appointed a special prosecutor (a role that is supposed to be give to someone who comes from outside government).
β’ The move to appoint Weiss is an attempt to keep him from testifying infant of the Republican-led House.
And so on.
It is clear to me that the Biden Administration is in a state of panic. Their actions are increasingly reactive and ad hoc. There is little evidence of strategy or planning.
It appears to me that the Biden Administration is running through a rapidly shrinking checklist of options/moves, taking increasingly less effective and yet riskier actions as the previous one fails.
There will be readers out there who are familiar with checklists and emergency procedures. If you have any experience in aviation or medicine, for example, you have used these sorts of tools.
I have experience in some relatively risky endeavours such as climbing, skydiving, and paragliding. In these sorts of sports, there are specific steps that are taken in response to particular emergencies. If the first steps do not deal with the problem, subsequent steps are set out and taken.
The problem with the steps that appear near the bottom of the emergency procedure checklist is that they are only undertaken when the earlier, more effective steps have been tried and failed.
Subsequent emergency procedures are increasingly urgent/desperate and less likely to save you that preferred options higher on the checklist.
These late steps, reserved for only the most desperate circumstances, are generally employed only mere seconds before one goes SPLAT.
This feels to me like a reasonably apt characterisation of the Biden Administration. Those few in their midst with training or intelligence are desperately plucking the few remaining options out of the air and setting them into motion, now to only see them batted aside in minutes by the increasingly emboldened right. The cycle of failure/act/failure is spinning faster every day.
This is what Iβd expect to see with an Information War. It is what Iβd expect to see ahead of the Resignation Cascade.
Interesting times. | 335 |
| 11 | https://open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/american-patriotism-reclaiming-the?r=1mrf90&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web | 284 |
| 12 | https://rumble.com/v33lmnv-deep-dive-5-why-is-your-towncitycounty-incorporated-more-on-local-governmen.html | 4 883 |
| 13 | "Voyage of the Patriots: A Symphony of Liberty"
In the land of the brave, the home of the free,
Where dreams take flight and hope finds its decree,
Stands a truth often overlooked, yet profound,
The heartbeat of the nation, with a steady sound.
Not on the battlefield, where heroes fight,
But in civic duty, a beacon of light,
For without the voice of the people, so true,
The soldier's valor would have no value.
Patriots rise, an insurgency's might,
In political warfare, they fight the good fight,
Strategizing, planning, with purpose and aim,
Empowering hearts with a patriot's flame.
For in the local, seeds of impact are sown,
When precision and passion together are shown,
The art of political action, a force to behold,
More potent than the mightiest sea, bold.
A symphony of minds, an orchestra of will,
Uniting for a cause, the nation to fulfill,
In this dance of liberty, a powerful embrace,
As patriots envision a brighter, freer space.
With military precision, they chart their course,
In the pursuit of justice, they stay the course,
For planning, execution, and honor they stand,
A testament to the strength of freedom's hand.
Through trials and storms, they press on, unbowed,
Guided by values, their principles avowed,
With each step, America's future they carve,
In the face of adversity, their resilience to starve.
Let not the dread of apathy abide,
For in unity, our strength will reside,
With hearts ablaze, our voices strong,
We'll write history's enduring song.
America, a nation forged by the brave,
Depends on its citizens, steadfast and grave,
So rise, patriots, with passion and might,
For liberty's triumph begins with your light. | 4 285 |
| 14 | https://17sog.substack.com/p/the-coach-mel-show-35c | 238 |
| 15 | https://17sog.substack.com/p/we-the-people-the-american-elections-17b?sd=pf | 678 |
| 16 | https://open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/we-the-people-the-american-elections?r=1mrf90&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web | 236 |
| 17 | https://open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/the-coach-mel-show-3ad?r=1mrf90&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web | 279 |
| 18 | https://open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/we-the-people-the-american-election?r=1mrf90&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web | 1 430 |
| 19 | https://rumble.com/v30nshu-deep-dive-day-2-with-17th-scog.-local-control-and-you.html | 800 |
| 20 | "Unity of Effort" among citizens would mean that they are collectively working towards the common goal of holding their local government accountable and reinforcing transparency. This could involve activities such as attending city council meetings, staying informed about local issues, participating in local elections, or organizing around specific causes. The key here is that all citizens are directing their efforts towards the same objective.
"Unified Action" among citizens would then refer to the coordinated actions taken by citizens to achieve these goals. This could involve launching a petition for a new policy, organizing a peaceful protest, or creating a community watchdog group to monitor local elections.
The actions taken by different citizens or groups are synchronized and integrated as part of a coherent plan.
If there's a divide among the citizens, it could disrupt both Unity of Effort and Unified Action.
For example, if some citizens believe the best way to hold the government accountable is using the military to cease power, while others believe it should be done by the people through legal channels, this could lead to a lack of Unity of Effort. Similarly, if different citizen groups take actions that are not coordinated or even conflict with each other, this could disrupt Unified Action.
A divided citizenry could lead to a less effective push for government accountability and transparency. It could result in mixed messages being sent to the local government, diluting the impact of citizens' efforts.
It could also lead to conflict among citizens, further distracting from the goal of government accountability.
To maintain Unity of Effort and Unified Action, citizens must communicate and coordinate with each other, to respect different perspectives and approaches, and to work together towards their common goals. | 297 |
