re:doubt
re:doubt is a powerful tool for TON blockchain research Chat: https://t.me/re_doubt_chat https://redoubt.online/
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel re:doubt
Channel re:doubt (@re_doubt) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 38 005 subscribers, ranking 5 666 in the Cryptocurrencies category.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 38 005 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 02 December, 2024, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 0 over the last 30 days and by 0 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 0%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 0 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“re:doubt is a powerful tool for TON blockchain research
Chat: https://t.me/re_doubt_chat
https://redoubt.online/”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 03 December, 2024), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Cryptocurrencies category.
1) Transparency and Legitimacy: - Full disclosure of the project's team members, with verifiable credentials. - Clearly defined use case and purpose for the token. - Transparency in development progress and milestones. 2) Audited Code: - Regular and public code audits by reputable third-party security firms. - Open-source codebase for community scrutiny. 3) Community Support: - Strong and engaged community with positive sentiment. - Active social media presence and community-driven initiatives. 4) Partnerships and Collaborations: - Official partnerships with reputable companies or organizations. - Collaboration with established blockchain projects. 5) Listing on Reputable Exchanges: - Presence on well-known and trusted cryptocurrency exchanges. - Regularly updated exchange listings. 6) Transparency of Token Supply: - Clearly defined tokenomics with a limited and transparent token supply. - Regularly updated information on circulating and total supply.Risky Jetton Criteria:
1) Anonymous Development Team: - Lack of disclosure or transparency about the project's team members. 2)Unrealistic Promises: - Overhyped claims without a clear use case or utility. - Promises of high, guaranteed returns. 3) Unverified Source Code: - Lack of open-source code or reluctance to undergo code audits. 4) Lack of Community Support: - Negative sentiment or lack of community engagement. - Numerous user complaints or reports of suspicious activities. 5) Fake Partnerships: - Claims of partnerships that cannot be verified. - Lack of collaboration with reputable entities. 6) High Token Supply with Poor Distribution: - Large total supply with a significant portion held by a small number of addresses. - Suspicious token distribution patterns. 7) Listing on Untrusted Exchanges: - Limited or absence of listings on reputable exchanges. - Presence on exchanges with a history of security issues or scams.
