en
Feedback
Kate Mason

Kate Mason

Open in Telegram

Staying human in a technocratic world

Show more
1 305
Subscribers
No data24 hours
-87 days
-2830 days

Data loading in progress...

Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
February '25
February '25
+2
in 6 channels
January '25
+13
in 7 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+10
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+60
in 26 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+166
in 47 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+121
in 56 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+80
in 24 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+157
in 27 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+96
in 24 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+38
in 18 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+51
in 24 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+105
in 22 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+41
in 17 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+29
in 18 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+4
in 14 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+12
in 18 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+17
in 15 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+18
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+40
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+48
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+43
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+16
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+363
in 0 channels
Date
Subscriber Growth
Mentions
Channels
11 February0
10 February0
09 February0
08 February+1
07 February0
06 February0
05 February0
04 February0
03 February0
02 February+1
01 February0
Channel Posts
FSANZ - Australia and NZ food body are about to flood the market with GMOs without safety testing or LABELLING. This will lea
FSANZ - Australia and NZ food body are about to flood the market with GMOs without safety testing or LABELLING. This will lead to 94 percent of GMOs being "disappeared". FSANZ has a "stakeholder" consultation open until tomorrow, to determine how satisfied stakeholders are with FSANZs processes. FSANZs priorities are to industry, as clearly evidenced by their first stakeholder question not even including consumers of food. https://consultations.foodstandards.gov.au/fsanz/fsanz-stakeholder-satisfaction-survey-2024/consultation/confirm_submit You can let them know how much you trust that FSANZ is working for you. Here is an article outlining concerns regarding what FSANZ is currently up to in their bait and switch techniques- basically they are stating that conventional food is the same as synthetic food. https://psgrnz.substack.com/p/did-fsanz-just-dismiss-statute-and

2
https://kate739.substack.com/p/regenerative-agriculture-is-being
3 576
3
I'm finishing up a video explaining how the big ag and chemical companies are using regenerative agriculture as a cover for s+2
I'm finishing up a video explaining how the big ag and chemical companies are using regenerative agriculture as a cover for synthetic biology, nanotech and Internet of Things technologies to be rolled out on all farms. It is all touted as more "sustainable"- which is of massive concern as the Australian government is busy rolling out initiatves and legislation to force farmers to move to "sustainable" agricultural practices. Though I have been looking at what is happening to our food sources over the last few years, I am still taken aback by how transparent it is that government is captured by industry. Take this for an e.g. Corteva (massive chemical company) is a founder of the Zero Net Emissions Research Centre. The Australian government has given the Centre $87 million of public money. In other news, if you use Corteva products you get more carbon credits, and because these powerful corporate entites are explicitly controlling the financial markets, Microsoft buys Corteva's carbon credits.
5 428
4
If you are in the Sunshine Coast and concerned about the 4th Industrial Revolution technologies, this event on the 4th of Dec
If you are in the Sunshine Coast and concerned about the 4th Industrial Revolution technologies, this event on the 4th of December would be worth going to. https://invest.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/toolkit/geospatial-intelligence-in-real-life/?
1 149
5
You can see where your country is up to with deregulating gene technologies. Australia is not quite up to date- last time the
You can see where your country is up to with deregulating gene technologies. Australia is not quite up to date- last time the website was updated was May 2024, and we have had a number of changes since then. https://crispr-gene-editing-regs-tracker.geneticliteracyproject.org
2 771
6
In 2004, whilst I was still sleeping, public concerns about Nano Tech were being discussed in Australia. Nano Tech will be used extensively (if it's not already) in soil and plants to "solve" climate change. There are SERIOUS health and environmental concerns. https://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2004/1257304.htm?
4 500
7
Please listen to clips regarding the changes to the Gene Technology Act 2000, where dystopian plans to synthetically alter ag
Please listen to clips regarding the changes to the Gene Technology Act 2000, where dystopian plans to synthetically alter agriculture, wild species and the eco system are outlined. As well as how the Act needs to be amended to make it easier for industry to "innovate". In these two minutes you will get a good sense of where this is all heading, under the guise of climate. And there's a weird statement- that "human beings are not considered to be GMOs for the purposes of this scheme". Public submissions are open for comment until 8th November- https://consultations.health.gov.au/best-practice-regulation/amendments-to-the-gene-technology-act-200/ Webinar- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRsFgqrZxlo
17 496
8
Canada's Pandemic Preparedness Bill allows for "biosecurity threat" measures which shut down agriculture and push synthetic alternative proteins. In 2022 the WHO, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO- who has a partnership with CropLife to transform the world's food systems), UNEP, and the World Organisation for Animal Health signed an MOU focusing on the One Health Model and biosecurity threats. Canada is only enacting the global script. https://lethbridgenewsnow.com/2024/10/25/alberta-pushes-feds-for-amendments-to-pandemic-preparedness-bill-cites-risks-to-agriculture/
1 551
9
MIT "Sculpting evolution" through genetic editing (CRISPR). Nature is just so difficult, not easily controlled and unpredictable. Hence the need to genetically engineer the ecosystem and wild animals. https://www.sculptingevolution.org Video from MIT Media Lab "Sculpting Evolution" Kevin Esvelt: Pandemics, Gene Drives, Existential Threats- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g89D1LFYoKU An analysis of the above video from 1 hour 25 mins- https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/crZdq61uQiDS3M2R12SCyh? Kevin was instrumental in discovering CRISPR. He was working with George Church. You can listen to George Church here- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5dcjcTxS30 There are people working very hard on turning human bodies, ecosystems, animals, plants, soil into a synthetic biology experiment. Our governments are assisting them through legislative changes.
3 586
10
The Covid19 Response Inquiry report has been released- 877 pages. Will take a while to look through it, a quick glance it is+2
The Covid19 Response Inquiry report has been released- 877 pages. Will take a while to look through it, a quick glance it is about the establishment of an Australian Centre for Disease Control, One Health, Surveillance, integrated responses, readiness to move to onine learning for school children, disease data integration system, sewerage surveillance, a "covid catch up strategy, in response to a decline in the delivery of key health prevention measures", mental health supports for children (think more children diagnosed and medicated), in house behavioural insights capability (what propaganda works best). There's a lot more but that's as much as I can stomach today. Oh, Brett Sutton from CSIRO and CDC's Dr Stephanie Williams recently launched a series of talks "Showcasing the wonders of One Health" One Health is the intersection between humans, animals and ecosystems, meaning that all of life is now under the purview of the CDC and CSIRO. https://www.pmc.gov.au/resources/covid-19-response-inquiry-report
11 218
11
There are serious, disturbing global plans to synthetically alter the ecosystem, animals, plants, food, and human bodies. In progression of this goal Australia’s Gene Technology Act 2000 is being revised. The webinar linked states that the current Gene Technology Act 2000 impedes innovation. Amendments are proposed to ensure the legislation can keep up with further advancements in health, medicine, agriculture and animals and make it easier for industry. This includes: - Pest control, medical research and commercial therapies - Biomanufacturing and species conservation - Health- encourage companies to undertake clinical trials in Australia to develop novel treatments - Biotechnologies including synthetic biology have been listed as critical technology in the national interest (federal and state) - Protection of threatened species, management of feral animals and weeds and sustainable agriculture are key areas where gene technology can make substantial contributions to the environment. - Vaccines which protect Australian fauna are being developed - Genetically engineered crops which have increased yields with less energy input makes agriculture more sustainable by lowering carbon emissions. Have a listen to what is being discussed. https://www.genetechnology.gov.au/resources/videos/information-session-proposed-amendments-gene-technology-act submissions close 8th November.
4 644
12
The more I read it becomes clear that we are in a synthetic biology experiment of mammoth proportions: not only the eco system, not only food, not only animals, but also our human bodies. How can something this profound (and concerning) be occurring without any public debate? With the vast majority of people being completely unaware? https://www.ausbiotech.org/documents/item/768?
3 787
13
Another public consultation that the public is unaware of. This time it's to amend the Gene Technology Act 2000. I haven't go
Another public consultation that the public is unaware of. This time it's to amend the Gene Technology Act 2000. I haven't got my head around it yet, but considering the climate we are in it will be changes that make it easier to release unregulated synthetically altered organisms. Consultations close 8th November. I'd love any input if you read it. https://www.genetechnology.gov.au/news/consultation-proposed-changes-gene-technology-act-2000
13 288
14
Banks need to get the mortgages on their books down to net zero, how are they going to do this? Well, at the least they wont be giving mortgages for houses which don't have a certain energy rating (starting with 5 stars). As home owners are unable to afford insurance due to being in flood zones or due to fire risk, the property risk is transferred to the banks. The banks are not going to hold the risk, what do you think the banks will do with people's mortgages if they are uninsured? Why are our Federal MP's being silent on the changes which the Australian government is implementing, changes which will have serious implications for private home ownership? https://reneweconomy.com.au/big-banks-take-on-greening-of-australias-10-trillion-housing-stock/?
8 523
15
Article from 2012- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/09/at-war-over-geoengineering?
2 857
16
Brisbane free future of food event: CSIRO will be showcasing novel (synthetic) foods, biotech and surveillance tech , futuristic farming (AI, Robotics, biosensors). Anyone who wants to get abreast of where the CSIRO is pushing our food systems, please attend and let me know what is covered. CSIRO have many relevant documents on the future of centralised, synthetic foods, including: Australia's Synthetic Biology Roadmap Edible Insects Roadmap Australia's Protein Roadmap Reshaping Australian Food Systems On Farm Applications of Advanced Bioengineering Ag 2050 Scenarios Report The CSIRO uses the same excuse for the synthetic transformation of our food systems as was used to usher in the mono crop, chemical laden, GMO Green Revolution, "we must do this to feed the world" (SDG2) and they've added in for good measure "we must do this to save the climate" (SDG13). Anyone concerned about non transparent synthetic food systems being implemented (protected by confidential commercial information- i.e. patented- we can't see the tech and processes used), nano tech, bio tech, surveillance, bio sensors etc., should be keeping a close eye on what the CSIRO is rolling out. A close eye should also be kept on their venture capital firm, Main Sequence. Which "coincidentally" arose from a partnership between CSIRO and Bill Bartee. Bill is co-owner of venture capital firm Blackbird. The other partner of Blackbird is ex CSIRO CEO Larry Marshall. Blackbird partly funded the first lab meat that is going to be allowed in to the Australian market. Main Ventures funds many synthetic food start ups. When Larry Marshall was CEO of CSIRO there was a controversy when he sacked climate scientists and said the science is settled and it was time to go to climate mitigation strategies. One climate mitigation strategy is synthetic food. It's a circular wheel, where those who benefit are pushing transformative changes to our food systems. CSIRO event- https://events.csiro.au/Events/2024/July/31/AgCatalyst-2024? My article covering the Lab Meat CSIRO connection- https://kate739.substack.com/p/lab-created-quail-entering-the-australian
7 506
17
Qld government initiative to give free lunches to students is not their initiative. This is a global agenda- all about the tracking and tracing of food systems, and incorporating synthetic “personalised” food into the food chain. As set out in Rockefeller’s Reset the Table- which was released in 2020 and uses the narrative “covid showed up the cracks in our society” to call for even more centralised control and surveillance. Rockefeller Foundation is central to emerging synthetic food technologies- as they were central to bringing in the heavily chemical laden green revolution. And guess what- they used the same rhetoric as they do now- "we need to do this chemical/GMO transformation to feed the world". Now it's tweaked with "we have to do this to save the climate." And so you can read the code: when Rockefeller, the UN etc. speak about "sustainable" food, they are actually referring to synthetic food. The Reset the Table paper states: “Invest public and private funding in school food programs as anchors of community feeding.” “Public schools are anchors of community feeding and play an essential role in ensuring children are nutrition secure." It's also a way to direct public spending on agendas we may not want (i.e. synthetic food): "Capability 2: Activate the power of public purchasing Every dollar spent on a food purchase is an investment that shapes our food system and its public health, equity, and environmental outcomes...As public institutions injecting our tax dollars into the food system, these institutions should bear a responsibility to purchase based on “best value” that takes into account the true cost accounting approach outlined above and advances nutritional quality, ethical sourcing, fair wages and benefits for workers in the supply chain, local economic impact, and environmental sustainability." Sustainable food is code for synthetic food in this new world order. And just to seal the deal FSANZ (Australia and New Zealand food body) is redefining synthetic food as non GMO to flood the market with synthetic food without safety testing or labelling. I'm really getting tired of the virtue signalling used to bring in horrific agendas- https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RF-Reset-the-Table-FULL-PAPER_July-28_FINAL.pdf? https://www.afr.com/politics/qld-labor-promises-free-school-lunches-in-a-1-4-billion-vote-grab-20241013-p5khvn
3 609
18
Port Headland Council on Friday night passed a motion to send correspondence to PM and all councils in Australia raising conc+1
Port Headland Council on Friday night passed a motion to send correspondence to PM and all councils in Australia raising concerns about contaminated DNA within the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections. Article from Katoomba Review in comments with links to Port Headland Council meeting. A letter will be going to our individual councils- it's our job to ask for a response. https://warrenross.substack.com/p/the-great-revival?
23 363
19
Under the circular economy- product becomes a service-and a short step later our social credit scores determine whether we ca
Under the circular economy- product becomes a service-and a short step later our social credit scores determine whether we can access the service. PACCT for Sustainability (Product-as-a-service (PaaS) to Accelerate Cooperation and Circular Transformation) aims to bring together a European community focused on the Product-as-a-Service model. This will involve redefining market standards as part of a global transformation guided by the imperatives of ecological transition. https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/news-and-events/all-events/role-data-circular-economy-focus-product-service “Ownership could be displaced or augmented by access to service. Social credit may become a more powerful determinant of socio economic inclusion.” http://canadabeyond150.ca/reports/capital-and-debt.html?
1 529
20
Information from UK Column regarding energy certificates on people's homes. Australia is heading in this direction. Full vide
Information from UK Column regarding energy certificates on people's homes. Australia is heading in this direction. Full video here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-4th-october-2024? My article on Australia here: https://kate739.substack.com/p/threats-to-private-home-ownership
7 019