Barelwism Exposed

Shaykh al-Islām Muṣṭafā al-Ṣabrī: “Certainly, I prefer that the education of girls should be confined to those matters which are important for them, such as household management, raising children & perfecting their characters & also confined to the principles of preserving soundness, orderliness & frugality. The gist is to prepare girls to be excellent mothers & outstanding wives, not so they are equivalent to men in all tasks, since this is unquestionably impossible and unavailing.” [Qawlī Fil Mara’ah, pg.65]

Arabic explanation of why Madkhali Salafi are bootlickers of their rulers

Apparently this brother has repented from his views in the above video. See below:

This is Salafism....

Shamsi and his group are sick. This is disgusting.

Do the 4 guys who allegedly attacked Shamsi in a totally real, not fake attack have their own cafe? I want to normalize relations with them & buy a latte. May Allah curse the attackers! But let me go buy a latte & burger from them. I can't boycott their cafe without permission of the ruler. That would be khurooj. https://twitter.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1720777760933593171?t=LQUQ5SapdoVQFibYrXwaRg&s=19

Random individuals should not physically attack anyone. I ask all Muslims, especially those who find value in my work, to refrain from such attacks. They are not permitted in Islam, and they do not help the Muslim cause. That being said, many have raised questions about the attack on Shamsi, suggesting that it may have been faked. Intelligence agencies continuously create fake or misleading video evidence of attacks, and then spread this video content over social media. This is done to create sympathy and counter mass criticism. As we have seen in recent weeks, this is a standard tactic used by Zionists in the Gaza conflict. They continously create fake or misleading videos about Palestinian attacks (e.g. 40 decapitated babies, mass rape of ravers). They then spread this material over social media to create sympathy and counter mass criticism of their actions. The network of Madkhali agents is facing unprecedented criticism due to their support for the Israeli genocide of Palestinians. Shamsi has released a video claiming he was assaulted by 4 Muslims in the streets of London. An additional short video of him being mildly beaten was then released by unknown parties. Those who did the beating were wearing hoodies and had their faces covered, so they cannot be identified. Also Shamsi seems to have been alone, so there are no witnesses besides himself and the attackers. In this situation, we really have little beyond Shamsi's own testimony to rely on. Following the release of these videos there has been a coordinated Madkhali effort to garner sympathy using the attack. All the big English-language Madkhali accounts are involved: Murtad Zahack Tanvir, Rabbi Faris al-Hammadi, Abu Khadeejah. They claim that the attack is proof of the terrible danger and violence that can occur when Madkhalis are verbally criticized for their anti-Palestinian pro-Zionist activism. They then demand that all people stop criticism of Madkhalis and their activism. This message is being disseminated through dozens if not hundreds of Madkhali social media accounts. I do not know if the attack really happened. Perhaps it did. But before accepting that the attack really occurred, some more evidence is needed. With that in mind I have four questions for Shamsi and his supporters: (1) Madkhalis like Shamsi have repeatedly asserted that it is legitimate to secretly work with intelligence agencies which create fake or misleading social media videos. Does Shamsi now hold that it is forbidden to secretly work with such agencies? If he believes that is permissible to secretly work with such agencies (while they run misleading social media campaigns) how can he be trusted? (2) Will Shamsi officially file a complaint about the attack with the police, so that it can be investigated and the attackers can be punished? If he files a complaint will he share a copy with the public? If Shamsi does not file a complaint, this raises the possibility that either a real attack never occurred, or that only a very mild non-threatening attack occurred and he is exaggerating things. (3) Shamsi and his Madkhali associates are mass circulating images of Shamsi's bleeding mouth. However, in the past weeks they have refused to share images of the Israeli genocide in Palestine. Can Shamsi explain why this is the case? Why should Muslims be outraged about an exaggerated minor (possibly fake) attack on Shamsi, but they should ignore the genocidal war being waged on Palestinians? (4) Shamsi and his fellow Madkhalis have continually indicated explicitly and implicitly that Hamas is responsible for the Israeli attack on them. If this type of reasoning is accepted, why not argue that Shamsi is responsible for the attack on him? Shamsi will say that Hamas acted wrongly, and this resulted in the attack on them. But it can also be said that Shamsi acted wrongly (e.g., by aiding Israel against the Palestinians), and this resulted in the attack on him.