en
Feedback
Elyorbek's blog

Elyorbek's blog

Open in Telegram

Live sessions for IELTS

Show more
831
Subscribers
No data24 hours
No data7 days
No data30 days
Posts Archive

When people using keyboard-based phones are given smartphones, they cannot get the hang of those new devices
When people using keyboard-based phones are given smartphones, they cannot get the hang of those new devices

Harnessed correctly, your imagination is the biggest power of yours.

1. To add insult to injury – to do or say something that makes a bad situation even worse for someone β€”> o'lganni ustiga tepgan qilmoq

You agree or disagree??

Many people are cowards I think

5 people have seen, I don't think they understand English that's why they didn't answer maybe πŸ˜‚

Is there anyone awake?

It has been suggested that everyone in the world wants to own a car, a TV, and a fridge. Do you think the disadvantages of such a development outweigh the advantages? In today’s materialistic world, every individual has a desire for a luxurious lifestyle: lavish cars, flat-screen TVs, and other expensive belongings. Although this trend has some advantages, its drawbacks are far more substantial. The benefits of such a luxurious way of living are twofold. One of them is increased efficiency in the day-to-day lives of people. When people own such properties as cars, they can reach their destinations quickly and easily. This saves them time and money to a certain degree. Another positive side of having modern household appliances like refrigerators is flexibility. That is, people may cook more food than enough once a day and keep it in the fridge for the next lunch. As a result, they could engage in their leisure time activities instead of preparing a second meal for their day. However, the downsides of the aspiration for widespread ownership are more significant than the abovementioned conveniences. Firstly, this development is more likely to cause environmental issues. To meet the demand for cars and other household equipment and machines, a lot of resources are utilized, leading to resource depletion. Secondly, the pursuit of ownership may create a noticeable disparity between the rich and the poor. Not everyone has the financial means to afford those kinds of items: automobiles and costly devices. This, in turn, leads to serious social inequalities. In conclusion, owning a car, TV and fridges can offer free time and conveniences for people. However, its disadvantages like running out natural resources and social problems are more significant than its benefits. πŸ”·@elyorbeks_blogπŸ”·

The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. Do you agree or disagree? In the majority of the current organizations, leadership roles are frequently occupied by people of older age. However, some people challenge this tradition by saying that younger minds can work more effectively in those positions. I agree that the young generation is more skilled and adept at heading the institutions. When controlled by elderly chiefs, companies may gain good results due to two main reasons. One of them is the vast hands-on experience old people bring to the table. Until senior age, older executives tend to have been involved in different working procedures, large-scale projects, and other work-related programs, meaning that they have taken part in or at least witnessed the accomplishment of those cases. Therefore their immense real-life experience is thought to bring out valuable benefits, putting them in high ranks. Secondly, older managers are usually scrupulous in taking risks, considering every outcome behind their decisions. Due to that quality, their careers seem dazzling with fewer failures, making them look more professional and highly successful. In turn, they are frequently viewed as the right fit for high positions in any organization. On the other hand, young and highly motivated individuals could effortlessly perform better than their older counterparts as leaders of the entities. Firstly, the young generation is well-informed and has excellent problem-solving skills. With these abilities, they can come up with innovative solutions for problems of any kind. If they were appointed high-level roles in any organization, they would make unprecedented positive changes for the institutions. Furthermore, young people are more energetic and could outwork the old-aged leaders easily. This is because their thirst for success is far stronger as they have not seen so many accomplishments as the older ones. In effect, they are able to generate more value thanks to their tireless efforts. In conclusion, although the advantages of having old leaders range from extensive work experience to less risky decisions, I consider that problem-solving and diligently industrious young leaders can provide a brighter future for their organizations. 332 words πŸ”·@elyorbeks_blogπŸ”·

The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. Do you agree or disagree?

i am planning to write and share more essays in the channel. you can benefit from the work

+1
x'mas_Mantovani_–_Sleigh_Ride_J.mp314.70 MB

+1
TASK_TWO_ESSAYS_Written_by_alisherposts_Completed_by_Olimjon_Shokirov.pdf1.54 MB

1. Learning in a group setting - studying with a group of students in a classroom 2. Productive – beneficial – fruitful – fertile 3. Study environment – an environment in which people learn a particular subject 4. Appropriate – suitable – fit 5. Groupwork assignments – teamwork tasks 6. Accomplish a task – do/carry out a task 7. Knowledge acquisition – making progress in learning 8. Speed up – to happen faster 9. Expertise – knowledge or skill 10. Domain – area of knowledge – field 11. Conventional – traditional 12. Cooperate – co-work – working together with someone 13. Enlightenment on something – understanding of something 14. Distraction-free zones – zones where you are not distracted 15. Select – choose Collocations and words from the essay πŸ”·@elyorbeks_blogπŸ”·

Learning in a group setting is thought to be more productive than distant home learning. However, I would argue that this kind of study environment may benefit extroverted students, while online education would be an appropriate option for introverted learners. Studying in a classroom with other people can be effective for two main reasons. Firstly, it enhances students’ interpersonal skills. When students sit in a classroom, they are frequently given groupwork assignments. While accomplishing those tasks, students help each other in terms of what they are learning. As a result, their knowledge acquisition is likely to speed up. Secondly, classroom members can communicate their questions to their teachers in real time and get an accurate explanation for their queries. This, in turn, enables students to move on to next levels more quickly and gain more expertise in their domain. But this conventional way of education suits extroverted students more as they have no fear in cooperating with other persons. Reserved and solitude-seeking students could enjoy virtual method of learning, making their anticipated progress in their direction. One explanation for why they master a subject by online classes is that there is no one to bother them. When they are in their private room with fast network connection, they can effortlessly focus on their subject and get quick explanations from their mentor. Consequently, their targeted goals from the process are bound to be reached easily. Apart from that, online education is usually inexpensive and time-saving for learners, as it does not require a place, commuting and other expenses. That means its users are able to invest the saved resources: time and money in their education front. In the aftermath of that, they may learn more of their subject and become specialist in those areas. In conclusion, studying in offline group settings could offer such advantages as enhancing communication skills and quick enlightenment on the questions about the topic, whereas online home-learning can provide a distraction-free zone and cost-effective knowledge acquisition. I personally believe that those abovementioned benefits can only be obtained as long as the students’ characters are taken into consideration while selecting the type.

I will try to write a good essay on this queston

Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I went running and finished it in 20 minutes. Currently, the electricity is our here.πŸ€¦β€β™‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚