Quantus tremor est futurus - Actaeon Journal

Martin Sellner said that there have been no protests in Italy against Meloni and increased immigration. This points to the danger for every Western nation, there will be a response to the crisis but it will remain an economic question and an effort to limit radical elements. Is there a will to protest and withstand the subversion of identitarian movements? And do these movements take a real political position? Pay attention to what happens in Germany, the Western response will follow its course.

Populism is indecision as a style.

The same police and legal system was used to eliminate Leftist revolutionaries in the 2000s and nationalists in the 2010s. Total surveillance was followed by total immigration, and the same systems will be used in response to the immigration crisis. Ideology can only be understood in this context.

"You need to think what immigration will be like in the year 2100." Nick Fuentes This is entirely the wrong approach. The catastrophe is already behind us and we are living in the ruins. 1900 was the end.

This is also where one begins to see Nietzsche's great mistakes. When reading Tocqueville it becomes clear that Nietzsche hardly understood democracy, he attacked wherever it was shallow and so became one of its great champions. The subjection of kings speaks to democracy's theological power and the great man appears as a weakness – the fin de siècle as a type. If one does not understand democracy can he understand leveling and nihilism?

If I said that the kings served democracy I would be called a fool, but democracy cannot be understood without acknowledging its total power, a power over all men, even kings.

And one should remember that woke is only a single moment within the thousand-year march of the equality of conditions.

Woke should be seen in the context of America's failure to resolve its racial conflicts. Alexis de Tocqueville's analysis remains the most valuable and may be understood as an alternative origin of state – a second state and civil war waiting to erupt.

"Kings ruined themselves in great enterprises. Nobles spent themselves in private wars. Commoners enriched themselves in commerce. Money began to exert an influence over affairs of state. Trade was a new source of wealth, which led to power, and financiers became a power in politics that was an object of scorn as well as flattery. Little by little enlightenment spread. The taste for literature and the arts revived. Mind became an ingredient of success. Science was a means of government and intelligence a social force. Men of letters took up affairs of state. ..."

One of the ironies of the conservative is his being crucified on a cross of yellow ribbon. Totalization of anti-war, the worst form of war as war.

Marxism creates the value-theory of sweat and blood.

Our Nietzscheans will make daily references to Fight Club, but they wouldn't dare start a fight with a priest only to lose.

Reason and unreason as the form and movement of the stormcloud.

What is friend-enemy in the face of the personal and absolute God?

With the death of God our fear should become absolute.

You want to subject Nietzsche to academic rigour. I ask if he imposes true violence. We are not the same.

"Heartless Soulless Spineless Bounded Shutdown Blind - dead"

This cannot be. If it were true then Nietzsche would only be another Schopenhauer. We should imagine that his idea survives the dissolution of the will, otherwise he says nothing of Dionysus or the Titans.

Arvo Part says of his music that one line is his sins, the next, forgiveness. Can we say the same of Nietzsche? One line is pure force, the next, dissolution.

Nietzsche deserves to be treated as a Thersites, but must not be treated as a Thersites. His followers have already done far worse.