$===>$$$$$$$

MTIH is receiving from multiple wallets notably the PAND Binance wallet that we see A TON of legitimacy under and has exchanged more than 2 Million XLM with T3DN. And we also see it's sending out payments to ZPND, The parent wallet to Elon Stellar's eAssets. 👀

Lets look at the R545 wallet, Its pretty straight forward. It hosted the CORDA asset ICO directly working with T3DN It sent the ICO income out to MTIH, so lets see what that wallet is up to.

December 6 R3 Corda update: Another legitimate QSFS dev has confirmed Whip and his fake devs are launching scam assets again🤡🤡🤡 This time real R3 CEO & main dev contacted me directly to inform and also KYC his wallet with Whip, who unfortunately doesnt understand ledgers or security protocols or KYC, so Whip actually called Paul Harris cabal and told him to “go to court and prove his claim” 😩😩😩😩 ✅ correct R3 issuer: GAOUCB6V6DCM263OLHK5LLLCXCYFZORMFZ2QPAIMX4P6YINTWV6AWLLW ICO: https://t.me/QuantumStellarInitiative/15228 ✅ correct Corda issuer: GBM5KSB7H2C7CHHB4JLMV3D5PBO7OLGWKGYLVXTWPMSOVDKHXVRMRJQH ICO: https://t.me/QuantumStellarInitiative/17642 ✅ correct dev wallet that was paying Whip his overpriced commissions: GBB35VENFLNQCWYALHD2ICLL3TC4HLF6GLF7MUAJXDA3R5RX5TFRR545 See pics for proof Paul Harris TG account controls original dev wallet AND KYC both WLLW and RJQH with Whip 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️ see also this is the same wallet that distributed cashbacks in 2022, such as to our now inactive QSI Donations wallet ending in LYRR (lost keys) And how did Whip respond? By blocking Paul! 🤣🤣🤣 Moral of the story: ❌☝️ dont be like Whip and ruin your reputation, integrity, morals, community, and future because of pride and ego. And definitely dont call a KYC’d QSFS dev and CEO of R3 the cabal 🤪🚨💃 Especially after my epic call with 5+ General PQ+ Nick where we proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that Ralph Hamers is super ultra legit white hat dev using PUBLIC PROOFS (recording will be posted within 12hr) so anyone who continues to call Ralph a scammer, money launderer, or “satanic Bilderberg Elite” after today is a total idiot 💯💯 📱 QSI Channel 📱 Stellar & QFS Training App

The claim.. 👇🏻

. You guys know I'll search for the truth no matter what it finds. I feel like I need to point this out. .

Its fun watching the XRP maxxies start seeing the picture. Straight from the people trying to establish the XRP buyback price.

Be a shame if about 100 accounts decided to cash out all at once and steal all that liquidity.

"These technologies compliment each other in ways we've yet to understand" .. Once you realize they are both just settlement mechanisms for unique purposes, you mostly understand. 😉

So if you’re following this thought process, apply that across all of Stellar. A company may hold its own tokens and launch them themselves, they may also choose to have a dev team launch the share for them on their behalf. A company may also hold a percentage of shares of another company and launch those as well. They may also sell a percentage of their own shares to other companies to do the same. Hence we find the same assets under multiple domains all across stellar. The real question is going to be how do these value against each other, which I discussed above. If all ultimately value out to be the same through forced burning of supply, it could be a VERY BIG DEAL.

"Reliance is the number 1 company in India. Reliance owns 27% of Swiss Custody SGB. Reliance can launch 38% of their own. Simple." I see lots of questions over SGB and SunGold being released by Reliance. The quote above originating from Detective makes way more sense looking at these percentage numbers being given. But it seems it would work backwards from how people might be thinking, which could be some of the confusion, but i may be mistaken. First, this reinforces the fact that Reliance isn't who controls SGB, they are perhaps just the biggest company holding some. Next, if Reliance owns 27% of SGB from Swiss Custody, then thats what they own, that would be their 100%. The 27% they have = their 100% of holdings. Out of their 100% they can launch/offer 38% of that to the public. The rest being retained for unknown (at this time) reasons. Now picture this. It can play a factor on value of the same token from different domains offering it.. As an example, let’s just say that Reliance's 27% of the SGB they own is 250B tokens total. If they offer 1T tokens, it would dilute the value of the 250B across the offered supply of 1T.. effectively making the value of 1 token only 25% of the value of a real SGB. Unless their offering matches the amount they hold, in this example if they held 250B then they would only be able to offer 250B to stay 1:1. On the other hand if they only offered 125B then their offering would have 2X the value of a real SGB. So based on how many the different domains offer will determine how "diluted" the price could be. I'm betting big that this is going to be the case from sites like Go-Dls.com. that domain, just like Swiss Custody may have very diluted versions of the tokens based on the huge supply's offered. But the fact we were able to buy in at 100's of Billions, even if they turn out to be 5% of the value of the actual companies offerings its still an unmeasurable win. The other thing that could very well happen is that the domains may be forced to burn off supply till it matches their holdings 1:1 and everything becomes even at some point.

“Reliance is the number 1 company in India. Reliance owns 27% of Swiss Custody SGB. Reliance can launch 38% of their own. Simple.” Swiss Custody SGB - 45 Companies tied to it internationally at that point in time. Detective provided 3 lists List 1 - t.me/Whiplash347/104932 List 2 - t.me/Whiplash347/104938 List 3 - t.me/Whiplash347/105671

Sometimes you just have questions.

I thought he was the “CFO of MAS”.. but I’m sure he knows his own title I guess. 🤷

. who is CEO of MAF ? .